Boris Badenov
Fortis Leader
And here I am sober. Tragic.
Thats what I thought too but how do you explain the whole Republic fiasco and their ownership of Frontier? I know it's been sold but during the time of ownership I couldn't understand how Delta's contract didn't prohibit that?Actually, your right and wrong. While not specifically prohibiting Skywest from operating E195s for Emirates, doing so would place them in violation of the Delta PWA section 1. As such, they would not be allowed to operate as a DCI carrier if they went that route. The question is, which would pay them more money? Continue to fly for Delta, or walk away from DCI, and become a regional feed for Emirates.
Or United's. They flew the same routes. One with E170's and the other with Airbus/E190's.Thats what I thought too but how do you explain the whole Republic fiasco and their ownership of Frontier? I know it's been sold but during the time of ownership I couldn't understand how Delta's contract didn't prohibit that?
And here I am sober. Tragic.
Norwegian Air International, a subsidiary of a Norwegian airline, has headquartered its operations in Ireland to take advantage of a lower labor and regulatory environment—counter to U.S. law and the U.S.-EU Air Transport Agreement, or Open Skies. NAI’s business plan calls for hiring pilots under individual contracts through a Singapore hiring company, will base them in Thailand and fly between Europe and the United States—but will bypass Ireland. NAI has no plans to fly to or from Ireland, which raises significant questions about the safety oversight of its operations. ALPA, U.S., and European labor groups, U.S. and European passenger carriers, and nearly 150 bipartisan members of Congress have weighed in with the U.S. Department of Transportation with concerns about NAI’s proposal.
As early as Monday, June 16, the U.S. Senate begins consideration of the FY 2015 Transportation Appropriations bill (S. 2438). Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) will offer an amendment to prohibit the DOT from using federal funds to approve any foreign air carrier permit unless it subscribes to U.S. law and the labor provisions contained in Article 17 bis of the U.S.-EU Air Transport Agreement.
The NAI scheme threatens the future of the U.S. aviation industry and your job. Tell your senator to Deny NAI and vote in favor of the Schatz Amendment! Take action below AND call your senators now! The Capitol switchboard number is 202-224-3121.
ALPA’s president, Captain Lee Moak, wrote to the Senate in support of the Schatz Amendment to Deny NAI! Now it is time for senators to hear from all pilots. Send a message to your senator to let them know that our jobs are on the line and they should Deny NAI!
Can you provide a link to Article 17 because the one I found was this?
Article 17 of the U.S. EU Air Transport Agreement has to do with Computer Reservation Systems .
TP
Article 17 bis of the U.S.‐European/Norway/Iceland Air Transport Agreement (ATA): The Social Clause
1. The Parties recognise that the importance of the social dimension of the Agreement and the benefits that arise when open markets are accompanied by high labor standards. The opportunities created by the Agreement are not intended to undermine labour standards or the labour‐related rights and principles contained in the Parties’s respective laws.
2. The principles in paragraph 1 shall guide the Parties as they implement the Agreement, including regular consideration by the Joint Committee, pursuant to Article 18, of the social effects of the Agreement and the development of appropriate responses to concerns found to be legitimate.
DOT “Public Interest” Statute
Title 49 – TRANSPORTATION
SUBTITLE VII - AVIATION PROGRAMS
PART A - AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY
subpart ii - economic regulation
CHAPTER 413 - FOREIGN AIR TRANSPORTATION
§41302. Permits of foreign air carriers
The Secretary of Transportation may issue a permit to a person (except a citizen of the United States) authorizing the person to provide foreign air transportation as a foreign air carrier if the Secretary finds that—
(1) the person is fit, willing, and able to provide the foreign air transportation to be authorized by the permit and to comply with this part and regulations of the Secretary; and
(2)(A) the person is qualified, and has been designated by the government of its country, to provide the foreign air transportation under an agreement with the United States Government; or
(B) the foreign air transportation to be provided under the permit will be in the public interest.
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1126.)
§40101. Policy
(a) Economic Regulation.—In carrying out subpart II of this part and those provisions of subpart IV applicable in carrying out subpart II, the Secretary of Transportation shall consider the following matters, among others, as being in the public interest and consistent with public convenience and necessity:
(1) assigning and maintaining safety as the highest priority in air commerce.
(2) before authorizing new air transportation services, evaluating the safety implications of those services.
(3) preventing deterioration in established safety procedures, recognizing the clear intent, encouragement, and dedication of Congress to further the highest degree of safety in air transportation and air commerce, and to maintain the safety vigilance that has evolved in air transportation and air commerce and has come to be expected by the traveling and shipping public.
(4) the availability of a variety of adequate, economic, efficient, and low-priced services without unreasonable discrimination or unfair or deceptive practices.
(5) coordinating transportation by, and improving relations among, air carriers, and encouraging fair wages and working conditions.
(6) placing maximum reliance on competitive market forces and on actual and potential competition—
(A) to provide the needed air transportation system; and
(B) to encourage efficient and well-managed air carriers to earn adequate profits and attract capital, considering any material differences between interstate air transportation and foreign air transportation.
(7) developing and maintaining a sound regulatory system that is responsive to the needs of the public and in which decisions are reached promptly to make it easier to adapt the air transportation system to the present and future needs of—
(A) the commerce of the United States;
(B) the United States Postal Service; and
(C) the national defense.
(8) encouraging air transportation at major urban areas through secondary or satellite airports if consistent with regional airport plans of regional and local authorities, and if endorsed by appropriate State authorities—
(A) encouraging the transportation by air carriers that provide, in a specific market, transportation exclusively at those airports; and
(B) fostering an environment that allows those carriers to establish themselves and develop secondary or satellite airport services.
(9) preventing unfair, deceptive, predatory, or anticompetitive practices in air transportation.
(10) avoiding unreasonable industry concentration, excessive market domination, monopoly powers, and other conditions that would tend to allow at least one air carrier or foreign air carrier unreasonably to increase prices, reduce services, or exclude competition in air transportation.
(11) maintaining a complete and convenient system of continuous scheduled interstate air transportation for small communities and isolated areas with direct financial assistance from the United States Government when appropriate.
(12) encouraging, developing, and maintaining an air transportation system relying on actual and potential competition—
(A) to provide efficiency, innovation, and low prices; and
(B) to decide on the variety and quality of, and determine prices for, air transportation services.
(13) encouraging entry into air transportation markets by new and existing air carriers and the continued strengthening of small air carriers to ensure a more effective and competitive airline industry.
(14) promoting, encouraging, and developing civil aeronautics and a viable, privately-owned United States air transport industry.
(15) strengthening the competitive position of air carriers to at least ensure equality with foreign air carriers, including the attainment of the opportunity for air carriers to maintain and increase their profitability in foreign air transportation.
(16) ensuring that consumers in all regions of the United States, including those in small communities and rural and remote areas, have access to affordable, regularly scheduled air service.
It just warms my heart when this happens to companies like NAS. Even if it's only a battle won.
Well, I guess there goes that argument.![]()