Next 48 Hours Critical in Denying NAI and their application

Actually, your right and wrong. While not specifically prohibiting Skywest from operating E195s for Emirates, doing so would place them in violation of the Delta PWA section 1. As such, they would not be allowed to operate as a DCI carrier if they went that route. The question is, which would pay them more money? Continue to fly for Delta, or walk away from DCI, and become a regional feed for Emirates.
Thats what I thought too but how do you explain the whole Republic fiasco and their ownership of Frontier? I know it's been sold but during the time of ownership I couldn't understand how Delta's contract didn't prohibit that?
 
There's always been bickering on this site and just about every site on the net since the beginning of time. I must say though, it's getting really irritating lately because the level of bickering is getting in a lot of threads by the same people and it's wasting everyones time. I come on here mostly to see cool things, learn new stuff, and kick tires with people who share a common interest. You guys seriously need to tone it down a little.
 
Thats what I thought too but how do you explain the whole Republic fiasco and their ownership of Frontier? I know it's been sold but during the time of ownership I couldn't understand how Delta's contract didn't prohibit that?
Or United's. They flew the same routes. One with E170's and the other with Airbus/E190's.
 
The 2nd part of this Call to Action is now 'live'....


Norwegian Air International, a subsidiary of a Norwegian airline, has headquartered its operations in Ireland to take advantage of a lower labor and regulatory environment—counter to U.S. law and the U.S.-EU Air Transport Agreement, or Open Skies. NAI’s business plan calls for hiring pilots under individual contracts through a Singapore hiring company, will base them in Thailand and fly between Europe and the United States—but will bypass Ireland. NAI has no plans to fly to or from Ireland, which raises significant questions about the safety oversight of its operations. ALPA, U.S., and European labor groups, U.S. and European passenger carriers, and nearly 150 bipartisan members of Congress have weighed in with the U.S. Department of Transportation with concerns about NAI’s proposal.

As early as Monday, June 16, the U.S. Senate begins consideration of the FY 2015 Transportation Appropriations bill (S. 2438). Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) will offer an amendment to prohibit the DOT from using federal funds to approve any foreign air carrier permit unless it subscribes to U.S. law and the labor provisions contained in Article 17 bis of the U.S.-EU Air Transport Agreement.

The NAI scheme threatens the future of the U.S. aviation industry and your job. Tell your senator to Deny NAI and vote in favor of the Schatz Amendment! Take action below AND call your senators now! The Capitol switchboard number is 202-224-3121.

ALPA’s president, Captain Lee Moak, wrote to the Senate in support of the Schatz Amendment to Deny NAI! Now it is time for senators to hear from all pilots. Send a message to your senator to let them know that our jobs are on the line and they should Deny NAI!

Please go to www.alpa.org to participate and call/write your Senator!
 
Can you provide a link to Article 17 because the one I found was this?

Article 17 of the U.S. EU Air Transport Agreement has to do with Computer Reservation Systems .


TP
 
Interesting development yesterday:

press release from Norwegian

Norwegian has today received approval from The Civil Aviation Authority in Norway to move all of its 787 aircraft from the Norwegian subsidiary Norwegian Long Haul (NLH) to Norwegian Air Shuttle (NAS). One 787 Dreamliner will, as before, remain in Norwegian Air International (NAI).

There are several reasons why Norwegian has chosen to make this move, says Geir Steiro, Norwegian’s COO; new EASA regulations, the need for an overflight permit from Russia and the fact the NAS already has the approval to fly between Europe and the U.S.

Another reason for the transfer is the need for overflight permit from Russia. The Russian authorities do not allow wetlease over Russian airspace, and while NLH is a wet lease operator, NAS is not. This means that we hopefully soon will be allowed to fly over Russian airspace en route to Bangkok, which will save 40-50 minutes per flight with the Dreamliner because we will not have to take the detour around the Crimean peninsula,” Geir continues.

