Not in the least. I find it laughable.U mad bro?
So they’ll just add it to the net loss?I’d just like to point out that fine to revenue is a bad model. Try fine against profits, that’s a more realistic understanding of the impact the fine will have.
It is, but I agree that negligent planning is evil. Same with airports allowing airlines to start flights that don't fit knowing hundreds per day may misconnect due to the domino effect of that crap.I’ve flown on them. It’s a great product. Carry on.
I wouldn’t wanna get stuck in FresNOIt is, but I agree that negligent planning is evil. Same with airports allowing airlines to start flights that don't fit knowing hundreds per day may misconnect due to the domino effect of that crap.
Not so quick. They're loosing money. Fine may hurt.Fine $2,000,000
Revenue $9,600,000,000
Percentage of fine to revenue 0.02%
That’ll show ‘em! I’m sure there is a board meeting going on right now to ensure this never happens again.
Sounds like they need to tighten their purse strings.Not so quick. They're loosing money. Fine may hurt.
You beat me to it.Better tighten that money up.
I’m sure the government will be along shortly.Better tighten that money up.
Big case, big headline, surprisingly easy work to prove. What young, ambitious, DOJ attorney could miss such a ripe target?Did JetBlue pee in the DOJs Cheerios?
That’s what I’m wondering. I’ve always given JetBlue grace when it comes to on time performance. When your operation is predominantly in one of the most saturated areas in relation to airspace it’s a wonder they don’t cancel more. During my 9E days other then being a commuter there was a reason I bid mostly AM flying in NYC. After 3pm it usually hit the fan.Did JetBlue pee in the DOJs Cheerios?
We have entire regulations because of that airline.It is, but I agree that negligent planning is evil.
We have entire regulations because of that airline.