No. The underside of the wings are painted white, making it difficult to discern their outline.Is the right wing missing?
No. The underside of the wings are painted white, making it difficult to discern their outline.Is the right wing missing?
Looks like it's behind a wall.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
No. The underside of the wings are painted white, making it difficult to discern their outline.
Agreed, my mistake. I should have said the tops of the wings are painted white.It appears we are looking at the top of the aircraft, not the bottom.
After looking at that image I'm going to disagree, the airplane appears to have both wings. Not to mention the Lear wing is one piece, it's bolted to the bottom of the fuselage. Hard to imagine them stressing it hard enough to break it that close to landing, if my old brain recalls correctly it has 7 spars, not exactly flimsy.They did say they found a wing in a near by building if I remember the report earlier. My guess they hit the building before this pic and sheared the wing
Exactly my reactionThat picture sucks.
Are you suggesting that doing the 4L at JFK circle to 31R and "turn over the cartoon factory" or (my personal favorite) "hit the timer and turn 045 at 30 seconds" isn't Read-World? Sir, I believe you might be endangering the profits of a successful Murican Enterprise! To the Camps with him.
It's a visual maneuver, so not subject to TERPS restrictions on circling, at least as I understand it. The nomenclature should probably be "N123XY, field in sight" "N123XY, cleared visual runway 1", although to my recollection, that's not the terminology in use.
It comes down to stable approach. It's drilled in our heads in every training event and nothing about that approach is stable.
Define stable, nothing about that approach is stable?