So, how bad is your carrier melting down...

Sounds like jump-seaters should be able to bump revenue passengers as policy then, no?

It's only an issue on RJs usually. Most mainline aircraft have the jumpseat(s) and their occupant(s) counted as part of the aircraft's BOW so there is no such thing as bumping a jumpseater for weight.

And regarding jumpseaters bumping revenue passengers, if said jumpseater's airline is staffed properly (and it's not the 10th straight day of snowstorm) there should be a reserve to cover the flight if he can't commute in.
 
Sounds like jump-seaters should be able to bump revenue passengers as policy then, no?

Sometimes, they can.

Not common, but once in a while, when the stuff has really hit the fan (like the last few days), one can call crew scheduling and be proactive and say "It looks like my commute is not going to work out despite my best efforts...any way you can positive space me in to work?"

And if the situation at the hub is bad enough, they sometimes do buy a seat for the commuter to get in. Thus making a jumpseater bump a revenue passenger in order to prevent a flight or two or three at the hub later in the day get canceled.
 
The juice from a wife of one of the JetBlue company supporters is that the operations over the past few days made operations safer and less chaotic!
 
I know I'm an outsider here, but my understanding is that airliners fly to get paying customers to their destinations, not to transport pilots for free, no?

Yes, exactly my point.

And his argument is if you don't get that jumpseater on then the flight that guy was suppose to do could cancel. One, as a jumpseater it is his responsibility to show up to work on time and ready, even if it means having to go earlier than usual due to high volume of traffic. Two, the airlines should have reserves to cover a flight that a commuter might miss.
 
The thing is, that jumpseater who might not get on due to the jumpseat becoming unavailable, might be the only one to operate the flight that they're jumpseating to get to.

This has been the case a lot in the last few days, I'm sure.

Well then that's poor jumpseat planning on that pilot's behalf. Hopefully he had at least 3 options to get to work (or whatever is the contractual requirement). But come on, Hercules was in the news for quite some time and anyone with common sense would know that coming in a little earlier than normal would be a better idea.

DHing is pretty much a necessity for the airlines to work.
JSing is a necessity as well since many bases just aren't financially feasible to live in. Try to be based at JFK/EWR/LGA and live in base. Not easy since there is no such thing as a "cost of living adjustment" in the airlines. Not to mention people get moved around all the time and moving every time a base change occurs is a bit excessive, especially at the regionals.

DHing is a necessity for the airline to work and usually is done ahead of time and already 'sold' as a ticketed seat. The problem happens during IROPs when confirmed passengers are getting left behind, screwed, and now desperate to get to their destination, AND the airline also needs to send pilots along too. Yes, you can demand your contractual seat in the back. But if a GST tells me (and I know for fact) that me taking the jumpseat opens up my seat in the back to a confirmed revenue passenger who has already been stranded, then yes I will do it... even for a transcon.
 
Yes, exactly my point.

And his argument is if you don't get that jumpseater on then the flight that guy was suppose to do could cancel. One, as a jumpseater it is his responsibility to show up to work on time and ready, even if it means having to go earlier than usual due to high volume of traffic. Two, the airlines should have reserves to cover a flight that a commuter might miss.

But what we are discussing here, and all that this thread was a discussion about in the first place, was that with 117 now in effect and a blizzard going on for days in the region where a lot of passengers O&D, is having some issues.


One, as a jumpseater it is his responsibility to show up to work on time and ready, even if it means having to go earlier than usual due to high volume of traffic.

Sometimes a jumpseater shows up with literally half a dozen flights to get them to work and something happens on each and every flight so that they do not get on. There can even be seats open a few hours prior, and on-time departures posted up until boarding time, and then and only then does it all start to unravel.

Two, the airlines should have reserves to cover a flight that a commuter might miss.

As has been mentioned above, this particular scenario regarding positive space is all about when those reserves have been depleted, for whatever reason.

So, in that case -- the positive space option is sometimes used.
 
Sounds like jump-seaters should be able to bump revenue passengers as policy then, no?

When things really get bad at my company and they estimate severe IROPs (eg, the Asiana crash) then the company provides positive space (confirmed) tickets to commuting pilots from any VX destination. They do this while still properly dealing with stranded guests and taking care of them too. Usually, our policy is to allow them to rebook plus/minus a few days of the storm/event and most people just do that themselves. That's why when I flew on Thursday morning before Hercules hit, my flight was suppose to be completely full but then in the end we had roughly 30-40 seats open because some people decided to go either a day earlier or a couple days later. More choices for the consumer equals a happier consumer.
 
