I'm not a member of this or any union but I see things like this a LOT on JC. Why do you, as pilots/members, support stuff like this?............................. Not to beat a dead horse but ALPA messed up bad on the augmented crew concessions.
We can run anywhere from 10-14 hour legs in a single across the Atlantic. It's tough but easily managable. What we're not seeing in this discussion is all the time spent by any of these pilots PRIOR to the door closing (i.e. sleep dep getting to work, delays, commute, etc). These are bigger issues....IMHO
Valid point..........That would be fatiguing in a single, but you wouldn't do it all the time. Constant redeye international ops really takes its toll on your body in a number of different ways. The non-scheduled side of long-haul can be especially tough; I've done several 3am westbound departures out of Europe where you don't see the sun for 10 hours.
I'm not a member of this or any union but I see things like this a LOT on JC. Why do you, as pilots/members, support stuff like this?
We can run anywhere from 10-14 hour legs in a single across the Atlantic. It's tough but easily managable. What we're not seeing in this discussion is all the time spent by any of these pilots PRIOR to the door closing (i.e. sleep dep getting to work, delays, commute, etc). These are bigger issues....IMHO
Not to beat a dead horse but ALPA messed up bad on the augmented crew concessions.
Cav, we differ in that I perform my flights, whether alone or full, with only one thought: Self-preservation. I don't worry about the people in the back as far as thier "survival", it's mine I worry about. If I make it safe, so do they. However, you are right about the paper, mine wouldn't even make this page......Two entirely different scenarios. In one scenario you are responsible for the life of one person and the other you are responsible for 200+. I don't mean to be harsh but if you screw up, it might make the local paper. I have an infinite respect for pilots who conduct the types of operations you are describing because their balls are much bigger than my own but no one in their right mind considers it a normal operation and there is no way the pilot you describe is 100% after being at the controls for 10-14 hours. Airlines, the FAA, and the public expect a zero sum game. Furthermore, I commuted in over 24 hrs in advance for the flight so my commute was not the issue for me or any other member of the crew.
In the industry, you and this conduct, are exceptions............................................Furthermore, I commuted in over 24 hrs in advance for the flight so my commute was not the issue for me or any other member of the crew.
How so?
Valid point..........
But, how many back-to-back long-hauls OR how many in a month are the airline crews required to do?
Because I still fear the law of unintended consequences by extending unaugmented flight times. Yes I understand that it's hard time but I'm still not convinced it's going to be implemented as we hope. I'm sure you disagree and that's fine, I hope you are correct.
You doing TOE?Thanks! Enjoying it so far.
Of course the media is hard at work putting their spin on this. CNN was saying it was the FO who did it and made mention he was having his 40 min recommended rest but had been away for 75 minutes. They way they made it sound was that the cockpit was unoccupied.
Of course the media is hard at work putting their spin on this. CNN was saying it was the FO who did it and made mention he was having his 40 min recommended rest but had been away for 75 minutes. They way they made it sound was that the cockpit was unoccupied.
Then how about waiting to see if your prediction is true before claiming that ALPA "messed up bad?"
You doing TOE?