Endeavor ALPA to publish delinquent dues'rs

It's not bullying to try to get someone to pay for what they get. When you work at a union airline, you get the benefit of collective bargaining, contract enforcement, job protection, etc. You need to pay for what you get. If you call bill collection bullying, then I would respectfully suggest that you're a bit too sensitive.
 
It's not bullying to try to get someone to pay for what they get. When you work at a union airline, you get the benefit of collective bargaining, contract enforcement, job protection, etc. You need to pay for what you get. If you call bill collection bullying, then I would respectfully suggest that you're a bit too sensitive.

Ha. That's not what I'm talking about. That's the most unfavorable way possible to interpret what I've said thus far. There have been two discussions here. One being the billing discussion, the other feelings on unions in general.
 
Ok. But we disagree on all of it anyway. :) I'm an old school trade unionist, so I see no problem with peer pressure and the like being used to get members of the craft and class to support their union. No violence or property damage of any sort, but peer pressure is fair game.
 
Ok. But we disagree on all of it anyway. :) I'm an old school trade unionist, so I see no problem with peer pressure and the like being used to get members of the craft and class to support their union. No violence or property damage of any sort, but peer pressure is fair game.

That pressure has the exact opposite reaction on me. It makes me want to say "Eff off", and do the opposite of whatever it is I'm being pressured to do.

A perfect example:

The BlueTruth guys are essentially ordering us to not go to any of the company meet and greets. They are using the standard manipulation techniques. I say they have NO right to tell me what meetings to go to, or to tell me to not listen to both sides of the argument. They are no better than the company in terms of manipulating the intake of information to craft their message.
 
Where I work it doesn't take long for one to see it's union vs company and supporting the union (blindly, even) is your best bet. It usually takes about six months for a guy to figure out that supporting the union 100% is in his best interests. Yeah, they aren't perfect, but imagine where we would be without them...
 
Obviously it isn't exactly the same (busted kneecaps vs. bullying), but it is the same mentality. I really have a tough time with the bullying that goes on with respect to unions. For a significant number of union supporters, if you disagree with them, you deserve to be ostracized, names put on lists, etc. etc. That's BS. Even in this very thread ATN_pilot said that my name belongs on the "non-member" list. That is a non-so-subtle way of saying that since I don't toe the party line, I deserve to be treated differently.

To answer the guy from way back, that's the anti-intellectual part. If you think for yourself, and that thought is in any way different from the party line, you are considered an outsider. That disincentivises any unique or outside the box thinking. Unions do not value diversity of thought within their ranks. They value homogeneity. Everyone is in agreement, all nodding together.

Well there's a mob mentality, and that is human. I think Seggy and his boys did their best not to intimidate during the first (failed) union drive but even I felt one guy laid it on a little thick. I made my decision based on another pilot I looked to for guidance (an old cop turned pilot) who was absolutely sold on a union. If I didn't have that sort of guidance I could see myself feeling like I was pushed a little, but I don't think anyone imagines me as a guy who won't speak up about it. If you don't like something speak up about it to them. Ask Seggy to be sure, but I think during our first drive we had to rein in a guy who was a little too persuasive. I may be remembering that wrong though. I thought it was a Saab guy, but we may have just been making fun of Saab guys that day.

Every union is going to be a little different, and every ALPA local/airline is going to have a little different culture. The Delta union right now is valuing the hell out of the supposed DPA reps, bringing them into leadership positions and trying to help understand what they want changed, and this is after the Delta contract that supposedly was the last nail in the coffin for DPA. So not every union values homogeneity. You want to see a couple knuckle dragging good old boys, let me take you to CT at the Pratt and Whitney plant and I'll see how long it takes you to screw up enough for every plant worker to throw down their wrench. Know what? They take a hell of a lot of pride in what they do, and they make more than you, and they turn wrenches. Homogeneity can be good too.

Mesaba's guys were always about hard work, and unless you were butting heads with the MEC at the time (Nagel) you could voice your opinion and at least get an educated explanation on why something gets done the way it is done. Nagel was the best guy to have in your corner, but he was abrasive as hell and I couldn't take him for more than a few minutes at a time. Now that we are Endeavor we have a mix of a lot of guys, a lot of our best and brightest have left, and some of the guys are here to manufacture chaos, promise and convince guys they will solve it all for them, take as many paid days off as they can, not do any work, let everyone down, and blame someone else. Well if they do work there is no evidence of it. It's painful to watch. That's my union now though, and even though we've come down a long way, it's still better than non union Colgan. When you have a lot of dedicated hard workers with good moral, things fire on all cylinders and life is good. I'm sure it could be a lot worse here, especially if I started helping, but it's a hell of a lot more than nothing.

That pressure has the exact opposite reaction on me. It makes me want to say "Eff off", and do the opposite of whatever it is I'm being pressured to do.

A perfect example:

The BlueTruth guys are essentially ordering us to not go to any of the company meet and greets. They are using the standard manipulation techniques. I say they have NO right to tell me what meetings to go to, or to tell me to not listen to both sides of the argument. They are no better than the company in terms of manipulating the intake of information to craft their message.

