TFaudree_ERAU
Mashin' dem buttons
Oh wells you win some you lose some. And it sucks when you lose and there is evidence.
Then there's the other angle from the Sonesta
Oh wells you win some you lose some. And it sucks when you lose and there is evidence.
Yea that one is uglier, you can see smoke and mother's covering their children.Then there's the other angle from the Sonesta
Sure, if you've got 8-10,000 feet to play with grease it on. Otherwise put it in the touch down zone firmly. I think of more guys in the corp world would stop trying to grease it,
More importantly, how do I find this Vne speed in my jet?
Or if you get a left generator failure at 100 knots in the sim, continue the takeoff, have your right engine start surging, then hand yourself an even bigger emergency when you call for it to be shut down... Well, just handle it and kick yourself in the ass later.
(Not that I know this from experience....or something...)
If you do not do a rejected takeoff, the examiner's anger and frustration resulting from the realization that they now have to spend an extra 15 minutes in that god forsaken box is going to get taken out on YOU.
There's a simple solution if the above happens. Inform the sim examiner that its not your fault that he's a sim monkey and you're not, and that he has to actually do his job for once and think outside the script. He/she will appreciate your honest, refreshing outlook.
Does that thing do anything quickly?in the cj3 i plan using a 240/.62 profile. climbing at 280/.74 has me arrive .1-.2 & 100-200 lbs les then the above plan. it takes 35 mins to climb into the 40's, but you make up for the longer time at lower altitude with increased forward speed. that being said, the fj44 engine is likely a hell of a lot more efficient then whatever is on the hawkers or older jets, and lingering through the 20's and 30's doesnt break our bank unless you are trying to fly 1600nm+
This.How do you fly a jet?
Configure early when you're still learning and don't suck.
Does that thing do anything quickly?
Break?
in the cj3 i plan using a 240/.62 profile. climbing at 280/.74 has me arrive .1-.2 & 100-200 lbs les then the above plan. it takes 35 mins to climb into the 40's, but you make up for the longer time at lower altitude with increased forward speed. that being said, the fj44 engine is likely a hell of a lot more efficient then whatever is on the hawkers or older jets, and lingering through the 20's and 30's doesnt break our bank unless you are trying to fly 1600nm+
I love books wrotten by the US gov't.It's funny. There is this old (and free) book wrotten by the US gov't that talks about operating jets.
It discusses various profiles, why high speeds can affect controllability nd really kills fuel burn.
There's also one of our secret JC resources, Jimflyfast who can explain it all too.