What is this job to you?

What is this job to you?

  • Just a business decision. I’m in it for the money.

    Votes: 9 10.3%
  • I’ve loved airplanes since I was a kid, what else would I do?!

    Votes: 66 75.9%
  • I like my job, but I don’t geek out about airplanes or airline history.

    Votes: 26 29.9%

  • Total voters
    87
For the love of F I just want a good breakfast and the van time to allow for that.
I've learned that rarely exists in the hotel save for the rare ones that have their own restaurants. About the only redeeming quality of one of the old NK hotels in IAH was you got the restaurant breakfast for free and it was pretty damn good.
 
I'd have a better schedule and better seniority on the 767. It's the toyota camry of airplanes. I'd put the 737 in the same category. My career has meandered along to mostly fly things i wanted to fly. Those two airplanes are not amongst them by a long shot. It would definitely just be a job.
Having flown all 3 airplanes, I can 100% vouch for your Toyota Camry comparison.

I left the MD when I thought they were all going away, as my schedule was crap and the future was the 767 (of course, as soon as I left, the flying improved on the MD). Sure, there's variety in the schedule now (not just EWR and PDX), but the airplane is just...there. There's no thrill or challenge of the MD. It performs well, but it's nothing compared to what I have. It's just very basic.

For someone that's always been a huge, unapologetic airplane nerd, the MD-11 (and the short time I got in the -10-30...so cool to be able to put DC-10 in my logbook!) represented a dream! Yes, I'm flying for a paycheck, but I'm getting to do it in one of the coolest, most amazing airplanes ever built!

I miss the MD dearly!
 
For the love of F I just want a good breakfast and the van time to allow for that.
1732562787031.gif
 
For someone that's always been a huge, unapologetic airplane nerd, the MD-11 (and the short time I got in the -10-30...so cool to be able to put DC-10 in my logbook!) represented a dream!

I do get that aspect for you guys. I'm just saying your dreams make you nerds :)

I respect you guys for whom this is a lifelong dream. What I don't respect is the folks who don't care about the plane or flying, and just use [insert some wide body large plane] as a status symbol to bloviate to other pilots about how impressive they are in their own minds. To that, I would retort, nobody F'ing cares, not even my 9 year old. Not saying any of you all are doing that here, it's just something I've seen. It reminds me of someone bragging about their Tesla to me.
 
Last edited:
I do get that aspect for you guys. I'm just saying your dreams make you nerds :)
Guilty as charged.
I respect you guys for whom this is a lifelong dream. What I don't respect is the folks who don't care about the plane or flying, and just use [insert some wide body large plane] as a status symbol to bloviate to other pilots about how impressive they are in their own minds. To that, I would retort, nobody F'ing cares, not even my 9 year old. Not saying any of you all are doing that here, it's just something I've seen. It reminds me of someone bragging about their Tesla to me.
There is definitely some of that out there, although i'd say it's mostly on the 777. I flew the 747 and it's a footnote to my career. The MD11 is something different....
 
Guilty as charged.

There is definitely some of that out there, although i'd say it's mostly on the 777. I flew the 747 and it's a footnote to my career. The MD11 is something different....

Planning a 747 flight is still wild for me, in that aspect I can look back and say "Yes, I have worked on a 747." But more in the humbling sense, rather than arrogance. That airplane could perform, and it could teach you things.
 
Having flown all 3 airplanes, I can 100% vouch for your Toyota Camry comparison.

I left the MD when I thought they were all going away, as my schedule was crap and the future was the 767 (of course, as soon as I left, the flying improved on the MD). Sure, there's variety in the schedule now (not just EWR and PDX), but the airplane is just...there. There's no thrill or challenge of the MD. It performs well, but it's nothing compared to what I have. It's just very basic.

For someone that's always been a huge, unapologetic airplane nerd, the MD-11 (and the short time I got in the -10-30...so cool to be able to put DC-10 in my logbook!) represented a dream! Yes, I'm flying for a paycheck, but I'm getting to do it in one of the coolest, most amazing airplanes ever built!

I miss the MD dearly!
MD-11 by far was a my all time favorite to fly. Glad I got to retire on it. It was just enough of a challenge to maintain my interest and not allow myself to get sloppy. A true old school Cadillac of the skies once you mastered its flying idiosyncrasy’s. Waaay ahead of it’s time with regards to the automation and system controllers. Loved that jet!

B75/76…meh, like a Ford or Chevrolet they became somewhat bland after the initial newness wore off. B757 was a sports car and probably more fun for the pilots.

