The way I read that was an attempt to explain in layperson’s terms what a transponder is.A vehicle would only need an old 4096 mode A transponder for the asde to work. No need to buy something(edit: new), there has to be a ton of those that were scrapped or on shelves collecting dust now. I brought this up when the ads-b mandate happened, but I am nobody.
From the article I posted above:
View attachment 88977
If you are correct, it is possible the lead vehicle (truck 1) did stop, and this truck (32) didn't get the message. It is not unusual for some vehicles in a convoy to not have an aviation radio onboard, but I would think ALL ARFF vehicles would have them. This article is the only source I saw mention the lack of radios. I did retrieve it at the time of this post and it is unchanged from last night when I linked it originally.
I took the “radio receiver and transmitter” as a layman’s explanation of what a transponder is rather than saying they didn’t have radio on board to talk to others.A vehicle would only need an old 4096 mode A transponder for the asde to work. No need to buy something(edit: new), there has to be a ton of those that were scrapped or on shelves collecting dust now. I brought this up when the ads-b mandate happened, but I am nobody.
From the article I posted above:
View attachment 88977
If you are correct, it is possible the lead vehicle (truck 1) did stop, and this truck (32) didn't get the message. It is not unusual for some vehicles in a convoy to not have an aviation radio onboard, but I would think ALL ARFF vehicles would have them. This article is the only source I saw mention the lack of radios. I did retrieve it at the time of this post and it is unchanged from last night when I linked it originally.
They're spending money on lawsuits and environmental studies. Everyone that is against the HSR is actively fighting using laws to force more and more environmental review. Even though CAHSR ends up winning these, they still have to spend a lot of money on lawyers and stop progress in the meantime for whatever reason. It's absolutely asinine.CA is doing it! You'll be able to get from LA to SF in under three hours! The US is finally going to get a real bullet train! The rest of the states will surely follow this example of bureaucratic efficiency...
Wait a second, I just read the project is massively over budget and behind schedule. Not a single section of rail has been placed, no stations have been built and now it's going to run between Merced and Bakersfield (a very popular corridor for commuters). Billions of dollars have gone into this project over 2 1/2 decades and there's nothing to show for it, the Feds have decided to stop funding this entire debacle. There's no accounting where the all of the state tax or federal tax money went but they've spent $13.8 billion so far. CA has about 10% of the US population, now that fraud has become a big talking point the floodgates of info about what's going on in that state shouldn't be surprising. I love CA and I'd go back, but not until after they hit rock bottom and are recovering. That's what a democrat super majority leads to, all ideas and good vibes, zero pragmatism and actual work.
So there’s a lot to this question which is fair. LGA had a pretty big transition where when we use to land we called ramp for our spot entry. Then idk maybe 6 months ago or more that was no longer required - even notam’d by company to NOT do it anymore. Ground will assign your spot when you land.Curiously, how much would LGA tower have been involved with trying to help UAL get a gate? Wouldn’t the UAL jet be talking to ramp tower for coordination of all of that? Then let ground know what solution has been made? Assuming the UAL jet wasn’t sitting on or blocking a taxiway or other movement area, but still, would LGA ground controller be involved with any coordination of that? It seems outside their scope of responsibility, if I’m understanding it right?