New Cessna 150 Owner

Usually tach time is used for aircraft and Hobbs time is for pilots. This is based on FAR definitions, by the way. However, at the 135 I worked at we used a Hobbs meters driven activated by air pressure to track aircraft time. So there are different ways to do it.
Ok, cool - I just wanted to make sure I hadn't bought an 8K hour airplane that actually has 10K hours on it.
 
Ok, cool - I just wanted to make sure I hadn't bought an 8K hour airplane that actually has 10K hours on it.

Still possible, but on a C150 - that isn't much of a difference in value/ maintenance items as there are very few, if any, life limited components on the venerable Cessna Commuter. You'd have to audit the logbooks to verify the tach - hobbs - TTAF. TTE are consistent.
 
The newly overhauled prop ... $2,200 for the overhaul and another 3.2 in labor for my A&P to put it on:

1759521352801.jpeg
 
3.2 is a little steep. It should be about 1 for R&R, unless there was other work happening.
It might depend on where the work was completed. Did @Murdoughnut bring the airplane to the mechanic or did the mechanic travel to the airplane? I'm not saying someone isn't overcharging for labor hours but even if the mechanic is based at the same airport they'll have to pack up their tools as if they were going on a road trip to a ramp parking spot a 1/4 mile away. If it was me doing the work I'd want to run the airplane up afterwards to make sure everything felt okay before I signed it off. I wouldn't insist on a test flight, I've changed engines on plenty of aircraft and the only test flights I ever went on were because of the operators GMM, most of the time you just take them to the blast fence and put them through a regiment of tests, make a couple adjustments (and if necessary fix any leaks) and then sign it off. With no other context other than a prop log entry and an airframe log entry it's hard to figure out why it took 3.2 hours, this is why a detailed W/O is important, it answers questions. The physical work of removing and reinstalling the spinner and the prop seems feasible in an hour IF EVERYTHING GOES PERFECTLY, one stripped screw on the spinner or any other number of things will throw that number way off. Then whoever did the work has to figure out and try to verify the hours (and cycles, but probably not on a 152) and either write or print up an airframe logbook entry (the prop shop should've already done their log book entry) and it all takes time. I don't think 3.2 hours of labor to remove and install the propeller on an airplane is exorbitant. If I owned a 152 I can guarantee you it would take longer for me to do it myself.
 
The newly overhauled prop ... $2,200 for the overhaul and another 3.2 in labor for my A&P to put it on:

View attachment 85829
That's a nice looking 152. I know they're a pain in the ass but I hope you keep the wheel pants, the performance or efficiency advantages are probably negligible but just based on this picture your airplane is the hot chick on that ramp.
 
I'll ask him - I know he does dynamic balancing, but he didn't mention it to me. Log entry just says installed per manufacturer guidelines.
Did he change the alternator belt? It's one of those "as long as I'm here I might as well do this cheap thing as well" deals. I'm sensitive to that particular issue because of an issue I had that I described in another thread. I wanted to just change the alternator belt and continue south, it became quickly obvious to me that replacing the belt would require removing the propeller and although I was absolutely capable and I'd made some friends willing to loan me tools I decided to just leave that rental airplane at Paso Robles with the remnants of the alternator belt in the pilots seat, had I owned that airplane I'd of probably dug in and fixed it and ended up back home a day later.
 
I'll ask him - I know he does dynamic balancing, but he didn't mention it to me. Log entry just says installed per manufacturer guidelines.

There would be a note of the IPS that was measured. Or, another dead giveaway would be the small screws in the flywheel used as weight to do the balance. Biggest giveaway, it takes time, and you would have gotten an invoice for that.
 
There would be a note of the IPS that was measured. Or, another dead giveaway would be the small screws in the flywheel used as weight to do the balance. Biggest giveaway, it takes time, and you would have gotten an invoice for that.
I used to work in a prop shop that overhauled big props, think C-130 and P-3 size props and they were all static balanced and I don't recall any complaints. When I graduated up to helicopters I learned about IPS, we'd mount those sensors all over the place to try to figure out why they were trying to shake themselves apart, there's a dongle underneath the cockpit floor of an Astar or TwinStar with a a tunable lead weight, you can move the weight fractions of an inch trying to chase weird harmonic vibrations. I recall back in the very old days there was a helicopter guru named Dave Dunstan that worked for Aerospatiale and we were friendly so I called him when we were chasing a vibration issue on one of our AS355s and he asked about how or who had worked on the aircraft and I told him the windscreens had been replaced. He just chuckled and said go retorque all of the windscreen fasteners. I dutifully went out and found the majority loose, tightened them per the AMM and that helicopter was perfect after that. And then I went on to work on turbofan engines and the IPS thing got even more important, but that's a story for another day.
 
Back
Top