z987k
Well-Known Member
fixed.Turbo commander for me plz
fixed.Turbo commander for me plz
We've got three birds with the older flap system with the much lower flap and gear speeds. Total PITA when coming into DEN. Fortunately I have to have a cheat sheet to look up the speeds because I fly those infrequently.Vlo was 125, I hate that I still know that...
We've got three birds with the older flap system with the much lower flap and gear speeds. Total PITA when coming into DEN. Fortunately I have to have a cheat sheet to look up the speeds because I fly those infrequently.
Lol, this made me smile, thanks.Makes rated power to a higher alt than the pos 99 does.
I think the highest density altitude I've seen is 9,000 or so and I used most of a 6,000 runway, slightly downhill. The company take off power setting is 40" but I regularly get a few more inches than that. Most of our Navajo runs go easy of here so I regularly operate out of a 2,500 and a 3,500 MSL runway and have never had a problem.How's the thing do in high Denalt airports? You know ANC area, I'm flying the thing around at sea-level for most take offs.
lol, what? Takeoff power is throttles full. Anything less is just straight retarded. It's not a 402.I think the highest density altitude I've seen is 9,000 or so and I used most of a 6,000 runway, slightly downhill. The company take off power setting is 40" but I regularly get a few more inches than that. Most of our Navajo runs go easy of here so I regularly operate out of a 2,500 and a 3,500 MSL runway and have never had a problem.
I'd love to get one down to sea level in Alaska conditions though.
lol, what? Takeoff power is throttles full. Anything less is just straight retarded. It's not a 402.
It's actually dumber than landing with the props back at 2300rpm. And that's one of the dumbest policies I've seen in a LONG time.
You know you miss the Big Six....24/2400 till inside the cut, then a steady power reduction so you're power idle and top of the white arc over the river, activate the insta-flaps and go prop forward, land, exit Charlie.Landing with the props back was something I encountered in the 99 - when asked why, they said, "noise abatement." So I never did it (oops ), in the Navajo, I push the props the rest of the way up in the navajo when I'm off the governor, on approach I go to 2400, but that's per company policy, I'd prefer to have them full forward FAF inbound, but that's just me.
You know you miss the Big Six....24/2400 till inside the cut, then a steady power reduction so you're power idle and top of the white arc over the river, activate the insta-flaps and go prop forward, land, exit Charlie.
In fact the Lycoming documentation insists on full power for takeoff. Something about an additional fuel valve that opens at full throttle.lol, what? Takeoff power is throttles full. Anything less is just straight retarded. It's not a 402.
It's actually dumber than landing with the props back at 2300rpm. And that's one of the dumbest policies I've seen in a LONG time.
I fly it like the company tells me. At the same time, if I need it, I got it ,lol, what? Takeoff power is throttles full. Anything less is just straight retarded. It's not a 402.
It's actually dumber than landing with the props back at 2300rpm. And that's one of the dumbest policies I've seen in a LONG time.
Well, I guess really, that's only in the one slower plane in the fleet...the other aircraft the power usually comes back a mite sooner.24 square until inside the cut? Whooohhheeee, I think you guys are tougher on the engines than I was ;-) But yeah. I do miss the Scare-a-kee. The 206 is arguably less useful there in SE, but I prefer it just in general. If I could own a "big bore" single, I'd own a 206.
I did a takeoff today where I was leaving an airport at 50' MSL and cruising at about 1500' and my hands were essentially constantly in motion from the time I pulled the gear up to the time I leveled off.
Do my before takeoff flowSo what? It's like that all the time in the Arrow
Well, I guess really, that's only in the one slower plane in the fleet...the other aircraft the power usually comes back a mite sooner.
Well there's things that are well.. um ok. And then there's things that are actually unsafe. This is one of them.I fly it like the company tells me. At the same time, if I need it, I got it ,
Well, all the Navajo drivers I know at the company are still sucking wind, we haven't had any major engines failures since I've been here, the fuel flow still pegs out on take off, and my paychecks are on time.Well there's things that are well.. um ok. And then there's things that are actually unsafe. This is one of them.
Ya, we never had any engine failures due to anything but stupid pilot, but if you're going to do a reduced power takeoff in a light twin.... I mean I really can't get my head around that. I'd flat refuse that on safety grounds. It's not that it's hard on the engine, it's that you're spending too much time getting altitude that you NEED in this airplane in the event of an engine failure. At max gross on one engine, the SE SS is still not much above sea level.
Another operator of pa31's has a policy of landing with the props back at 2300 rpms. In the words of southpark... dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.
Piper PA-31-350 Chieftain - Performance Data
Horsepower: 350 Gross Weight: 7000 lbs
Top Speed: 230 kts Empty Weight: 4221 lbs
Cruise Speed: 211 kts Fuel Capacity: 182 gal
Stall Speed (dirty): 74 kts Range: 883 nm
Takeoff Landing
Ground Roll: 1350 ft Ground Roll 1045 ft
Over 50 ft obstacle: 2510 ft Over 50 ft obstacle: 1880 ft
Rate Of Climb: 1120 fpm Rate of Climb (One Engine): 230 fpm
Ceiling: 24000 ft Ceiling (One Engine): 13700 ft