surreal1221
Well-Known Member
Ugly.
what?Ugly.
they need to put a training wheel back there...can we say tailstrike
Ugly.
Is that the same prototype airplane they have already spliced together twice to make the -700 and the -900 from the origional 200?
insideout said:The 7 and 9 are actually different airframes than the 200. The 200 is the only frame of a 605 that is stretched.
They built the 7 from the ground up, closely relating it to the 200 (some systems, but same cockpit minus some improvements) and then stretched that for the 9 and 1000.
Those damned -900s already stick half way out into the lanes on the ATL ramp as it is. This thing could practically touch the next concourse over. Once your airplane is longer than a DC-9-50, it's time to stop including the letters "RJ" in the name.
Those damned -900s already stick half way out into the lanes on the ATL ramp as it is. This thing could practically touch the next concourse over. Once your airplane is longer than a DC-9-50, it's time to stop including the letters "RJ" in the name.
Once you start flying from IND-FLL, it's time to stop including the letters "RJ." Unless the "regional" in "regional jet" means the region of North America.
The 7 and 9 are actually different airframes than the 200. The 200 is the only frame of a 605 that is stretched.
They built the 7 from the ground up, closely relating it to the 200 (some systems, but same cockpit minus some improvements) and then stretched that for the 9 and 1000.
Ugly.
Sounds like DTW.
It shocked me the first time I saw that on the board in DTW. I'd hate to get one of the seats that doesn't recline like row 12 by the bathroom.My personal RJ record: DTW-AUS at 4:04. The 717 couldn't even make that flight at long-range cruise and be legal. Absolutely ridiculous for an RJ to be doing it.
It shocked me the first time I saw that on the board in DTW. I'd hate to get one of the seats that doesn't recline like row 12 by the bathroom.