Eh, for the majority of humans, peer pressure and herd dynamics are better drivers than anything else. If you get bored sometimes and want proof there's a million examples on Freakonomics books and podcasts. I think you can even see an article on how Westchester NY is using peer pressure to get citizens to pay their property taxes on time in full. It works. Maybe you're one of the small percentage who don't respond well to any pressure, but we don't shoot for a 100%.

I don't know why I'm replying this much to the topic. If you've got a problem with a fee and they can't explain it to you don't pay. If they have explained it to you and you agree, then pay. If you don't agree with the charges then get a lawyer. Seems like this should be a shorter thread.

If the union does that to enough people, you'll find yourself in a regime change sir.

Not if I have a hand in it.

(I just reread a lot of that and I barely understood it because of all the run on sentences. I won't feel bad if you skip and don't read any of it.)
 
Count me in the same group as PP then. I don't really see it as "peer pressure." Peer pressure would be "67% of your fellow pilots want a union. Don't you think they might be in the right?" What we're talking are issues like "vote for this or they're gonna liquidate" or "Your stupid if you don't think a union is better." If you're using negotiating tactics on your own membership, something isn't right somewhere. Save that crap for management. I can't tell you how many pro-union conversations I've seen totally de-railed in the crew room because the pro union guy got emotional and started talking down to the very people he was trying to convince to join his cause. I'm in the camp of if you make valid points, I'm with your.....right up the point you insult my integrity and my intelligence. Then, assuming it doesn't affect me much personally, I'm just as likely to torpedo because you're an •.

As for "bill collecting as bullying," no, it's not bullying. However, blindly paying up isn't a desired outcome either. Calling people names in order to get them to pay. THAT'S bullying. An yeah, I know you're not ALPA, Todd. But (and this ties into the PR issue in the other thread), you've associated yourself so closely with them for so long and so hard that you might as well be seen as an ALPA spokesperson. Weren't you (maybe still are, hell I don't know) an EVP? That seems pretty ALPA to me. And isn't the whole union thing "You are ALPA?" If I went and insulted a jetBlue customer who had a jetBlue complaint and knew I was an employee of jetBlue, how do you think they would take it? The thing a LOT of people seem to forget (or conveniently ignore in some cases) is that even if you're not acting in the capacity of a representative at the time, you're still a representative by association.
 
A union that doesn't tell you the truth about the company's financial situation is not a union that you should want. That's not "using negotiating tactics on your own membership," it's responsible leadership. They aren't there to make you feel better, they're there to help make sure that your career is taken care of.

As far as PR, you can consider me a "spokesman" all you want. I'm not, at least not here, unless I specifically say that I'm acting in that capacity. But if you want to perceive it that way, then go right ahead.
 
A union that doesn't tell you the truth about the company's financial situation is not a union that you should want. That's not "using negotiating tactics on your own membership," it's responsible leadership. They aren't there to make you feel better, they're there to help make sure that your career is taken care of.

And a union that picks and chooses facts to further entrench its position is no different than the management it fights against. I prefer healthy skepticism on all fronts to blind following. Unfortunately, I see a LOT of "Well, ALPA said X, so it's fact." If ya want, I can go back to some of the OC's e-mails recently where they do an excellent job of leading down a certain path, but when you ask a couple of questions, it kills the whole argument. How is that any different than when management does the same? What a union should do is present facts and let the membership decide which is best for them. Present the facts as they stand to the pilots, let the pilots decide.

Many times they can't tell me what's best for me because they don't know my unique situations. Hell, our reps at Pinnacle were so out of touch with the line pilots they forgot they even repped JFK as well as DTW half the time. We'd get e-mails saying they were in the "crew room" at some point. When I'd ask "Which crew room," I'd be met at first with confusion and then a slow realization. God forbid you actually needed someone there to act as a union rep in a meeting. If you were lucky, you'd get someone on the phone who might know 10% of your situation and what happened.
 
The OC is not ALPA. Hell, until a week ago, ALPA wasn't even involved in your drive. It wasn't until the OC had a huge stack of cards that ALPA was ready to get involved.

As far as skepticism of your own union, I find that ridiculous. Your union is you. It's your fellow pilots. They have the same interests that you do, unlike management. To put them on equal footing when it comes to trust is just plain nuts.
 
As far as skepticism of your own union, I find that ridiculous. Your union is you. It's your fellow pilots. They have the same interests that you do, unlike management. To put them on equal footing when it comes to trust is just plain nuts.

It doesn't sound like what the fellow pilots stand for is the problem, but rather how certain members in leadership roles go about it. Unity is not talking down to people or dismissing their questions/concerns (going by his descriptions), that won't garner support for a stand or cause. Alienating people isn't the way to win them over to a common cause. That's supposed to be management's tactic; the fellow members of the union and its elected leadership shouldn't resort to the same tactics, because then they become no different in making the line pilot/member feel like nothing more than a pawn.