With this transfer, the aircraft will be placed in an AOC with permission from the U.S. authorities. Also NLH has had this permit, while our Irish subsidiary Norwegian Air International is still waiting for the approval from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Norwegian has not considered applying for registration in Norway. All our long-haul aircraft will remain on Irish register.

Apparently one of the consequences is that they do not have to wait for the DOT approval now. Service will begin from Gatwick the first week of July.



Typhoonpilot
 
Can you provide a link to Article 17 because the one I found was this?

Article 17 of the U.S. EU Air Transport Agreement has to do with Computer Reservation Systems .


TP

Bolded is my emphasis...

Article 17 bis of the U.S.‐European/Norway/Iceland Air Transport Agreement (ATA): The Social Clause


1. The Parties recognise that the importance of the social dimension of the Agreement and the benefits that arise when open markets are accompanied by high labor standards. The opportunities created by the Agreement are not intended to undermine labour standards or the labour‐related rights and principles contained in the Parties’s respective laws.


2. The principles in paragraph 1 shall guide the Parties as they implement the Agreement, including regular consideration by the Joint Committee, pursuant to Article 18, of the social effects of the Agreement and the development of appropriate responses to concerns found to be legitimate.




DOT “Public Interest” Statute
Title 49 – TRANSPORTATION
SUBTITLE VII - AVIATION PROGRAMS
PART A - AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY
subpart ii - economic regulation
CHAPTER 413 - FOREIGN AIR TRANSPORTATION
§41302. Permits of foreign air carriers
The Secretary of Transportation may issue a permit to a person (except a citizen of the United States) authorizing the person to provide foreign air transportation as a foreign air carrier if the Secretary finds that—
(1) the person is fit, willing, and able to provide the foreign air transportation to be authorized by the permit and to comply with this part and regulations of the Secretary; and
(2)(A) the person is qualified, and has been designated by the government of its country, to provide the foreign air transportation under an agreement with the United States Government; or
(B) the foreign air transportation to be provided under the permit will be in the public interest.
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1126.)


§40101. Policy
(a) Economic Regulation.—In carrying out subpart II of this part and those provisions of subpart IV applicable in carrying out subpart II, the Secretary of Transportation shall consider the following matters, among others, as being in the public interest and consistent with public convenience and necessity:
(1) assigning and maintaining safety as the highest priority in air commerce.
(2) before authorizing new air transportation services, evaluating the safety implications of those services.
(3) preventing deterioration in established safety procedures, recognizing the clear intent, encouragement, and dedication of Congress to further the highest degree of safety in air transportation and air commerce, and to maintain the safety vigilance that has evolved in air transportation and air commerce and has come to be expected by the traveling and shipping public.
(4) the availability of a variety of adequate, economic, efficient, and low-priced services without unreasonable discrimination or unfair or deceptive practices.
(5) coordinating transportation by, and improving relations among, air carriers, and encouraging fair wages and working conditions.
(6) placing maximum reliance on competitive market forces and on actual and potential competition—
(A) to provide the needed air transportation system; and
(B) to encourage efficient and well-managed air carriers to earn adequate profits and attract capital, considering any material differences between interstate air transportation and foreign air transportation.
(7) developing and maintaining a sound regulatory system that is responsive to the needs of the public and in which decisions are reached promptly to make it easier to adapt the air transportation system to the present and future needs of—
(A) the commerce of the United States;
(B) the United States Postal Service; and
(C) the national defense.
(8) encouraging air transportation at major urban areas through secondary or satellite airports if consistent with regional airport plans of regional and local authorities, and if endorsed by appropriate State authorities—
(A) encouraging the transportation by air carriers that provide, in a specific market, transportation exclusively at those airports; and
(B) fostering an environment that allows those carriers to establish themselves and develop secondary or satellite airport services.
(9) preventing unfair, deceptive, predatory, or anticompetitive practices in air transportation.
(10) avoiding unreasonable industry concentration, excessive market domination, monopoly powers, and other conditions that would tend to allow at least one air carrier or foreign air carrier unreasonably to increase prices, reduce services, or exclude competition in air transportation.
(11) maintaining a complete and convenient system of continuous scheduled interstate air transportation for small communities and isolated areas with direct financial assistance from the United States Government when appropriate.
(12) encouraging, developing, and maintaining an air transportation system relying on actual and potential competition—
(A) to provide efficiency, innovation, and low prices; and
(B) to decide on the variety and quality of, and determine prices for, air transportation services.
(13) encouraging entry into air transportation markets by new and existing air carriers and the continued strengthening of small air carriers to ensure a more effective and competitive airline industry.
(14) promoting, encouraging, and developing civil aeronautics and a viable, privately-owned United States air transport industry.
(15) strengthening the competitive position of air carriers to at least ensure equality with foreign air carriers, including the attainment of the opportunity for air carriers to maintain and increase their profitability in foreign air transportation.
(16) ensuring that consumers in all regions of the United States, including those in small communities and rural and remote areas, have access to affordable, regularly scheduled air service.
 
