Traverse City is 1395 + examiners fee. So it comes out to like 1700 for the twin rating. Same price if you want to do the MEI with him as well. He also does seaplane ratings for $745 + examiners fee. Comes out to like 1100. Not a bad deal.
Back in Feb 2009 I conducted a survey regarding multi-engine flying on this forum. The results showed the majority of people (out of 37 total) wanted to build multi time, had their MEI, would travel out of state, and preferred safety pilot cost sharing.
I am still curious if most pilots want multi-engine safety pilot time or 'all PIC' (no safety pilot time). I know that a safety pilot can log PIC when properly rated.
With the economy the way it is, I imagine that people don't have the funds to build multi time they way they used to. But for those who have the cash or financing, how much time are you planning to fly- realistically?
He also does seaplane ratings for $745 + examiners fee. Comes out to like 1100. Not a bad deal.
and it's great you've reduced the instructor
No offense, but that is horrible idea and a horrible thing. I'm sure you know why without me rambling on and on and on and on
Dang! That is about half price on what I did mine. C-180 Amphibian.
Tom does his in a SuperCub he owns. Its a fun airplane to fly.
SE seaplane or ME seaplane?
Personally I refuse to do "quicky" MEL ratings and if I sent a "quicky" to the local examiners they would probably pull me behind the hanger and give me some wall to wall counseling. My view is that when you walk out the door with a ticket you are legal to take my kids or someone elses kids up in a twin and I want to know that you can do this safely. Yeah, some may go on to sitting in a right seat, but there is no stamp that I can have put on a MEL pilot certificate that says "can only sit in the right seat with a baby sitter". So I tell pilots to plan at least 10 hours in a 310. If they are proficient in maneuvers the first time, great. We move on and they finish faster. If they take more time getting the maneuvers down then it takes more time. There are just too many smoking holes around made by MEL pilots who were not proficient.
Also I've got a good deal of MEL time, don't need more, so if you want me to fly it will be at my rates or I won't fly. I already had one government agency try to pull the "you should fly our pilots for free" routine. Told them I'd do this as long as their pilots were not payed during training. They went elsewhere and I spent the time flying with other clients.
"Personally I refuse to do "quicky" MEL ratings"
In 2006, I bought a nice Apache with the idea of setting up a multi training program. After flying it a little, I came to the same conclusion you did, that a quicky MEL rating is a bad idea. Also, I had very little time in light twins (except the 757, inside UPS joke) and I just couldn't see signing a guy off with less than 10 hours for an IFR multi...and it could easily be more. So I just couldn't see being competitive with how most other places operate. Plus, I just didn't need the liability exposure.
Anybody interested in a nice Apache?
Dang! That is about half price on what I did mine. C-180 Amphibian.
There just isn't a big market for twin tickets. I haven't endorsed one in years./QUOTE]
I haven't had many recent multi students either.
The prices you have listed seem very competitive. These days, unless you own a multi-engine aircraft or have the need to fly one there is much less appeal to obtain the rating. For the casual weekend warrior, why fly a twin for twice the price and the same speed?
Maybe you can try marketing to a group of people who are trying to be career pilots or at some sort of an aviation institution. Those are the people that want to get all of their ratings. And fast.
The flow of ratings seems like 1) private single 2)private instrument single 3)commercial single) and finally 4)multi training with the needed add-ons.
I did my training a little differently which added up to a lot more multi time by the time the commercial was received. It is a bit more spendy because of that, but it leads to much more experience also.
1)private single 2)multi private 3)multi instrument (did most of the training in the single but then right before the checkride for a few hours we got thrown into a PA-44 to prepare for the checkride) 4)multi commercial with single add-on.
It is just an idea, but it may be a way to keep someone consistently in the twin that you have...
Personally I refuse to do "quicky" MEL ratings and if I sent a "quicky" to the local examiners they would probably pull me behind the hanger and give me some wall to wall counseling. My view is that when you walk out the door with a ticket you are legal to take my kids or someone elses kids up in a twin and I want to know that you can do this safely. Yeah, some may go on to sitting in a right seat, but there is no stamp that I can have put on a MEL pilot certificate that says "can only sit in the right seat with a baby sitter". So I tell pilots to plan at least 10 hours in a 310. If they are proficient in maneuvers the first time, great. We move on and they finish faster. If they take more time getting the maneuvers down then it takes more time. There are just too many smoking holes around made by MEL pilots who were not proficient.
Also I've got a good deal of MEL time, don't need more, so if you want me to fly it will be at my rates or I won't fly. I already had one government agency try to pull the "you should fly our pilots for free" routine. Told them I'd do this as long as their pilots were not payed during training. They went elsewhere and I spent the time flying with other clients.
1)private single 2)multi private 3)multi instrument (did most of the training in the single but then right before the checkride for a few hours we got thrown into a PA-44 to prepare for the checkride) 4)multi commercial with single add-on.
It is just an idea, but it may be a way to keep someone consistently in the twin that you have...
I think you are assuming that an MEI can't teach someone to be proficient pilot in "quick" 9-10 hours. Up "in the air" is not a place to teach things like checklist items, flows, systems and procedures. I've finished a Private Multi add-on in 6 hours, the guy spend days learning all the material that I provided to him and flew to commercial standards. It comes down to preparation; this is also a Seneca, it's a baby twin compared to some twins out there used for training. I have never signed off someone who I don't trust to fly my kid around, it's not going to start now... or ever.
They can't rent the plane (our insurance requires 10 hours), they can't really get a job with only 6 hours of multi-engine time, so I don't really see the practical point of getting it that low.