A300-600F was like the fat older sister you dated vs their super model sibling you truly lusted over. It got the job done but wasn’t pretty. While I enjoyed my time on the Bus I couldn’t wait to get off after 13 yrs, which was about how long it took to get from SDF-ONT.
 
The most fun airplane to operate for me was the Navajo. Nice handling, switching tanks, cowl flaps, mixtures, props, throttles, only a basic autopilot kept you busy. Didn’t GAF about ice, just throwing the gear handle around made you feel like you were operating heavy equipment. Managing energy and getting configured while respecting the engine cooling guidelines was a fun challenge but easy to do once you mastered it. It did break a lot and loading it could be a challenge if you were trying to maximize how much stuff you could take with a given load of passengers but again, rewarding once you had a system down.

The best airplane was the PC12. Brain dead easy to fly, great systems automation, very capable avionics, landing gear made you look like a hero every time, and everything including the kitchen sink would fit through the cargo door. The mission was awesome too, you could drop into a VFR only terrain-restricted airport just like the boys flying caravans, then load up a patient and rider, and climb up into the flight levels to go nonstop to Anchorage or Seattle. And unlike my beloved Navajo, it never broke.

The Lear 45 was my favorite though. Just a good all-around airplane, great first jet captaincy airplane, and though it didn’t have the get up and go of the 31 still reasonably fun to fly and way more reliable. Plus it had an APU, much better avionics, way more systems automation, amazing brakes, and enough gas to actually go somewhere if we went missed in Juneau. Miss it every time I go to work.

If I medicalled out tomorrow, the one thing I would not miss is the guppy. The best thing I can say about it is it’s been probably even more reliable than the PC12 (well, as long as all the doors stay on).
 
Last edited:
I loved the CASA 212. It was stable, simple, and could handle ice like a champ. Also got to do fun flying with it.
FB_IMG_1527795641108.jpg


The SAAB 340 is where I have most of my time. It was a fun airplane, and built like a tank. Couldn't climb worth a damn, but still loved it.
20170915_071600.jpg


The 777 is my first widebody jet. So it holds a special place to me. It's very enjoyable and easy to fly.
20240804_094621.jpg
 
@mikecweb @ERfly @A300Capt

As a guy who will probably never get the opportunity to fly one, besides that they look cool, what about the MD makes you speak so highly of them?
In general, just about everything!

Flying domestically the weights were such (MTOW was in the 630K range but typically flew it around 450-480K domestic weights) that it was a woefully overpowered tank of an airplane. The automatic system controllers took care of most non-normals which freed you up to concentrate on flying as priority #1. Many times you’d just grab the QRH after everything settles down and verify what was already done automatically.

Flying wise..it had very heavy control feel (ala..DC-8 type heaviness), especially roll….not so much on pitch but much more than the other fleet types. Anyone who flew Metroliners would understand what I mean. Hated it at first after 25 yrs of flying finger tip aircraft like the Boeings and Airbus but actually preferred it while hand flying IFR as it was a more stable feel.

Flying the Bus I was lucky to get .78-79 and routinely cruised in the low to mid 30’s unless you were super light. I remember climbing to FL410 in the Maddog-lemon and it was still climbing at 2000+ fpm while doing .85 and I kept having to override the autothrottles while pulling the power back to keep from exceeding redline near .86. I remember quietly smiling to myself and thinking “Wow” this ain’t the Bus.

It was a super quiet aircraft up front for the pilots. We routinely flew without headsets above FL180 while doing Mach .85 and having normal volume conversations. The quietness was actually very eerie to me at first because the Boeing (especially the freighter versions) and Bus were extremely loud with wind, packs and system noises. You don’t realize how fatiguing that can be. One other thing….gear extension on the MD produced “ZERO” noise,vibration or noticeable pitch change. My first OE flight I called “gear down”, my OE instructor lowered the gear handle and I didn’t feel the normal loud Airbus “THUNK” or feel any vibration or pitch change. After what seemed like an eternity I started seeing green gear lights one by one illuminate. I literally thought we were having gear problems but my OE instructor’s demeanor didn’t change while waiting so I figured we weren’t about to die. It took me a solid year of flying it regularly before my heart didn’t skip a beat everytime I put the gear handle down while waiting for those green lights. Anyone who has flown the Boeings or especially the Airbus knows there is no doubt the gear is coming up or down. Everything about the A300 was slow and loud…hated that.

The automation (NAV/Profile) was super smooth and very accurate and the uploading of routes, weight/balance and V-speeds was much nicer than previous FMC fleets I was on. The autopilot was extremely smooth with pitch and roll. So much so (since we flew boxes and didn’t care) we would many times override the LVL change because it was designed to not upset high dollar paying passengers or spill their drinks and took forever to make pitch changes. The MD wired the ILS like a pit bull hanging on the last bone and autolandings were eye wateringly smooth while actually being on centerline. The Bus…meh! 30’ either side of centerline was acceptable and not always pretty with a “that’s good enough” attitude from the autopilot.

