SWA catastrophic engine fail?

Why are they wearing O2 masks? From the pics, it doesn't look like they had any fuselage damage large enough to cause a decompression event.

cb31d88adbdf4c329c49530057583d6f.jpg


You know its called skin for a reason right? It doesn't take much to puncture the pressure vessel.
 
Cabin O2 masks are ineffective against fumes and/or smoke. They mix ambient cabin air with a low flow of oxygen. Just enough to kick up the O2 level until you can descend to a lower altitude to kick up the partial pressure.
That face you make when someone suggests deploying passenger oxygen in the event of fumes in the cabin...
 
View attachment 36267

On the ramp? Why, that's where I took the above photo! :)

Tell those fat bastards to get off their lazy ass and conduct a walk around when they're "pilot monitoring" that leg.

How long of a maintenance hit did you take when the 10 rampers out of frame saw you stop to take a photo of the airplane though?

8 think, "Mmm nothing of it, 17 minutes left to get these bags off, hut hut hut"
1 thinks, "I'll ask the pilot why he took said photo,"
and then that one special snowflake goes and calls the sup over. ACE!
 
The fan looks relatively intact, I wonder if the engine was vibrating badly enough before they shut it down that it caused a structural failure of the cowl? I honestly can't think of another reason the inlet might fall off. Also that duct that's hanging in the wind would be for inlet anti-ice, with it wide open that could contribute to their depressurization issue. Of course I've only ever seen the inlet anti-ice shut-off valve mounted inside the inlet on Learjets, every other manufacturer realizes that valves fail and they need to be changed periodically.:mad:
 
How long of a maintenance hit did you take when the 10 rampers out of frame saw you stop to take a photo of the airplane though?

8 think, "Mmm nothing of it, 17 minutes left to get these bags off, hut hut hut"
1 thinks, "I'll ask the pilot why he took said photo,"
and then that one special snowflake goes and calls the sup over. ACE!

LOL. WUT? :)
 
That face you make when someone suggests deploying passenger oxygen in the event of fumes in the cabin...
So if your cabin was filling with smoke, you wouldn't do smoke and fumes elimination (or whatever the 737 calls it) and drop the masks because you just equalized the px with the altitude you're flying?
 
Last edited:
So if your cabin was filling with smoke, you wouldn't do smoke and fumes elimination (or whatever the 737 calls it) and drop the masks because you just equalized the px with the altitude your flying?
Some QRHs specifically say "WARNING: Do not deploy passenger oxygen masks."

I'd have to dig mine up, but I'm pretty sure the CRJ has you take the cabin to 8000', then descend to 10, then depressurize the rest of the way for smoke elimination. The fire hazard back there with chemical generators going off, plus the fact that pax-O2 is a "normal mode" (not 100%) type affair makes them of dubious utility for anything other than sustaining life at low pressure.

Edit:

"CAUTION: Passenger masks should not be deployed when performing smoke or fire procedures."

Carry on...
 
Some QRHs specifically say "WARNING: Do not deploy passenger oxygen masks."

I'd have to dig mine up, but I'm pretty sure the CRJ has you take the cabin to 8000', then descend to 10, then depressurize the rest of the way for smoke elimination. The fire hazard back there with chemical generators going off, plus the fact that pax-O2 is a "normal mode" (not 100%) type affair makes them of dubious utility for anything other than sustaining life at low pressure.

Edit:

"CAUTION: Passenger masks should not be deployed when performing smoke or fire procedures."

Carry on...

O2 if req'd, then to 10k' I thought?
 
O2 if req'd, then to 10k' I thought?
Reading now, the procedure on the CRJ to descend to 10,000' (or MEA, whichever is higher), then depressurize the cabin - IF you read the QRH, and follow the steps "strictly" in order, that is.

Unfortunately, this guy wrote the QRH:
latest

There is a big angry admonition about (1) land the jet, and (2) don't deploy passenger oxygen at the start of the Smoke/Fire/Fumes section.

The flight crew, with smoke or fumes in the cabin, will be on 100% the whole time; again, the pax oxygen other than keeping partial pressure up to keep your physiology going doesn't do anything for fumes or smoke.
 
Mine says consider dropping the masks and only consider turning off the O2 if the fire is being fed by said O2.
 
The 145 (if memory serves, it's been a half-decade and 4 initial events) and 170/175 have the chemical system as well. The Brasilia was fed by a cylinder, which means we could control it using the rotary switch on the FO's sidewall.

I nuked my post because I didn't think there were mechanical differences between the two in retrospect.

HOWEVER I am wondering if @alphaone is citing another section of their shop's QRH...? (Having now just flipped to electrical fires)
 
Back
Top