Could someone with only a PPL have a chance of taking - and passing - the ATP written by only using Sheppard?
Interesting. I haven't read the whole rule. I just know there are examiners saying they can't take it. And since the rule changed things for an ATP cert, but the exemption says 121, places like Cape Air may not be exempt.Apparently still valid, though using an expired written will close from June.
http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/faa-grants-exemption-for-expired-atp-writtens.145351/
Sweet genius, why would you do that that to yourself? Sheppard Air was the only thing that kept me from stabbing my eyes out studying for that written.*Takes the lesser-spotted ATP 135 Written, waits...*
Depends on the job. Multi-engine IFR 135 with pax requires an ATP.
I don't think so. It is 135.243(a)(1) for those interested.Is that a recent rule change?
Is that a recent rule change?
It's commonly overlooked, but ANY 135 scheduled commuter service in a twin (regardless of IFR or VFR) requires an ATP.I don't think so. It is 135.243(a)(1) for those interested.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
If the rule changes on August 1 2014, then will having your written done before then exempt you from the additional training required?
I don't see where this additional training has anything to do with the written.
Can someone link it please
Edit
Found it
Agreed!I wish the FAA would focus more on pilot fatigue rather than more ATP requirments, requiring regional pilots to have a ATP greatly reduces pilot inexperience mistakes, which is good but they really need to look at pilot fatigue and its negative impacts and how they can improve it.