V1 cuts were a piece of cake. Autopilot on at 400ft and sit back and watch it follow the engine out profile with rudder assist (parallel rudder). Special engine out procedure were in the FMC database and the jet would follow them…accurately. System controllers configured the Hyd’s, Fuel management and Bleed configs automatically while you sipped your coffee on the engine out…you know, while you contemplated deep Captain thoughts. 😜 Two engine ILS’s were identical to 3 engine ILS’s. The jet would autoland on two engines. Losing a second engine was a different monster and I won’t get into that. I still have night sweats over those sim scenarios.

Best thing about it! It just plain looked f@cking cool! I got more positive comments from folks while flying it than in my entire career prior. I never walked off the jet without looking back at the tail engine area and just thought “wow…what a cool looking beast of an airplane”. Nothing else out there looks like the MD-11 and it has aged well in a sea of different sized twin engine jets. Never paid much attention to the Bus while walking off. I thought the B757 looked sleek and sexy but never thought the B767 was cool looking. BTW…always liked the looks of the B727-200 lawn dart too as I spent time on it as a FE and FO.

Anyway…sorry for rambling on. Probably more than you wanted. Just warm memories of the Maddog.
 
In general, just about everything!

Flying domestically the weights were such (MTOW was in the 630K range but typically flew it around 450-480K domestic weights) that it was a woefully overpowered tank of an airplane. The automatic system controllers took care of most non-normals which freed you up to concentrate on flying as priority #1. Many times you’d just grab the QRH after everything settles down and verify what was already done automatically.

Flying wise..it had very heavy control feel (ala..DC-8 type heaviness), especially roll….not so much on pitch but much more than the other fleet types. Anyone who flew Metroliners would understand what I mean. Hated it at first after 25 yrs of flying finger tip aircraft like the Boeings and Airbus but actually preferred it while hand flying IFR as it was a more stable feel.

Flying the Bus I was lucky to get .78-79 and routinely cruised in the low to mid 30’s unless you were super light. I remember climbing to FL410 in the Maddog-lemon and it was still climbing at 2000+ fpm while doing .85 and I kept having to override the autothrottles while pulling the power back to keep from exceeding redline near .86. I remember quietly smiling to myself and thinking “Wow” this ain’t the Bus.

It was a super quiet aircraft up front for the pilots. We routinely flew without headsets above FL180 while doing Mach .85 and having normal volume conversations. The quietness was actually very eerie to me at first because the Boeing (especially the freighter versions) and Bus were extremely loud with wind, packs and system noises. You don’t realize how fatiguing that can be. One other thing….gear extension on the MD produced “ZERO” noise,vibration or noticeable pitch change. My first OE flight I called “gear down”, my OE instructor lowered the gear handle and I didn’t feel the normal loud Airbus “THUNK” or feel any vibration or pitch change. After what seemed like an eternity I started seeing green gear lights one by one illuminate. I literally thought we were having gear problems but my OE instructor’s demeanor didn’t change while waiting so I figured we weren’t about to die. It took me a solid year of flying it regularly before my heart didn’t skip a beat everytime I put the gear handle down while waiting for those green lights. Anyone who has flown the Boeings or especially the Airbus knows there is no doubt the gear is coming up or down. Everything about the A300 was slow and loud…hated that.

The automation (NAV/Profile) was super smooth and very accurate and the uploading of routes, weight/balance and V-speeds was much nicer than previous FMC fleets I was on. The autopilot was extremely smooth with pitch and roll. So much so (since we flew boxes and didn’t care) we would many times override the LVL change because it was designed to not upset high dollar paying passengers or spill their drinks and took forever to make pitch changes. The MD wired the ILS like a pit bull hanging on the last bone and autolandings were eye wateringly smooth while actually being on centerline. The Bus…meh! 30’ either side of centerline was acceptable and not always pretty with a “that’s good enough” attitude from the autopilot.

V1 cuts were a piece of cake. Autopilot on at 400ft and sit back and watch it follow the engine out profile with rudder assist (parallel rudder). Special engine out procedure were in the FMC database and the jet would follow them…accurately. System controllers configured the Hyd’s, Fuel management and Bleed configs automatically while you sipped your coffee on the engine out…you know, while you contemplated deep Captain thoughts. 😜 Two engine ILS’s were identical to 3 engine ILS’s. The jet would autoland on two engines. Losing a second engine was a different monster and I won’t get into that. I still have night sweats over those sim scenarios.

