I'm betting that as a reporter misunderstanding what he was told. If that plane doesn't have brakes, it likely doesn't have nose steering either (and reverse/differential power are...minimally effective).
Not speaking from experience, or knowledge, but wouldn't the grass reduce damage to this particular aircraft? That concrete CAN'T be good for landing gear.
I doubt it. We had an RJ go into the EMAS a few years back. They used a tow truck to pull it out, had some mechanics inspect it and then flew it back to a MX base with the gear pinned down. In the end they replaced all three gear struts and tire assemblies, but there was very little damage in general.
With the props so close to the rudder, anything more than shallow beta (maybe a quarter inch past the gate on the levers) and it washes out the rudder. It starts slapping back and forth and you get one hellofan eye opening ride. It's a mistake you only need to make once.
Not speaking from experience, or knowledge, but wouldn't the grass reduce damage to this particular aircraft? That concrete CAN'T be good for landing gear.
Nahh, no such limitations or even suggestions in the books for that. The forward wing is a lot higher off the ground than you might think. Not to mention, that's the whole point of EMAS. Voluntarily putting a fast moving plane into grass that isn't designed to be, or manicured as, a runway is a pretty big gamble with both your life and your career. Just look at the pictures of the Pistachio off the runway in FNT to see what I mean...
I doubt it. We had an RJ go into the EMAS a few years back. They used a tow truck to pull it out, had some mechanics inspect it and then flew it back to a MX base with the gear pinned down. In the end they replaced all three gear struts and tire assemblies, but there was very little damage in general.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.