Technicality Question that has probably been asked before

The FAA throws around "Careless and Reckless" like MDMA at a Deadmau5 concert.

I've had three different events where I've stared the Federal Devil in the face and each time that was their trump card.

Personally, from what I've seen when they smell blood in the water, don't dabble in any grey areas, it's just not worth it.

And if you're a professional pilot hoping to move up in the world, fly conservatively. I can't stress that enough.
 
Last edited:
The FAA throws around "Careless and Reckless" like MDNA is at a Deadmau5 concert.

I've had three different events where I've stared the Federal Devil in the face and each time that was their trump card.

Personally, from what I've seen when they smell blood in the water, don't dabble in any grey areas, it's just not worth it.

And if you're a professional pilot hoping to move up in the world, fly conservatively. I can't stress that enough.
You making up some new synthetics in your garage clandestine lab?
 
Yeah, when Feds smell blood things get real, real interesting.

One of my best friends is a Fed and, believe you me, they live in a world of fear themselves. If they DON'T bust you on something, their peers will bust them so they're going to go for the kill and they're going to find something that sticks if you give them enough rope to hang you with.

It probably sounds best in ghetto vernacular (shut up, @DPApilot), but "Da FAA don't play"
 
Yeah, when Feds smell blood things get real, real interesting.
Yet you look at operations that openly violate the regs daily, and the feds do nothing.
Or you have pilots with multiple hull losses to their name(each for willfully disregarding regs), injured people, and nothing either.
 
Yet you look at operations that openly violate the regs daily, and the feds do nothing.
Or you have pilots with multiple hull losses to their name(each for willfully disregarding regs) and nothing either.
I've got some opinions on point 1, but they're best shared off the record.
 
Yet you look at operations that openly violate the regs daily, and the feds do nothing.
Or you have pilots with multiple hull losses to their name(each for willfully disregarding regs) and nothing either.

I know.

Those other guys always have a better deal, don't they? :)
 
I also don't understand how paperwork errors are a higher priority than companies with no duty limits, or people actually crashing airplanes.

No clue. Evidence, laziness, the low-hanging fruit to pick…

The company I once worked for would "sacrifice" a pilot occasionally as the POI at the CMO would think they were being hard asses on us and would often not dig too deep into the operation.

If a small midwestern airline fired a pilot, on occasion, for being a bad boy, surely they're running a tight ship, right? :)
 
No clue. Evidence, laziness, the low-hanging fruit to pick…

The company I once worked for would "sacrifice" a pilot occasionally as the POI at the CMO would think they were being hard asses on us and would often not dig too deep into the operation.

If a small midwestern airline fired a pilot, on occasion, for being a bad boy, surely they're running a tight ship, right? :)

I have found safety to be inversely proportional to the hard ass attitude.
 
but the problem is, careless is in the eye of the beholder.

That is quite true. In matters of human behavior and judgment, black does not change to white without passing through a lot of gray. However, 14 CFR 91.13(a) is not unique as a legal requirement. I was just talking with an electrician who said that part of the code he lives with is that wires must be run "in a workman like manner". Exactly what that means is left to the judgment of the city inspector. Also, every state has similar gray area language in their laws regarding driving. As an example, driving the speed limit or less can still get a person a ticket for exceeding a "safe and prudent" speed based upon the highway conditions.
 
No clue. Evidence, laziness, the low-hanging fruit to pick…

The company I once worked for would "sacrifice" a pilot occasionally as the POI at the CMO would think they were being hard asses on us and would often not dig too deep into the operation.

If a small midwestern airline fired a pilot, on occasion, for being a bad boy, surely they're running a tight ship, right? :)
No flipping joke. Been there done that unfortunately.
 
I think @Seggy ... real easy way to hit somebody that's inbound to the airport.

Scenario, "200 foot thick fog with 1/4 mile vis". Your reasoning, "you might hit someone landing." My question...who would be landing at some class gulf field in 1/4 vis? Last I checked I haven't found any cat three approaches into kbumble****.

PS Sorry mod's, but bumble**** is a great word and needs to be exempt from your filters. <3
 
Scenario, "200 foot thick fog with 1/4 mile vis". Your reasoning, "you might hit someone landing." My question...who would be landing at some class gulf field in 1/4 vis? Last I checked I haven't found any cat three approaches into kbumble****.

PS Sorry mod's, but bumble**** is a great word and needs to be exempt from your filters. <3
The question was about departing, not landing.
 
Yes. However, the aircraft and pilot both have to be IFR capable and current.

Obviously, there are hazards associated with taking off into IMC without a clearance, to include encountering someone else who is doing the same thing.

Here is an accident report of a fellow who took off into IMC with the intention of picking up his clearance in the air before entering controlled airspace:

http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief2.aspx?ev_id=20001212X21661&ntsbno=CHI00FA276&akey=1

When faced with such a situation, a safer course of action is to obtain a void time clearance.
Good example...
 
Back
Top