Best thing about it! It just plain looked f@cking cool! I got more positive comments from folks while flying it than in my entire career prior. I never walked off the jet without looking back at the tail engine area and just thought “wow…what a cool looking beast of an airplane”. Nothing else out there looks like the MD-11 and it has aged well in a sea of different sized twin engine jets. Never paid much attention to the Bus while walking off. I thought the B757 looked sleek and sexy but never thought the B767 was cool looking. BTW…always liked the looks of the B727-200 lawn dart too as I spent time on it as a FE and FO.

Anyway…sorry for rambling on. Probably more than you wanted. Just warm memories of the Maddog.
That’s an awesome write up! Thanks!
 
In general, just about everything!

Flying domestically the weights were such (MTOW was in the 630K range but typically flew it around 450-480K domestic weights) that it was a woefully overpowered tank of an airplane. The automatic system controllers took care of most non-normals which freed you up to concentrate on flying as priority #1. Many times you’d just grab the QRH after everything settles down and verify what was already done automatically.

Flying wise..it had very heavy control feel (ala..DC-8 type heaviness), especially roll….not so much on pitch but much more than the other fleet types. Anyone who flew Metroliners would understand what I mean. Hated it at first after 25 yrs of flying finger tip aircraft like the Boeings and Airbus but actually preferred it while hand flying IFR as it was a more stable feel.

Flying the Bus I was lucky to get .78-79 and routinely cruised in the low to mid 30’s unless you were super light. I remember climbing to FL410 in the Maddog-lemon and it was still climbing at 2000+ fpm while doing .85 and I kept having to override the autothrottles while pulling the power back to keep from exceeding redline near .86. I remember quietly smiling to myself and thinking “Wow” this ain’t the Bus.

It was a super quiet aircraft up front for the pilots. We routinely flew without headsets above FL180 while doing Mach .85 and having normal volume conversations. The quietness was actually very eerie to me at first because the Boeing (especially the freighter versions) and Bus were extremely loud with wind, packs and system noises. You don’t realize how fatiguing that can be. One other thing….gear extension on the MD produced “ZERO” noise,vibration or noticeable pitch change. My first OE flight I called “gear down”, my OE instructor lowered the gear handle and I didn’t feel the normal loud Airbus “THUNK” or feel any vibration or pitch change. After what seemed like an eternity I started seeing green gear lights one by one illuminate. I literally thought we were having gear problems but my OE instructor’s demeanor didn’t change while waiting so I figured we weren’t about to die. It took me a solid year of flying it regularly before my heart didn’t skip a beat everytime I put the gear handle down while waiting for those green lights. Anyone who has flown the Boeings or especially the Airbus knows there is no doubt the gear is coming up or down. Everything about the A300 was slow and loud…hated that.

The automation (NAV/Profile) was super smooth and very accurate and the uploading of routes, weight/balance and V-speeds was much nicer than previous FMC fleets I was on. The autopilot was extremely smooth with pitch and roll. So much so (since we flew boxes and didn’t care) we would many times override the LVL change because it was designed to not upset high dollar paying passengers or spill their drinks and took forever to make pitch changes. The MD wired the ILS like a pit bull hanging on the last bone and autolandings were eye wateringly smooth while actually being on centerline. The Bus…meh! 30’ either side of centerline was acceptable and not always pretty with a “that’s good enough” attitude from the autopilot.

V1 cuts were a piece of cake. Autopilot on at 400ft and sit back and watch it follow the engine out profile with rudder assist (parallel rudder). Special engine out procedure were in the FMC database and the jet would follow them…accurately. System controllers configured the Hyd’s, Fuel management and Bleed configs automatically while you sipped your coffee on the engine out…you know, while you contemplated deep Captain thoughts. 😜 Two engine ILS’s were identical to 3 engine ILS’s. The jet would autoland on two engines. Losing a second engine was a different monster and I won’t get into that. I still have night sweats over those sim scenarios.

Best thing about it! It just plain looked f@cking cool! I got more positive comments from folks while flying it than in my entire career prior. I never walked off the jet without looking back at the tail engine area and just thought “wow…what a cool looking beast of an airplane”. Nothing else out there looks like the MD-11 and it has aged well in a sea of different sized twin engine jets. Never paid much attention to the Bus while walking off. I thought the B757 looked sleek and sexy but never thought the B767 was cool looking. BTW…always liked the looks of the B727-200 lawn dart too as I spent time on it as a FE and FO.

Anyway…sorry for rambling on. Probably more than you wanted. Just warm memories of the Maddog.
Could not have said it better myself.
 
Back
Top