trafficinsight
Well-Known Member
Verdict is out in my opinion on whether that's actually better or not.Just different training philosophy. They don't need you to be able to build the airplane.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Verdict is out in my opinion on whether that's actually better or not.Just different training philosophy. They don't need you to be able to build the airplane.
If I can't troubleshoot it from my seat, I don't really need to know how it works from an engineering perspective.Verdict is out in my opinion on whether that's actually better or not.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Don't. Trust me. You'll be fine.
This isn't the CRJ.
-Fox
CRJ harder to learn to fly, than ERJ?
That's news!
Systems knowledge isn't engineering.If I can't troubleshoot it from my seat, I don't really need to know how it works from an engineering perspective.
I have not heard from 1 person who has been through both programs, myself included, that did not find the ERJ program to be superior in every way.Systems knowledge isn't engineering.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I have not heard from 1 person who has been through both programs, myself included, that did not find the ERJ program to be superior in every way.
There's always one I guess.The person you're responding to has been through both programs.
-Fox
Absolutely. I was like you, wanting to get a head start, nervous, excited...It sounds like I should just enjoy my time off while I have it. I was originally trying to take an earlier class date on the CRJ (per advice on this thread) in September but both CRJ and ERJ classes for the month were full and my name came up on the waitlist for the October class.
I remember having a packet ahead of time years ago at my last gig with something like 15-17 checklist and limitation memory items for the CRJ 200. I understand they've now nixed most or all memory items to learn ahead of time on the CRJ too.
I mean, personally I do agree with you, but I haven't been through both. But I also think that they could have delved a teeny bit further into systems knowledge without risking anything. The high-altitude / low-altitude modes of the radar, alone, explain why it works so poorly up high and so well down low... and nobody really knows about them. There are lots of little things like that.There's always one I guess.
I mean, personally I do agree with you, but I haven't been through both. But I also think that they could have delved a teeny bit further into systems knowledge without risking anything. The high-altitude / low-altitude modes of the radar, alone, explain why it works so poorly up high and so well down low... and nobody really knows about them. There are lots of little things like that.
Anyway, I like the overall philosophy much better on the 175, from what I've seen.
-Fox
I think you'll find most pilot type people equate easy with good. It is quite easy. I'm just not convinced it's as good.I have not heard from 1 person who has been through both programs, myself included, that did not find the ERJ program to be superior in every way.
That's not my point at all though. I didn't find the CRJ course to be difficult at all. I just felt there was an immense amount of time wasted on minutia.I think you'll find most pilot type people equate easy with good. It is quite easy. I'm just not convinced it's as good.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Neither was difficult, but one was comprehensive.That's not my point at all though. I didn't find the CRJ course to be difficult at all. I just felt there was an immense amount of time wasted on minutia.
Well I don't know if sponge bob was a thing when you went through CRJ training, but I wanted to shoot myself that day.Neither was difficult, but one was comprehensive.
I mean, why require anyone to learn anything about the systems at all? Push button, receive bacon.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Hmm, I vaguely remember something about that.Well I don't know if sponge bob was a thing when you went through CRJ training, but I wanted to shoot myself that day.
How long ago was that?I do feel like both programs were good. I actually was not a fan of the whole free range afternoons in ERJ class. Felt some of that time could have been spent going a little deeper. I just felt the ERJ program as a whole was run better. Everyone in that department seems to be on the same page.
CRJ was just over 3 years ago, ERJ was just over 2.How long ago was that?
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk