I'm aware. I'd log Far 1 if I flew army airplanes.
As a CFI, that's true. When you get into scheduled operations with flight and duty limits, it's not. The feds are quite picky about making sure that you and the carrier follow the rules.
Nice to not have to deal with that stuff anymore, huh?![]()
I have never ever heard that the FAA would "track" my hobbs time as "duty" time. Never. Doesn't happen.
If I log take off to landing time as right time, that is my flight time, as an instructor, or pilot.
The FAA will not tell you taxi time is flight time.
They allow the logging of taxi time as flight time because it isn't worth the effort to argue the point- as I have come to know. But they do not track an instructor's hobbs time as opposed to actual flight time. They accept it however you log it.
The reality is the opposite. As shown by the recent opinion Blackhawk pointed to (which cites more than 30 years of backdrop), the FAA cares very much about duty time limitations and the inclusion of taxi time as "actual flight time." It's with respect to instructors not otherwise employed in the system and our duty time limitations, the FAA accepts whatever you put in because it's usually not worth the effort to argue the point.I have never ever heard that the FAA would "track" my hobbs time as "duty" time. Never. Doesn't happen.
If I log take off to landing time as right time, that is my flight time, as an instructor, or pilot.
The FAA will not tell you taxi time is flight time.
They allow the logging of taxi time as flight time because it isn't worth the effort to argue the point- as I have come to know. But they do not track an instructor's hobbs time as opposed to actual flight time. They accept it however you log it.
I'm aware. I'd log Far 1 if I flew army airplanes.
Oh, also remember that FAR 1 does not apply only to airplanes, but to "aircraft". In the eyes of the FAA a pilot may begin logging flight time when they start to ground taxi in a helicopter. Does this make sense? Well, after having a Saudi student try to roll a UH-60 on me while ground taxiing I would argue yes, it is flight time. In the eyes of the Army I was not yet logging IP time, but I was sure acting as an IP.
How does one manage to nearly roll a UH-60 over while ground taxiing? Impressive!
I saw everything I needed to understand when he said "Saudi student."
How does one manage to nearly roll a UH-60 over while ground taxiing? Impressive!
Yes it was. Lesson learned- never, ever let your guard down with a student. Especially a Saudi student.
It rolled enough to lift a tire and start the dynamic roll over process before I intervened. Would have been an interesting accident report... "IP failed to intervene in time."
Allah would've intervened in time![]()
Completely different subject area. Flight time is inclusive in the "duty time" limitations set in 135/121 operations. There ate no such duty time limits in 91 ops, which is what flight instruction.is.As a CFI, that's true. When you get into scheduled operations with flight and duty limits, it's not. The feds are quite picky about making sure that you and the carrier follow the rules.