Pilot Fighter
Well-Known Member
Smyrna did a nice job honoring Kuss and the Blue Angels.Right after take off.
Capt. Jeff Kuss USMC Memorial | Capt. Jeff Kuss USMC Memorial

Smyrna did a nice job honoring Kuss and the Blue Angels.Right after take off.
I had a buddy on the team that year. It was tough on them all.Smyrna did a nice job honoring Kuss and the Blue Angels.
Capt. Jeff Kuss USMC Memorial | Capt. Jeff Kuss USMC Memorial
captjeffkussusmcmemorial.com
Almost everyone flying in an airshow has a choice when things go badly. In my experience, everyone who is dynamically maneuvering in an airshow is wearing a parachute, as well as many who are not dynamically maneuvering.None of the other performers in the show get the choice. It's their job to fly it to the crash site.
I'm not talking about ripping a wing off, where there are no choices left to me made. Or as @Lawman so eloquently put it, you are "no longer a voting member of the aircraft directional control committee."Almost everyone flying in an airshow has a choice when things go badly. In my experience, everyone who is dynamically maneuvering in an airshow is wearing a parachute, as well as many who are not dynamically maneuvering.
I don't dynamically maneuver, but I always wear a parachute and I expect to use it under certain circumstances. If the airplane is not controllable (i.e., following a mid air) or there is fire in the cockpit, I'm not riding it in. It's not a hypothetical argument to me; it's part of my preflight brief. I've thought long and hard about it and I'm prepared to live with the consequences of my decision.
Since most performers have a choice, the only thing you're really debating is jumping vs. being propelled out of the cockpit.
Ok. That is one way to look at it. But it is a really weird and sadistic way.I am not aware of any. As far as I know Capt Kuss' crash in Smyrna was the only one that happened during takeoff. Crashed in a postage stamp size field. Deliberate? Maybe. He didn't attempt to eject until it was too late. Was that to verify it was going to impact where he wanted it to? Maybe. Was it because he was trying to salvage it all the way till the end. More than likely. But in the public's eye hes a hero. News at 11.
I think someone commented on the other thread that him getting out now saves his family the grief of the same tragedy. While true, what do they get in return? A pilot who now has to re-live the incident over and over. Second guessing himself for the rest of his life over the loss of the child on the ground. He rides it in, his family gets to see him as a hero irrespective of his actual behavior in the last few moments. Now they get a pilot with PTSD and more than likely a disorder that hopefully won't tear his family apart when its all said and done. Which is worse? I think about missing an altitude call for 2 days trying figure out what was wrong with me that day. I can even imagine having to live with something like this for the rest of my life. Not that I will EVER get the chance, but if it was me....I'm taking it in. Easy for me to say huh?
Let's not forget, these guys are military. No one signs up to die, but you better be ready to. Why do the tactical guys get the option of abandoning the ride when no one else does? In war time? Absolutley, no questions asked. Even though there are many military aircraft without that option. In an airshow environment, nah, I'm against it.
None of the other performers in the show get the choice. It's their job to fly it to the crash site.
The suicide later will be so much better. Think of all that extra time they had.Ok. That is one way to look at it. But it is a really weird and sadistic way.
"Yeah, I have a dad, but since he has PTSD from an airshow crash, I might as well not have him at all". Said no kid ever.
Ok. That is one way to look at it. But it is a really weird and sadistic way.
"Yeah, I have a dad, but since he has PTSD from an airshow crash, I might as well not have him at all". Said no kid ever.
I'm not talking about ripping a wing off, where there are no choices left to me made. Or as @Lawman so eloquently put it, you are "no longer a voting member of the aircraft directional control committee."
But it all other cases, there made be something to be done right at the end that buys you 6 extra feet, either horizontally or vertically. Long enough, high enough, to just get over the road or miss the building or whatever that makes the difference between killing a 5 year old or not.
The phrase fly it as far into the crash as you can is a phrase for a reason.In my experience, when flying aircraft at the edges of the envelope, the brief includes a discussion about an unplanned airborne evacuation in the event of A, B, C, or D and the call for ejection. None of the briefs I have ever given or heard included a conditional phrase of "If A, B, C, or D occurs but I have the chance to hang on for a few more seconds - then we will eject."
