PropSettin'
Low n Slow
So many winning quotes in this thread, very impressive guys!
Almost looks like the cowl wasn't secured. From looking at photos it seems the engine itself is ok.
Why are they wearing O2 masks? From the pics, it doesn't look like they had any fuselage damage large enough to cause a decompression event.
That face you make when someone suggests deploying passenger oxygen in the event of fumes in the cabin...Cabin O2 masks are ineffective against fumes and/or smoke. They mix ambient cabin air with a low flow of oxygen. Just enough to kick up the O2 level until you can descend to a lower altitude to kick up the partial pressure.
I'm guessing that the fan containment did its job, but pieces went forward and took out the inlet lip.Almost looks like the cowl wasn't secured. From looking at photos it seems the engine itself is ok.
View attachment 36267
On the ramp? Why, that's where I took the above photo!
Tell those fat bastards to get off their lazy ass and conduct a walk around when they're "pilot monitoring" that leg.
One more. Flight attendants be like, it's so hot in here, and every single passenger is like, I'm freezing!
How long of a maintenance hit did you take when the 10 rampers out of frame saw you stop to take a photo of the airplane though?
8 think, "Mmm nothing of it, 17 minutes left to get these bags off, hut hut hut"
1 thinks, "I'll ask the pilot why he took said photo,"
and then that one special snowflake goes and calls the sup over. ACE!
So if your cabin was filling with smoke, you wouldn't do smoke and fumes elimination (or whatever the 737 calls it) and drop the masks because you just equalized the px with the altitude you're flying?That face you make when someone suggests deploying passenger oxygen in the event of fumes in the cabin...
Some QRHs specifically say "WARNING: Do not deploy passenger oxygen masks."So if your cabin was filling with smoke, you wouldn't do smoke and fumes elimination (or whatever the 737 calls it) and drop the masks because you just equalized the px with the altitude your flying?
Some QRHs specifically say "WARNING: Do not deploy passenger oxygen masks."
I'd have to dig mine up, but I'm pretty sure the CRJ has you take the cabin to 8000', then descend to 10, then depressurize the rest of the way for smoke elimination. The fire hazard back there with chemical generators going off, plus the fact that pax-O2 is a "normal mode" (not 100%) type affair makes them of dubious utility for anything other than sustaining life at low pressure.
Edit:
"CAUTION: Passenger masks should not be deployed when performing smoke or fire procedures."
Carry on...
Reading now, the procedure on the CRJ to descend to 10,000' (or MEA, whichever is higher), then depressurize the cabin - IF you read the QRH, and follow the steps "strictly" in order, that is.O2 if req'd, then to 10k' I thought?
Huh, interesting. Maybe you have a different system.Mine says consider dropping the masks and only consider turning off the O2 if the fire is being fed by said O2.
The 145 (if memory serves, it's been a half-decade and 4 initial events) and 170/175 have the chemical system as well. The Brasilia was fed by a cylinder, which means we could control it using the rotary switch on the FO's sidewall.You in an Embraer? @Autothrust Blue pulled straight outta the CRJ QRH.
The 145 (if memory serves, it's been a half-decade and 4 initial events) and 170/175 have the chemical system as well. The Brasilia was fed by a cylinder, which means we could control it using the rotary switch on the FO's sidewall.