Moxy and 60 A220s

We both you know you’d be paying a multiple of that fare on DAL if it wasn’t for Southwest being in the market. Say what you want about the management team, but SWA does a good job keeping the legacies honest on pricing.

Funny. In EVERY market that Delta competed against AirTran, and competed successfully, when SWA took it over the fares actually increased because SWA could not make money at that level. SWA was responsible for the average ticket INCREASE in the Atlanta market.
 
I actually think they have no role in this whatsoever today. That role is served by Spirirt, Frontier, Allegiant, etc. Southwest is a high cost carrier at this point. One reason for the purchase of AirTran was because they couldn’t compete with us on cost.

To some extent, for sure. But those 3 don’t have nearly enough scale yet for it to be a system wide effect. They will before long, and it’s going to be a problem for everybody domestically.

Southwest, JetBlue, and Alaska are all still larger and challenge the legacies on fares across the broader domestic market.



Sorry, but if you think “business select” on Southwest is something special, you need to get out more.

Can’t recall where I said anything about Business Select in my post. It was the seemingly out of place jab about “trailer park people” people that drew the “you’re better than that.” Lots of good arguments made, and I tend to agree with you on a lot of things business/finance, but unnecessary stuff like that totally kills the argument. Especially when up to that point, unless I missed something, it had seemingly been pretty civil. Didn’t see a personal-jab before that, but maybe I missed it.


Funny. In EVERY market that Delta competed against AirTran, and competed successfully, when SWA took it over the fares actually increased because SWA could not make money at that level. SWA was responsible for the average ticket INCREASE in the Atlanta market.

Fares rose in ATL when SWA cut capacity and “de-hubbed” it. Clearly, DAL was also raising fares given the regions fare increase across the board. When the legacies don’t have to compete, fares tend to go through the roof. When they have to compete, with carriers like SWA, they aggressively fare match and people think “oh, Southwest isn’t any cheaper than the other options,” not knowing that Southwest (or ALK, JBLU, SAVE, etc) ARE the reason fares compressed in the first place. I could give you the exact same argument for PHL-PIT — when SWA entered, fares became a fraction of what they previously were with US. After SWA left, fares went back to exorbitant levels.

I should add that we can argue about fares and whether or not Southwest is a "low fare" airline until we're all blue in the face. That being said, mathematically they are the lowest cost of the LCC group - lower costs than both Alaska and JetBlue.
 
Last edited:
With regards to SWA, AirTran and Delta in Atlanta, you got it wrong. What I wrote came straight form G. Hauenstein. I’ll take his word over yours any day of the week. Delta was already competing against an LCC with a lower cost structure than SWA. And eating their lunch. SWA could not match the AirTran fares on the routes they took over. They were losing money and that’s why they Dehubbed.

There was no competing LCC in PIT/PHL prior to SWA. As much as the ardent fanboys don’t want to admit it, SWA is no longer an LCC. Much like the 50ish hooker, still trying to woo johns with the coochie shorts, SWA is actually now a mainline carrier still trying to fool the public.
 
Sorry, but if you think “business select” on Southwest is something special, you need to get out more.

It wasn't something particularly special, but you were whining again about how you hate not having to fight for a seat and I offered just one example of how you don't. For the 20 to 30ish dollars to upgrade over the middle tier fare I get a really good choice of seat, board first, get to go through the shorter security line, get an extra 1000 to 1500 in points and a free drink. It's no first class, but it's great value compared to the other airlines whose baggage fee is about the price anyway. You can get into American's offerings of worthless things that cost about as much like a point multiplier.
 
It wasn't something particularly special, but you were whining again about how you hate not having to fight for a seat and I offered just one example of how you don't. For the 20 to 30ish dollars to upgrade over the middle tier fare I get a really good choice of seat, board first, get to go through the shorter security line, get an extra 1000 to 1500 in points and a free drink. It's no first class, but it's great value compared to the other airlines whose baggage fee is about the price anyway. You can get into American's offerings of worthless things that cost about as much like a point multiplier.

Not first class? My friend, it’s not even a reserved seat!
 
I almost always prefer choosing my own seat, especially when I'm at the front of the line. I don't know what you're so bitter about.

You understand that when you buy a ticket on a real airline, you get to pick the seat, right? When you book it! It’s been like this for decades.
 
You understand that when you buy a ticket on a real airline, you get to pick the seat, right? When you book it! It’s been like this for decades.

I'm quite happy getting to sit with friends and whoever I've already befriended while waiting to board and since I got A-List I never get stuck with a middle unless I choose that I want to sit there. I don't know why that concept is so offensive to you, but I happen to think freedom of choice is a perk.
 
The big players in the LCC business aren’t SWA. It’s Spirit and Frontier.

