Hey man, their loss, no worries.
One thing I always say in my letters of recommendation is that we need to get ahold of (candidate) before our competition does.![]()
I could've sworn that mine said "...over my dead body!" or something along those lines.
Hey man, their loss, no worries.
One thing I always say in my letters of recommendation is that we need to get ahold of (candidate) before our competition does.![]()
I could've sworn that mine said "...over my dead body!" or something along those lines.
They showed you that? What the hell!![]()
Oh, every airline can say that.
I followed in a Delta Airbus 330 across the Atlantic and on London Control, Shanwick Oceanic, Gander Oceanic, Gander Center, Moncton Center, Boston and New York:
"Aaaaaand Deltaaaaaaaah's XXXXXX checkin in with ya onboard at three-five-OH"
Checkin in with ya onboard? What.... The.... HELL.
Plural?
The Aaaaaaaand?!?!
Southwest does do it better though. One guy had a stuck mic in the queue at Denver one night:
"We gots six [expletive] jets lined up waitin' on a got damn [expletive] metroliner to land!"
Wanna get away?
If it was a Beech 1900 it wouldn't have been in anyones way.
Lies! A metro will get you there faster and more efficiently. Plus you'd here it coming from miles away! Those SWA guys should have been in awe that such a magnificent piece of machinery graced their presence! Especially since it was one of the best commuter aircraft....industry leading really.![]()
I got turned down by two majors before getting hired. I was devastated to get turned down by CAL. You just have to keep plugging along. Looking back on it I can't imagine going through the whole process of making it as an airline pilot. I just chalk it up to being young at the time and having a different outlook and attitude. Oh..to be young again...haha.
Zap, while you are terribly disappointed, you are seeing the bright side, and the positive side, in this. You still have a career worthy job going for you. That's huge.
Metro is more efficient? Is that code for "it's underpowered"? The 1900 is only built better and easier to fly, almost like someone intended the thing to fly. 1900 would have been 248kts to 2.8nm.
The 1900 is only built better and easier to fly, almost like someone intended the thing to fly. 1900 would have been 248kts to 2.8nm.
The metro burns less than 600lbs an hour total in cruise in the 20's. It's duration is over 7hrs. It's more efficient.
That's about what the BE-350 burns, too...does the 1900 burn much more than that?
Oh, every airline can say that.
I followed in a Delta Airbus 330 across the Atlantic and on London Control, Shanwick Oceanic, Gander Oceanic, Gander Center, Moncton Center, Boston and New York:
"Aaaaaand Deltaaaaaaaah's XXXXXX checkin in with ya onboard at three-five-OH"
Checkin in with ya onboard? What.... The.... HELL.
Plural?
The Aaaaaaaand?!?!
That's bad, because that means at least two, if not all of them were doing it. Unless the jackhole disn't take a rest break.
Might have been one of those "I always take the middle break" captains I keep hearing about. Aye yi yi....