I have heard tell, and I don't know since I never flew the MU-2, but I heard that an engine failure on take off is some bad business, especially if you follow the normal "turn into the good engine" instinct and the spoiler on the good engine comes up + no thrust on the bad engine. Care to elaborate?
This is definitely true. The first "memory item" for an engine failure is roll trim, since there are trim ailerons (rather than spoilers). It does not behave at all like your average light twin in an engine-out situation, especially at low speeds. I'm sure I've gone on at absurd length about this somewhere, I'll see if I can find it...
Know what's great? When a plane flies like an airplane and nothing stupid happens due to poor engineering.
This is definitely true. The first "memory item" for an engine failure is roll trim, since there are trim ailerons (rather than spoilers). It does not behave at all like your average light twin in an engine-out situation, especially at low speeds. I'm sure I've gone on at absurd length about this somewhere, I'll see if I can find it...
A design feature of the MU-2 is its high cruise speed while having a low landing speed. This is accomplished by using full-span, double-slotted flaps on the trailing edge of the wing. These flaps give the MU-2 a wing area comparable to a Beech King Air in landing configuration while having a wing area comparable to a light jet while in cruise mode. The full-span flaps meant that over-wing spoilers were employed instead of conventional ailerons. These spoilers are highly effective, even when the MU-2 wing is stalled. Some fatal accidents have occurred because normal engine-out procedures for light twin aircraft are not effective when flying the MU-2. The commonly taught procedure of reducing flap following an engine failure on take off leads to a critical reduction in lift in the MU-2 due to the highly effective double-slotted flaps. When pilots were taught to retain take-off flap and to reduce climb rate in the event of an engine failure, MU-2 accident rates reduced to almost nil.
When Beechcraft finally gets around to making the 99D, they should make it a bit bigger and bigger engines.
Excellent Idea!
In pax configuration I'm thinking maybe 19 seats.
They'll eventually all time out. Wing spar iirc.Why do you need to replace them? Have they all crashed? Fly them till you die!
I bet they would keep them flying somehow.They'll eventually all time out. Wing spar iirc.
Ya, they can replace the wing spars.I bet they would keep them flying somehow.