Deeeeeennnnnied!!

The Department of Transportation has denied Norwegian Air International’s procedural application to operate in the United States. The Teamsters, along with many other labor and industry groups, called on the DOT to deny a temporary waiver allowing NAI to begin transatlantic service in the U.S. and our voices were heard.


According to the DOT: “Because of the extensive record, which reflects the novel and complex nature of this case…the Department does not find that a temporary exemption is appropriate or in the public interest.”


For now though, NAI – dubbed the “Walmart of the Skies” – won’t be operating in the U.S. This is a partial victory, however. Several large cargo and express carriers - Atlas Air among them - have supported NAI’s application, while the Teamsters and Local 1224 were opposed. Industry insiders say a full application for NAI to operate in the U.S. is still pending and is not likely to be ruled on until after the November elections.
The Department of Transportation has denied Norwegian Air International’s procedural application to operate in the United States. The Teamsters, along with many other labor and industry groups, called on the DOT to deny a temporary waiver allowing NAI to begin transatlantic service in the U.S. and our voices were heard.


According to the DOT: “Because of the extensive record, which reflects the novel and complex nature of this case…the Department does not find that a temporary exemption is appropriate or in the public interest.”


For now though, NAI – dubbed the “Walmart of the Skies” – won’t be operating in the U.S. This is a partial victory, however. Several large cargo and express carriers - Atlas Air among them - have supported NAI’s application, while the Teamsters and Local 1224 were opposed. Industry insiders say a full application for NAI to operate in the U.S. is still pending and is not likely to be ruled on until after the November elections. So we will remain vigilant and will actively fight any airline that pursues the "flag of convenience" model that would undermine the safety of the airline industry, let alone the security of its workers.


The airline’s race to the bottom in search of cheap labor and lax regulatory regimes will undermine the good middle class jobs in our nation’s airline industry, unless we stop them. Let’s keep up the fight!
 
I don't think it's possible to be alarmist about this issue. We lose this one, might as well just get it over with and go to work at Home Depot. It's a good start.
 
Maritime boom: More hands needed on deck
By Mary Thompson 2 hours ago
0 shares
Content preferences
Done

.
View photo
Karina Frayter | CNBC
On a typical sunny Southern California day, a bright red tugboat cuts through the channel in the Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach. On the banks, containers filled with cargo are stacked high. Massive cranes dip in to pull them out one at a time and load them onto waiting vessels.

After a steep drop in activity that followed the Great Recession, the maritime industry is growing again. In 2012, global seaborne trade reached 9 billion metric tons for the first time ever, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. The growth in trade is translating into growth in jobs.
"Our plan is to hire 500 to 600 maritime workers over the next five years," said Thomas Crowley, CEO of Crowley Maritime.

