Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
I agree, but I'm sad on the wife and the professor's loss of life. Aren't you?
The Attack on the 2nd Amendment Continues
- Thread starter Hacker15e
- Start date
I agree, but I'm sad on the wife and the professor's loss of life. Aren't you?
Hacker15e
Who am I? Where are my pants?
So, are the suffocation/hanging guys "noose nutters"? The poisoning killers "chemical nutters"?
Or is it just firearms that turn otherwise perfectly normal, stable people into crazies?
How is it that we've completely lost the concept of personal responsibility, since it is the tool that is obviously to blame?
Lawman
Well-Known Member
But they made a law... Several laws even.
Obviously the solution is more laws... I mean that would stop him right? Just one more law.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
Those methods kill only the guy committing suicide, not other innocent people around you. With guns, that's not always the case.
I agree with you completely on the "lost the concept of personal responsibility." That's what I've been saying all along. Yeah it's the 2nd amendment which does not have anything in it about responsibility, safety, or even common sense. That's what a lot of these people lack when they pull the trigger.
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
Man, all of those white, old, conservative, southern redneck NRA ammosexuals are just out there causing more havoc and carnage again.
Gun culture to blame, AGAIN!
No, just goes to show you, even a foreigner who married a white woman to get a green card and subsequent US citizenship can then go and buy a gun legally and cause all sorts of problems.
The remarkable thing is his kill list was only the estranged wife and professor. Apparently the 2 people he had beef with. Even though he was on UCLA, he did not go on a random killing rampage, which as you pointed out with CA's laws, he could have easily done on a non-gun campus. But he didn't. In that regards, at least in the United States, mass shootings do tend to be Caucasian shooters - though not always.
pullup
Homewrecker
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
The Chicago situation is where BLM needs to get involved, and I don't mean against the police department.
You realize that even "exigent circumstances" needs to be shown to actually be so, otherwise it is indeed a 4th violation? It's not some free-for-all card that can be used at any time for any reason.
Hacker15e
Who am I? Where are my pants?
I think BLM could be an incredible force for good if they only directed their efforts at the right problems instead of white police officers.
TUCKnTRUCK
That guy
Of course. Given the circumstances, good chance it wou so have happened without a gun too.
While I wish he had self terminated first, not last, I also wish that the others would have had an equal opportunity to defend themselves.
bimmerphile
MCAS Meat Inhibition Logic
It's the 21st century, supercritical urinals for all
Lawman
Well-Known Member
The second they start directing that rage towards anything other than white police officers 95% of their bodies and financial support will dry up as well as the movement.
Jay Z and Beyonce aren't about to start openly criticizing the black community of Chicago or any other ghettofied city/urban center like Watts or Baltimore... Easier to just blame the system and ignore the problem/continue the cycle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lawman
Well-Known Member
New Speak is a real thing.
Look at New York going after people for the "improper labeling" of people's sexual identity.
What better way to encourage "social progress" or construct a narrative in a vacuum like the Climate Change argument than by threatening people with loss of livelihood or jail.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where were the Dems when black lives really didn't matter, during the height of the KKK?
Oh yeah, they were the KKK.
Ironically, LBJs biggest opponents to the civil rights movement, were the left led by Byrd, Thurmond and company.
A Life Aloft
Well-Known Member
But he certainly could have and/or used other methods as well. A person hell bent will do what ever it takes with whatever means available to them.
Really??? When you post stupid, idiotic, ignorant hyperbole such as this, you have no credibility whatsoever. Let's send your ass into an active shooting scenario were no one knows how many shooters there are, does not know where they are, and have no idea how they are dressed or what they look like or if they are in multiple locations, how they are armed, and precautions have to be taken to sort out the innocent and the victims, and see how you do.And as usual, the non-gun-nuts are herded up seen below in an execution-style photo................
Yeah yeah, exigent circumstances. Still looks just like those radical Islamist death squad videos about to execute a row of people.
You want to run like an idiot and you may be running right into a shooter, you do that. Me? I am parking my little ass right next to the 4 LEOs who are trained and armed to the nuts, ready to save and protect me and following their instructions.
What is wrong with you? Damn, I have seen plenty of stupid chit posted on this forum but this has to be up there in the top 5. I am just practically speechless over your complete and utterly asinine, clueless mindset. You are comparing LEOs trying to protect people, trying to ID those at the scene, protecting them and locate the shooter(s) to radical Islamist death squads. You have finally lost your tiny mind, all of your sensibilities and any connection that you may have once had with reality. I've have seen it all now.
Last edited:
trafficinsight
Well-Known Member
Well I don't know about the racist part. No word on how she feels about her children sharing bathrooms with black people... I mean what would she tell them? Oh... what if they saw someone in the bathroom who was missing a leg? or... god forbid... someone who was UGLY. She's obviously not prepared for that.
So to recap, we go off about scoreless soccer, participation trophies, and safe spaces... but when it comes to sharing a bathroom with someone who isn't like you? Oh dear won't somebody think of the children!?
trafficinsight
Well-Known Member
esa17
Well-Known Member
Now instead of burning crosses and wearing robes the Dems are pushing the "soft racism" of low expectations.
The left will champion the efforts of Democratic Party members all while telling you the Republicans and Democrats switched sides. LBJ must have become a republican shortly before saying "...by signing this I'll have those NWORDS voting for us for the next 100 years." He just must have forgotten to tell everyone he was now a republican.
They'll tell you that they're for responsible gun control yet they know nothing of the actual process of maintaining personal responsibility, everything is always someone else's fault...especially if a gun is involved. They'll count justifiable homicides, good defensive uses of a gun in their statistics telling us how evil guns are. They'll tell us that three children a day are killed with guns but won't tell us that a "child" is defined as any individual under 24 years old hiding the fact that if they narrowed their scope to children under the age of 18 then it would be one child ever 3-5 days. Standing lamps and step stools kill more kids than that and they come with removable labels.
The first concealed handgun licenses were proposed by southern...wait for it...democrats to prevent "the coloreds" from arming themselves against corruption and violence. Their words, not mine. It's funny how requiring someone to pay a fee and undergo training for a CHL is ok and doesn't overburden anyone but requiring someone to obtain a free state issued voter ID card unfairly targets minorities.
The Democrat party has pulled one hell of a trick. They're the most overtly racist political party in American politics yet they're loved by those they enslave. It's absolutely astounding how much my fellow countrymen are willing to give up in an effort to be part of the cool crowd.