SWA is trying to compete with the legacies because Spirit and Frontier are apparently eating their lunch and it’s not because they want to serve ATL-MCO, they literally have to or they’ll get cut out of the market permanently.

The only real competitor that gave Delta a run for it’s money in ATL was Air Tran, but after the merger and entry of ULCC’s, their attack was effectively quelled.

Like ATL-LAX
SWA is $490
DAL is $486
Frontier is $282
Spirit is $274
 
With regards to SWA, AirTran and Delta in Atlanta, you got it wrong. What I wrote came straight form G. Hauenstein. I’ll take his word over yours any day of the week. Delta was already competing against an LCC with a lower cost structure than SWA. And eating their lunch. SWA could not match the AirTran fares on the routes they took over. They were losing money and that’s why they Dehubbed.

There was no competing LCC in PIT/PHL prior to SWA. As much as the ardent fanboys don’t want to admit it, SWA is no longer an LCC. Much like the 50ish hooker, still trying to woo johns with the coochie shorts, SWA is actually now a mainline carrier still trying to fool the public.

Understood that it came straight from Glenn, and I would take his word for it too. The dynamic clearly wasn’t sustainable for Southwest and so they chose to put those airplanes elsewhere in the system.

I hate to continue derailing the thread down the SWA path, but they are a low cost carrier. As I said above, we can argue fares until we are blue in the face - we'll have to pull actual average domestic fare data vs. anecdotes - but they undoubtedly have a low cost structure. Of the 3 LCC’s (SWA, ALK, JBLU), Southwest has the lowest costs when adjusted to identical stage lengths. They are not at ULCC-level, but nobody will reach that without going max-pax configuration.

The big players in the LCC business aren’t SWA. It’s Spirit and Frontier.

SWA is trying to compete with the legacies because Spirit and Frontier are apparently eating their lunch and it’s not because they want to serve ATL-MCO, they literally have to or they’ll get cut out of the market permanently.

The only real competitor that gave Delta a run for it’s money in ATL was Air Tran, but after the merger and entry of ULCC’s, their attack was effectively quelled.

Like ATL-LAX
SWA is $490
DAL is $486
Frontier is $282
Spirit is $274

I’m not sure I’ve seen anywhere yet that suggests SWA is getting their lunch eaten by the ULCC’s - some pressure, sure, but I’ve not seen anything to suggest they are getting crushed. They certainly haven’t launched a whole new segment of their cabin to compete with ULCC’s (yet), as each of the legacies have already done. And there is no chance they are flying ATL-MCO because they have to, they serve it because MCO is a “bottomless pit” of leisure demand that they can capture within their cost structure (and MCO is a hub on the other side for them).

As I said earlier, the ATL-LAX anecdote is nice, but I suspect DAL is matching SWA’s fares. We need actual domestic fare data to see what the true comparisons are, but I still suspect that on average, Southwest’s fares are going to be lower than the legacies. I am sure that in your RM departments, how Southwest is pricing in competitive markets is closely watched and matched. I will try to dig some actual concrete numbers up this weekend - we’ll see where it all shakes out.

Sheesh - I’m starting to sound like an SWA apologist (or worse, “fanboy”, whatever that may be). Just trying to bring some balance to an otherwise lopsided discussion. I’ll reiterate my broader position - this business is commoditizing. The carrier with the lowest cost structure will eventually win. Outside of Allegiant, Frontier, and Spirit, Southwest has the next lowest costs and an investment grade balance sheet - they run, and have historically run, one of the better airlines in this business. Delta has since caught-on after the bankruptcy/NWA merger and is a top-run (top-tier?!) airline. But everyone is going to eventually be in trouble as/if Spirit and Frontier continue to grow unabated.
 
I hate to continue derailing the thread down the SWA path, but they are a low cost carrier. As I said above, we can argue fares until we are blue in the face - we'll have to pull actual average domestic fare data vs. anecdotes - but they undoubtedly have a low cost structure. Of the 3 LCC’s (SWA, ALK, JBLU), Southwest has the lowest costs when adjusted to identical stage lengths.

This is a meaningless number. You can't just adjust for identical stage lengths mathematically as analysts do and get an apples to apples comparison. You can do that when comparing Delta and United, or United and American. These are apples to apples comparisons, because these are all international network carriers. Southwest is not. Therefore, Southwest has a lower cost structure overall simply because they're not supporting that international network. But if you eliminated all of the costs that Delta, United, and American have to support that international structure, I pretty much guarantee you'd find a lower cost structure than Southwest.
 
This is a meaningless number. You can't just adjust for identical stage lengths mathematically as analysts do and get an apples to apples comparison. You can do that when comparing Delta and United, or United and American. These are apples to apples comparisons, because these are all international network carriers. Southwest is not. Therefore, Southwest has a lower cost structure overall simply because they're not supporting that international network. But if you eliminated all of the costs that Delta, United, and American have to support that international structure, I pretty much guarantee you'd find a lower cost structure than Southwest.
Yeah. It’s called the regional jet.
 
