So what your saying is Trump was right regarding paying taxes, use the existing laws to your best advantage?
It seems to me to be possible to use the existing tax laws to your maximum advantage, and, simultaneously, to abhor the existing tax (and, more importantly, tax-enforcement) structure, wherein some toupee'd grifter can pay little or nothing in taxes by dint of utilizing so *many* illegal and/or dubiously legal stratagems that the relevant enforcement mechanisms are overwhelmed (or, it seems like in some cases, find it politically expedient to look the other way).
You're presenting a false equivalency, here. No one in this conversation has the capability to, for example, sell NFTs of them in their Underoos to gullible idiots under the banner of "sticking it to the libtards" or whatever coloring-book level lunacy. Similarly, neither I nor (I suspect) you are in a position to logjam any prosecution for tax-avoidance in to the next decade through baldly bad-faith legal maneuvers.
Taxation, like any other legitimate function of government, depends upon the governed accepting, however grudgingly, the necessity of the governmental function. Like, for example, I, and I think probably you, too, accept that taxation is necessary for the continued function of a modern society. Like you, I want to minimize the slice that I pay
vis a vis what I might have to pay if I don't carefully examine my exposure. There's nothing wrong with that, it's playing the game intelligently, and, essentially, seeing to it that you aren't, yourself, paying MORE than what has, through the various (overly-)complex gears of democracy, been determined to be your "fair share".
That's not
anything like the same thing as becoming the head of the government which is funded BY taxation, and then gloating about not contributing *at all* to the common wheal. That's not Smart, it's Sociopathic. Although I grant you that the two are probably imagined to be synonymous by Donnie the Grifter.