If you need out, you need out, regardless of where the aircraft is going after you leave. As MikeD pointed out, the CG and thrust vector will change anyway, so if you did hang out for an extra second because of the Kentucky Windage you calculated before leaving, it won't matter anyway. See Newton's First and Third Laws.
The phrase fly it as far into the crash as you can is a phrase for a reason.
Briefed or not.
Why isn't every aircraft certified with ejection seats then? If the pilot has no obligation to the general public then why doesn't every aircraft get one? Why don't the pilots of a 737 get to choose whether or not to ride it in if a guy in a jet doesn't have to care about where his machine goes after he leaves?The same logic could be applied to any general aviation aircraft conducting spin training.
“Hey guys, give up your chutes. Take it all the way down or do it right, no excuses.”
That’s an absolutely ridiculous standard of application.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Why isn't every aircraft certified with ejection seats then? If the pilot has no obligation to the general public then why doesn't every aircraft get one? Why don't the pilots of a 737 get to choose whether or not to ride it in if a guy in a jet doesn't have to care about where his machine goes after he leaves?
I didn't have a chute when I was doing spin training, we'd just clean out all of the crap in back of the mighty 152, head to Malibu and send it. I sometimes wonder what those folks on the beach thought of us seemingly falling out of the sky, recovering, climbing and repeating it over and over. Were we doing it wrong?The same logic could be applied to any general aviation aircraft conducting spin training.
“Hey guys, give up your chutes. Take it all the way down or do it right, no excuses.”
That’s an absolutely ridiculous standard of application.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I didn't have a chute when I was doing spin training, we'd just clean out all of the crap in back of the mighty 152, head to Malibu and send it. I sometimes wonder what those folks on the beach thought of us seemingly falling out of the sky, recovering, climbing and repeating it over and over. Were we doing it wrong?
I’ve been up a few times in an S2B. The owner, my friend, would make me empty my pockets and place everything in a locker in his hangar and then fit me with a parachute and brief me everytime about how to use it and how to get out of the airplane. And then we’d head to Malibu and give it a half hearted try to make sure I was fine and then head to the aerobatic box out by what used to be Indian Dunes and get down to it. He was a prominent aerobatic pilot and it was not entirely uncommon to have a little smoke in the cockpit during some of the more “aggressive “ maneuvers. I’m eternally grateful for the time I spent finding out what flying actually is.Standard spin training with a CFI negates the CFR (but that doesn’t mean it negates that locations insurance).
It doesn’t negate the CFR if the aircraft goes inverted, etc, ie Aerobatics training. Or if a pilot of say a Super Decathlon wanted to take people on a barn storming ride. Those guys are out there right now, putting airplanes in violent flight envelop positions, ready to leave it when it looks like it isn’t gonna work out.
Obviously since some people can’t/don’t have chutes nobody should.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Because the performance envelope they exist in, the likelihood of critical malfunction, the redundancy available to the aviator in those circumstances, and the suitability of emergency landing/ditching don’t dictate it.
You’ve got no shortage of people who fly those aircraft types explaining it. They’ve also explained there is no benefit to simply “riding it in,” in a host of situations. Viper Demo •s it’s hydraulics and is now an unpowered dart… well sucks to be that guy, we disabled his seat so he won’t pull the • handle too early. If he slammed into a crowd we can all somehow feel better about that outcome?
Again, why are GA spin pilots allowed to fly with a chute. They knew the risks.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
In my experience, when flying aircraft at the edges of the envelope, the brief includes a discussion about an unplanned airborne evacuation in the event of A, B, C, or D and the call for ejection. None of the briefs I have ever given or heard included a conditional phrase of "If A, B, C, or D occurs but I have the chance to hang on for a few more seconds - then we will eject."
If you need out, you need out, regardless of where the aircraft is going after you leave. As MikeD pointed out, the CG and thrust vector will change anyway, so if you did hang out for an extra second because of the Kentucky Windage you calculated before leaving, it won't matter anyway. See Newton's First and Third Laws.