Nah, you pay for that privilege now. Even on SJI, with the basic beeeyotch fares.

Negative. The standard coach fare is still assigned seating. It's a bare bones sub-coach fare where the seat isn't assigned until check-in. But even if you had to pay for it, that's still something you can't do on Southworst!

Yeah. It’s called the regional jet.

Hmm. I do all domestic flying when I ride on Delta and American. I haven't been on an RJ since I last flew them in 2007. I mean, sure, if you want to fly to the middle of nowhere, you'll have to ride on one. But if you're flying to major metropolitan areas, not really. I'm flying to Dallas Love next month on Delta. It's my old beloved 717. No RJ, even to a secondary airport.
 
This is a meaningless number. You can't just adjust for identical stage lengths mathematically as analysts do and get an apples to apples comparison. You can do that when comparing Delta and United, or United and American. These are apples to apples comparisons, because these are all international network carriers. Southwest is not. Therefore, Southwest has a lower cost structure overall simply because they're not supporting that international network. But if you eliminated all of the costs that Delta, United, and American have to support that international structure, I pretty much guarantee you'd find a lower cost structure than Southwest.

As I stated, the cost comparison was against Alaska and JetBlue, two carriers with nearly identical operating profiles as Southwest. And when adjusting on that basis, they most certainly do have lower costs.

I don't believe that the legacies would have lower costs vs. the LCC's even after eliminating the operating / overhead expenses of international flying, but if that's what the math says then it's indisputable. Do you have any data to support the guarantee?
 
As I stated, the cost comparison was against Alaska and JetBlue, two carriers with nearly identical operating profiles as Southwest. And when adjusting on that basis, they most certainly do have lower costs.

Where are you getting your numbers? Here's what I found for 2016 CASM:

Southwest - 10.8 cents
JetBlue - 10.2 cents

I haven't been able to find 2017 CASM for JetBlue, but Southwest's increased significantly, so I don't expect the results to be much different.

I don't believe that the legacies would have lower costs vs. the LCC's even after eliminating the operating / overhead expenses of international flying, but I'm open to looking at the numbers. Do you have any data to support the guarantee?

Such data would be pretty much impossible to determine without completely open books of the carriers involved and a detailed audit of a major accounting firm. But spend any amount of time seeing Southwest from the inside, you'll realize that it's very similar to the legacies pre-bankruptcy: bloated and inefficient.
 
Where are you getting your numbers? Here's what I found for 2016 CASM:

Southwest - 10.8 cents
JetBlue - 10.2 cents

I haven't been able to find 2017 CASM for JetBlue, but Southwest's increased significantly, so I don't expect the results to be much different.



Such data would be pretty much impossible to determine without completely open books of the carriers involved and a detailed audit of a major accounting firm. But spend any amount of time seeing Southwest from the inside, you'll realize that it's very similar to the legacies pre-bankruptcy: bloated and inefficient.

I agree parsing out international for legacies will be nearly impossible. I still don't think they would have lower costs than the 3 guys below, but we may have to table that one absent more concrete data. I also think you'd be surprised at the amount of "bloat" at all of the carriers right now. Look at JetBlue - recently went through a layoff/volunteer removal program at Corporate, and in the midst of a $300M cost restructing program. Oh, and they recently wrote-off $300M on their E190's, which means that for the past 10-years, approx. $30M per year was missing in their cost structure for depreciation (granted, as you know, it's non-cash so I don't lose a lot of sleep over that). Cost structures are going the wrong way across the board right now for potentially being at/near cycle peak.

From JetBlue, Alaska, and Southwest 2017 10-K's. For Stage-Length Adjusted CASM (SL-CASM) I adjust everybody to a consistent 1,000mi. CASM-Ex = CASM Excluding Fuel. SL-CASM is adjusted using this formula: (CASM)*(Avg. Stage / 1000)^0.5, as is widely accepted in the industry.

JetBlue
CASM = 10.74 cents
CASM-Ex = 8.31 cents
Average stage length = 1,072 mi
SL-CASM = 11.12 cents
SL-CASM-Ex = 8.60 cents

Alaska
CASM = 10.69 cents
CASM-Ex = 7.39 cents
Average stage length = 1,195 mi
SL-CASM = 11.69 cents
SL-CASM-Ex = 8.08 cents

Southwest
CASM = 11.48 cents
CASM-Ex = 8.92 cents
Average stage length = 754 miles
SL-CASM = 9.97 cents
SL-CASM-Ex = 7.74 cents

Looking at those SL-adjusted numbers, Southwest is the lowest by ~10-15% when including fuel, and by ~5-10% when excluding fuel (probably a better indicator of true cost structure).
 
Back
Top