The family-owned company based in Jacksonville, Florida, will find it has some competition when it looks to build its 5,000 person workforce. A 2010 report from the International Maritime Organization forecast the industry could be short 27,000 to 46,000 officers to man the world's tankers, cargo and container ships and tugboats over the next few years.

One of the key reasons for the labor shortage-the energy boom.

"When the oil industry is doing well, you end up with shortages in the maritime industry," said Bart Rogers, assistant vice president at the Paul Hall Center for Maritime Training, a school run by the Seafarers International Union.

Along with the added demand for ships to move higher volumes of crude oil and natural gas over water, the maritime industry faces the challenge of managing an aging workforce. Increasingly, the world's vessels are commanded by officers nearing retirement age, and replacing them has become more difficult. New regulations mandated by the 2010 Manila Convention mean all hands on deck, or below, need added training and more days at sea. This means it takes longer to move up a ship's ladder from a deckhand to the skilled positions of third, second and first mate, chief engineer and captain.

"You can't just go and work on a ship or a boat anymore," Rogers said. "You have to be qualified and you have to be trained."

To make sure it is getting the workers it needs, Crowley works closely with the nation's six maritime academies, which produce officers, and the maritime unions, which recruit and then train prospective hires who start at a lower level but can work their way up.

"They are our partners," Crowley said of the unions. "They provide training, work on regulations in a number of different parts of the industry. It's an important part of how we operate."

Among the students at the Paul Hall Center in Piney Point, Maryland, is 30-year-old Martin McDonald. A divorced father of two and Iraq war veteran, he settled on a maritime career because he liked the lifestyle it afforded his friends who were in it.

"They have lucrative time off. They have nice houses," he said. "They live without want, essentially, when they are off ship. They travel to all sorts of places in both their careers and leisure time."
Steve Peckham, a 20-year veteran of the maritime industry and captain of Crowley's L.A.-based tugboat Scout, puts it another way. "I work two weeks on, two weeks off," said Peckham, who lives in Rhode Island and flies to Los Angeles to work. "It's kind of like I go on vacation every month."

Getting to sit in the captain's chair takes time though. McDonald is just getting qualified to work on a vessel, meaning he is being trained in first aid, rescue and survival, firefighting and the basics of operating a ship. It's a three-month program. The former Marine will then need to log 1,080 days on a vessel before he can apply for licensing programs that would move him into the officers ranks.
"I want to have my own ship by 50," he said. "That is my goal."

If he reaches that goal, McDonald will be pulling down a six-figure salary. In general, working in the maritime industry pays well. An entry level, able bodied seaman, a classification McDonald hopes to obtain in the next 18 months, can earn $40,000 to $50,000 a year. A fully trained engineer or mate, a mid-tiered position, can earn $70,000 to $90,000.

"These are very high-paying jobs," said Crowley, who added even though the looming labor shortage has not yet hit the company's bottom line, the firm might have to pay higher wages and signing bonuses whenever there is a shortage.

Rogers notes the shortage is not acute right now, but it is something the union, and the industry, are keeping a very close eye on.

"A lot of the shortage exists in the inland field," said Rogers, referring to vessels that sail on lakes and rivers. "We maintain our pool at two people for every job all the time. What you would like to have is 2½ people for every job."

-By CNBC's Mary Thompson


Well, I guess there goes that argument. ;)
 
Well, I guess there goes that argument. ;)

That article seemed to be referring to domestic tug operations only. All it suggests to me is that American seamen (tee hee) should be very thankful that their union is strong enough to prevent cabotage.
 
I like how the issues is so damn important and ALPA wants pilots to vote they then lock the issue away behind a secure portal. Apparently they only want ALPA pilots encouraging votes. You think they would want all pilots informed on this.

any time money is given to congressmen/women it is to try and influence a vote, no matter how one tries to categorized the money. IMO congress members shouldn't be allowed to accept anything outside of the salary & benefits allotted to them by the tax payers. Our congress is for sale and has been for awhile.
 
Back
Top