why do you keep slowing down

Nope. Nothing in the FARs or AIM about that. The autopilot would automatically initiate 500 fpm for a commanded descent if below the ECON descent path to wait for intercept, too, so apparently the manufacturer (Douglas/Boeing) wasn't aware that you guys wanted that, either. :)

Hmm, that's a new one. Never heard that.

Wow!! Now I'm definitely curious if this is something that all controllers think or just happened to be my trainers or what. Hmm, time to do some digging. Ok well I'll dial back some of my er, luv hate haha!
 
What's a standard rate? I've been flying for 20 years, and I've never heard of a standard descent rate. Is there something that you guys are expecting?

I think it really depends on the aircraft and airline SOP's. When I flew the Dash, 2500 ft/min was considered excessive, while in a Boeing it is pretty normal. Some airlines have a maximum allowable descent rate below certain altitudes for certain criteria. I never heard of a FAR for it though.

Like Derg said, I found it rather odd (and difficult) to slow down and expedite down. Especially without using full speedbrakes.
 
AIM 4-4-10 d.

When ATC has not used the term “AT PILOT’S
DISCRETION” nor imposed any climb or descent
restrictions, pilots should initiate climb or descent
promptly on acknowledgement of the clearance.
Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with
the operating characteristics of the aircraft to
1,000 feet above or below the assigned altitude, and
then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between
500 and 1,500 fpm until the assigned altitude is
reached. If at anytime the pilot is unable to climb or
descend at a rate of at least 500 feet a minute, advise
ATC.
If it is necessary to level off at an intermediate
altitude during climb or descent, advise ATC, except
when leveling off at 10,000 feet MSL on descent, or
2,500 feet above airport elevation (prior to entering a
Class C or Class D surface area), when required for
speed reduction.
 
The only issue I've seen is when ATC has us within 5 miles or so of the localizer on vectors, and we're still assigned 250. Not really a good speed to go charging into the localizer, at least on my jet. But, I'll always ask before slowing.
 
AIM 4-4-10 d.

Not a controller, but other than the "at least 500 fpm" thing, the FAA also publishes 'standard' climb and descent rates by type in 7110.65 Appendix A.

They'll change based on airline sops and training obviously, but it seems like a handy tool for dealing with dissimilar aircraft types.
 
[QUOTE="dasleben, post: 2423523, member: 4341"But, I'll always ask before slowing.[/QUOTE]

Ok, not picking on you, but this is a problem for me. I get trying to be a good member of the aerospace community and aid in traffic flow when possible, but if you got to slow down,then slow down. Don't let ATC fly you by remote control from a darkened room someplace! You're the pilot, you're on the "tip of the spear" (so to speak), you know how much distance you need to slow and configure or if it's even possible to do so. They don't.

Are we up there to keep them in a job? No!

By all mean cooperate to the extent possible, but if you're being shoved into a corner, don't be afraid to say "unable". And if the guy or gal in the left seat grumbles about it tough! You can only do what you can do in these airplanes. They're not exempt from the laws of physics. All of that energy has to go somewhere.
 
The only issue I've seen is when ATC has us within 5 miles or so of the localizer on vectors, and we're still assigned 250. Not really a good speed to go charging into the localizer, at least on my jet. But, I'll always ask before slowing.

What do you think about us adoption "ICAO" speeds here in the states? It would cut out most of the mystery.

Just thoughts.

Domestic flying in the US is basically "The Wild West" of the modern world.
 
@ZapBrannigan

You're not offending me, but understand I'm also a professional, and I certainly do not let ATC fly the jet from a darkened room. However, if I know spacing is tight, a courtesy "Hey, you still need 250 on the speed?" is good practice.

@Derg

I think it works great, and I'd totally support it. Everyone knows the speed everyone is flying at different phases of the approach.
 
AIM 4-4-10 d.

Not a controller, but other than the "at least 500 fpm" thing, the FAA also publishes 'standard' climb and descent rates by type in 7110.65 Appendix A.