Well then that's poor jumpseat planning on that pilot's behalf. Hopefully he had at least 3 options to get to work (or whatever is the contractual requirement). But come on, Hercules was in the news for quite some time and anyone with common sense would know that coming in a little earlier than normal would be a better idea.

It's not poor planning at all.

Where I work, (and I don't commute), commuters who wish to use the protections of the commuter clause must give themselves two flights with seats open that will get them there by report time.

As someone who drives to work, I see little incentive for the commuting folks I fly with to give themselves more than what the contract requires. One, because usually it works out somehow. And two, if it doesn't, they probably don't have a chronic track record of attendance problems, so it's no big deal. Three, FOs don't make enough to care about the slight hit in credit. And four, the positive space thing is still there if it's looking really bad for covering the flight.
 
I'm in Oregon unfortunately.......so SFO is the big connection out of Eugene getting us anywhere via United....that or Denver, which seems to be sold out. I did look at just buying tickets with other carriers out of PDX, and most didn't even have seats before Tues, and the ones that did were in like 4 hrs from now for $1300 so I guess it isn't worth that to me. I did think about seeing if 1st class upgrade could open some seats, but I can only imagine what kind of expense that would entail with this sort of turnaround. Whatever though, it is what it is. Work has been cool about it
Ahhh! I thought you were at Lemoore?
 
It's not poor planning at all.

Where I work, (and I don't commute), commuters who wish to use the protections of the commuter clause must give themselves two flights with seats open that will get them there by report time.

As someone who drives to work, I see little incentive for the commuting folks I fly with to give themselves more than what the contract requires. One, because usually it works out somehow. And two, if it doesn't, they probably don't have a chronic track record of attendance problems, so it's no big deal. Three, FOs don't make enough to care about the slight hit in credit. And four, the positive space thing is still there if it's looking really bad for covering the flight.

It is.

I flew on Thursday morning before Hercules hit. A couple days earlier, our airline sent out a heads up email about Hercules (as if you didn't know it was coming) and it was obvious that airline operations would get screwed up in the storm. My CA for that trip commuted from CLT and he came up the day prior on a morning flight just to make sure he'd get there. He said usually for that trip he could come in the evening before the trip but he wanted to give extra time to be safe. Now you can go ahead and try and risk just two flights before show time, but I guarantee you will be through your max allowed per rolling 12 months for commute misses. A carpet dance will ensue (as it should if you can't show up to work on time).
 
JSing is a necessity as well since many bases just aren't financially feasible to live in. Try to be based at JFK/EWR/LGA and live in base. Not easy since there is no such thing as a "cost of living adjustment" in the airlines. Not to mention people get moved around all the time and moving every time a base change occurs is a bit excessive, especially at the regionals.

That's precisely what I am. My base is NYC (I cover both EWR and JFK, and rumors soon to be LGA). I live in NJ and drive to both airports. I wouldn't move for regionals because those bases open/close all the time. But once you're at a Major with large bases, it's a different story.
 
:rolleyes:

That mindset carries into other aspects.

Look, maybe you aren't getting what I'm saying.

Their mindset is not that they don't give a crap about anything.

Rather, it is basically about statistics and diminishing returns.

If someone gives themselves two flights to get to work that meet the criteria for the commuter clause, they still might have to use that clause and miss the first half a day of work or whatever.

There are guys are girls commuting from some outstation to some hub that have nothing but CRJ-200s all day long. These pilots could give themselves five flights to get to work and they still might end up no-showing because the day's flights become essentially unusable, due to weight restrictions, passengers being dumped onto those flights from other flights last minute, the list goes on.

So if two flights gets them off the hook as long as they don't perpetually do this week after week all year long, then why on earth would they give themselves four or five flights when they still could very well get a no-show? Then all they'd end up with is a no-show and a full day off blown putzing around with stupid weight restricted CRJs.

I'm just thankful I've been able to drive to work the last few years and not worry about it. But there's your explanation to what I'm talking about.
 
I give myself two flights to get to work. We are guaranteed the Jumpseat and can reserve it 7 days prior. 5 years of 121 I've never had to use my commuter clause, but have been positive spaces during bad storms.

During Hercules it was on a DHD from PHL-CLT on a 767 and it was half crew members.
 
Back
Top