Richman
JC’s Resident Curmudgeon
What are the structural reasons for the US being more favorable to pilots than the EU? What is it about our unions and regulations vs theirs?
Ganas
What are the structural reasons for the US being more favorable to pilots than the EU? What is it about our unions and regulations vs theirs?
What are the structural reasons for the US being more favorable to pilots than the EU? What is it about our unions and regulations vs theirs?
I accept the unanimous report that this is the case. I am curious how things got to be that way. What's the cautionary tale?Only going by browsing PPRUNE over the years. It seems they work a lot for a whole lot less pay. Our pay and QOL (especially in the lost pandemic contract cycle) arefar greater than over there.
Up until the 1990s, each country had its own national flag carrier that was financed by the government. Obviously serving diplomatic and national interest. Then there was a push to privatize them and all that bloat and inefficiency starting to get cut. Contracts got slashed and fleets shrunk. It opened up the door for low-cost carriers that continued to undercut the higher paying jobs.What are the structural reasons for the US being more favorable to pilots than the EU? What is it about our unions and regulations vs theirs?
Much smaller aviation industries. much more public transport, licensing which requires 13 (hand)written exams at Comm/ATPL level.I accept the unanimous report that this is the case. I am curious how things got to be that way. What's the cautionary tale?
Much smaller aviation industries. much more public transport, licensing which requires 13 (hand)written exams at Comm/ATPL level.
Unfortunately an approach which UK, EU, Australia, South Africa subscribe to. Plenty of dual FAA/EASA schools in the US. Not so in Europe.Because testing the crap out of people with written exams on arcane, little used knowledge is a sure way to check for aircraft handling skills and good decision making.
This is a hallmark of a teaching/evaluation process that is way light on rigor because proper training costs money. Facilities costs money, equipment costs money, and experienced people who know WTF they’re doing costs money.
But there is plenty of hand waving to make it seem legit. Just fill out some [oversight body] paperwork and it’s the same, right?
Reminds me of the whole, if you’ll pardon the pun, hyperventilation that went on about the number of ventilators during the apocalypse. Some dusty old relic from the Crimean War, long salvaged for parts, counts the same as a state of the art unit in the US because some Euroland functionary trusted what someone else wrote down.
I love it when people try to compare processes because “hey, the paperwork checks out”
It’s been pathetic over there, many European airlines make new hires pay for their own type ratings too. Also it’s been all too common legacies take mainline planes and give them to the regional (to operate at a lower cost).
Swiss literally delivered new 777s to their regional. Lufthansa gave their regional A340s. Iberia and SAS made “express” subsidiaries and transferred mainline A320s.
It’s no wonder pilots make way less there. They’re willing to undercut one another.
I did all those dumb exams and converted my FAA ATP to an EASA (UK) ATPL. Applied to a few places and saw some even charged you to interview! NOPE
Gotta do your radiotelephony exam for sure yahThey do love critiquing our “sloppy R/T technique”, though. So they’ve got that.
I mean just not having the expense of gas and a payment on a late model pickup/SUV/sports car and driving 20 minutes out of the cul de sac to get to the grocery store/go to the gym/pick up the kids from school helps too I’m sure. Certainly it’s possible to live that life here too but my completely unscientific research of captains I fly with says most of us….don’t.Truth. Plus so many things are built-in to life over there.
I have a friend in Switzerland, though, a few bottles of wine during Expovina explained what his tax base gets him in terms of healthcare, retirement, social services and education compared to the US and here it’s just ‘a la carts’.
If he gets sick, he goes to the doctor.
If I get sick, even though I’m insured, it’s a visit to urgent care because my primary care provider is booked-out for weeks, so take on some more money for ‘concierge care’ if you want to actually see a real doctor in a timely fashion.
Landing fees. It’s all down to that…Yeah, his “city flat” was nearby the HBF and three stops from his office. And then he’d drive/train/or water ferry out to Vollenstadt on the weekends to hang out with his mom and buddies where he built a triplex and rents to other two units out.
If I get sick, even though I’m insured, it’s a visit to urgent care because my primary care provider is booked-out for weeks, so take on some more money for ‘concierge care’ if you want to actually see a real doctor in a timely fashion.
They warned us, universal health care/ACA was socialism, and that gets you Canada. And lots of unknowably accurate anecdotes from "a friend" in Canada who has to wait weeks to be seen for whatever. My wife can get our kids seen today if they need to be. But I live in a small town. You live in a big metro. Our pay to play system is not helping anyone. We have some friends who joined a healthcare co-op, where you just pay out of pocket up front. They are seen immediately, everywhere. And then the co-op reimburses whatever stuff their plan covers (the typical amount of coverage from any regular health care/insurance policy generally)