They'll change based on airline sops and training obviously, but it seems like a handy tool for dealing with dissimilar aircraft types.
I may be confusing the two and got the 1000' number from somewhere. Maybe it was just a typical average expectation. I knew I saw a standard somewhere, thanks for posting it Weasel! Not gonna lie, kinda embarassed, I should have known.

[QUOTE="dasleben, post: 2423523, member: 4341"But, I'll always ask before slowing. By all mean cooperate to the extent possible, but if you're being shoved into a corner, don't be afraid to say "unable".
Yes yes yes yes. A lot of pilots (I find this more with students and GA) will say they'll do something and can't/won't. If you can't, that's really ok, just please tell me so I can adjust my plan accordingly.

Not to hijack this, but maybe a little bit... I find that there are times I'll clear someone for takeoff and also call the traffic on a X mile final, and they'll pull out on to the runway and SIT. Twice I've cleared someone for immediate and said what mile final the traffic was on and they got out there and sat. One I had to send around and the other was, well, I dropped my pencil but I'm sure he was 6,000 and airborne ;-) An "unable immediate, we'll hold short" would have been nice, assuming some last minute thing didn't happen in the cockpit that prevented them from rolling around the corner and going. If I'm getting all puckered up I'll key up and say I need you rolling, but sometimes it's too late or that was the whole point of immediate.

So, I want to yell at them, like - "You wouldn't do this in ATL, don't do it here!!" But I think they are so used to the lack of traffic here that they just don't think it's necessary. I don't bother to yell at them because 1-I don't believe in berating pilots over the frequency, and 2-what am I going to do.. yell at them, they'll say, "uh.. k..won't happen again, switching to departure". I mean they're gone and it's moot at that point.

If I tell you X mile final, do you have an idea of how long you have before you need to be rolling? I know as a pax when we pull on the runway I always look out and up the final and if I see someone and we aren't immediately rolling the back of my head gets itchy and feels weird because I know a plane is coming at us and we ain't movin'!!
 
@Derg

I think it works great, and I'd totally support it. Everyone knows the speed everyone is flying at different phases of the approach.

I think another angle is that we're pressed to follow traffic in sight, 190 to the marker, contact tower and about 80% of the time when you change over, it's "immediately slow to final approach speed, you have a 70 knot closure on preceding traffic"

Personally, if we fly ICAO speeds it cuts out the guesswork in terms of trying to judge closure and the temptation to do the naughty-naughty of using the TCAS for separation.
 
Same thing at N90 300kts over RBV with a steady stream and inevitably someone will slow to 250. Mostly AAL JBU and SWA are the biggest offenders. Then in the downwind which we prefer to run at 250 if we can, some yahoo slows to 180 when they have 40 more flying miles to go.
 
"immediately slow to final approach speed, you have a 70 knot closure on preceding traffic"
That could be because the overwhelming majority of major airports have their tower and TRACON split into two completely separate facilities. As a radar guy, I'm counting on that compression for my spacing, but the tower gets very nervous when they see a "large overtake in speed" and don't realize that as soon as you hit say AJAAY you're going to start slowing to land so they say things that make you guys panic and start throwing everything out to slow and thus you land 2.5-3.0 behind the guy we wanted you 1.5-2.0 behind.
 
I wonder what the solution is. More RTA's, managed arrival profiles?
 
That could be because the overwhelming majority of major airports have their tower and TRACON split into two completely separate facilities. As a radar guy, I'm counting on that compression for my spacing, but the tower gets very nervous when they see a "large overtake in speed"

He ain't the only one! When I see the TCAS target moving back towards us I get a little antsy too! Especially as I try to figure out how the heck to get this crazy thing slowed down, configured by 1000 feet on a 3 degree glideslope.
 
There is a very easy solution.

A Next Generation ATC System. Doubtful we will get there though without user fees for General Aviation.

That will come right after we achieve a two-state solution in the Middle East.

But in the meantime, I wonder if more canned speeds may be the answer so at least we're all on the same sheet of music.
 
Back
Top