FlyChicaga
Vintage Restoration
Reality is not negativity. It has been widely reported that the loss of some flying has left Xjet with 44 airplanes that are under, if not, unutilized.
Hence, the introduction of "new flying" like GEG-SAC, GEG-ONT, etc. No one says you're not working hard, its just readily apparent that Xjet management is scrambling to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to do with excess capacity.
If they don't discover it soon, furloughs are the inevitable next step.
Good luck!
Not quite. Our management has been looking for a reason to do our own flying for quite a while. In fact, long ago our management realized that the new Continental penny pinchers were likely to reduce the amount of lift we provide, so they began doing research on routes that would be good to utilize our 50-seaters. This is what they came up with: http://www.xjet.com. In fact, listening to our CEO speak many times, he wishes Continental would give us back all 274 airframes so we are not tied to that company any longer.
We will have many ups and downs in the coming months and years, but right now I'm very cautiously optimistic about this whole deal. This is definitely not the same as the Independence Air debacle at all. I'd say we have as much spirit as they did starting out, and they lasted about two years. Us, we are using only 44 jets, supplemented by 205 jets in the Continental system, 10 in the Delta system, and another 15 doing very, very lucrative charter operations.
From what I've seen and heard walking through the halls of our training center in Houston, and listening to our CEO and upper management speak in person, I am totally on board with what they are doing. As I said last week to a new-hire class, I'm not drinking the kool-aid right now, I'm sniffing it. No point in diluting it. That doesn't mean myself or any other pilot should be a pushover, because we still have to make a living in this career. But if I can making a living by working hard to watch this company grow, then by all means I'll do so.
Maybe your pessimism is due to the misperception that we are yet another LCC on the market. That is not true. Our flying is tailored to the business traveler who is willing to pay a premium for direct service. Of course we still must stay competitive in terms of ticket prices, especially starting out.
This will all probably be disregarded as psycho-babble, and that is fine (especially since this week I'm helping fly for those "scabs" at jetBlue, the horror! I know how you hate them so). I am going to one of our branded bases in May to start flying those 44 teal- and grey-colored airplanes, working my ass off to hopefully make this successful. Come 2009 when Continental is slated to return another 51 airplanes, I hope they will be used to open some more lucrative routes to bring our branded flying fleet up to 95.
I don't think that any pilot on our seniority list isn't aware of the challenges and risks that face us. There is nothing wrong with our optimism. I'm not sure what you wanted us to do... give up the airplanes to Chautauqua, furlough pilots, and shut down the training department? That would be a definitely good move for "raising the bar" in the industry, wouldn't it? Submission? Great idea.
I guess