And this isn't just unions/management, it can be applied to any number of life situations.
 
The OC is not ALPA. Hell, until a week ago, ALPA wasn't even involved in your drive. It wasn't until the OC had a huge stack of cards that ALPA was ready to get involved.

As far as skepticism of your own union, I find that ridiculous. Your union is you. It's your fellow pilots. They have the same interests that you do, unlike management. To put them on equal footing when it comes to trust is just plain nuts.

Wait. So they OC isn't ALPA. This is where I was going with the PR thing. The OC are the ones that are trying to convince people on ALPA's behalf. Are they ALPA technically? No. Are they in the realm of public opinion? You bet.

You mean to tell me ALL of the pilots here at jetBlue want to be based in MCO, don't care what equipment they're on and don't really care that much about their 401k? That's laughable. A lot of our guys are on Tri Care since they're ex-military. They don't care what I do about medical insurance. They're covered. However, they're closer to retirement. They'd rather sell my insurance down the river for a better 401k match. A lot live in the Northeast and couldn't care less if MCO closed tomorrow. In fact, they'd prefer it as their relative seniority would go up. As I said, EACH pilot's situation is different. To assume we all want the same things is folly. Many of my fellow pilots DON'T have the same interests I do. However, ALPA will do a great job trying to convince me I should fall in step with the majority. So, yeah. I DO put the union on equal footing as far as trust goes. I was a blind follower once. Got kicked in the teeth too many times, so now I don't trust them anymore.
 
It doesn't sound like what the fellow pilots stand for is the problem, but rather how certain members in leadership roles go about it. Unity is not talking down to people or dismissing their questions/concerns (going by his descriptions), that won't garner support for a stand or cause. Alienating people isn't the way to win them over to a common cause. That's supposed to be management's tactic; the fellow members of the union and its elected leadership shouldn't resort to the same tactics, because then they become no different in making the line pilot/member feel like nothing more than a pawn.

And this isn't just unions/management, it can be applied to any number of life situations.

I could copy plenty of posts on BluePilots.com where people who say they are yes votes are still derided because they don't agree 100% with the original post. It gets pretty nasty on there. It's not a good way to convince people.
 
@kellwolf I'm trying hard to understand your angst. You think that the union should fight for all of your individual problems or wants? That would be great in a perfect world but you have been around long enough to know that isn't going to happen. Hell, I'm single and the healthcare we get is ok (for short haul standards) but it sucks for people with families. We put a lot of effort in getting that taken care of. I guess now that I think about it I'm pissed because that could have made my section 3 a bit bigger but I understand that it is helping a majority of our guys. I guess I'm more of a, "it takes a village" kind of guy when it comes to labor relations/bargaining.

Besides your anger with certain people and their method of pressure what's the true beef? I remember when you did a lot of volunteering when you were at PCL.
 
@kellwolf I'm trying hard to understand your angst. You think that the union should fight for all of your individual problems or wants?

Not at all. That's impossible. Put all the facts on the table (good and bad) and let the membership vote. Majority rules. My main issue was the idea that all pilots have the same goals. It's simply not true. As you said, in a perfect world, that would be the case. But it's far from that.

Besides your anger with certain people and their method of pressure what's the true beef? I remember when you did a lot of volunteering when you were at PCL.

My main beef is how a lot of people (and I'm talking beyond Todd and Seggy here, I'm talking about people at my current carrier) have ALPA up on a pedestal. I've seen too much of the bad side of ALPA for me to believe that. Maybe I volunteered too much or for too long, and the "union" at Pinnacle was far from even being able to remotely call themselves unified, even after the combined MEC took over. In fact, I wanna toss out an apology to @jynxyjoe since (at least according to Seggy) I at one point told him to get over it and move on. Sounds like something I would have said at the time, and there were so many fighting factions that it was crazy. Mesaba guys were fighting for control, Pinnacle guys were fighting to hold on to what they had and Colgan guys were just happy to not be furloughed as they watched their bases and planes go away. The Bloch decision was a HUGE pill for a lot of the Pinnacle guys to swallow. It's apparently (from what I hear) still bad. Although if Colgan guys are allowed to bid over to the -900 now, it might even be worse for some of the Mesaba guys. There's a prime example of one union that represents multiple pilots with different interests. They guy that lived in IAH probably didn't care that JFK was growing. He only cared he was getting booted out and would have to commute now. Same guys for the guys in MEM and ATL. Now, I realize a lot of that ALPA couldn't do much about, but trying to tell people it was better than it was cheapens them and makes it disingenuous. Just pull the band-aid off and tell it like it is. And for gods' sake don't just blame anything bad on management.

Here, the big line is "scope will save you in an integration." Well, no. It won't. I've lived that past under ALPA before, and they (the OC, which I guess isn't ALPA now?) are selling that to the pilots here. McBond won't save you, but ultimately, your contract might not either. Wanna make sure you get an okay seniority list integration along with an operational merger? Be friends with the arbitrator. Sure, ALPA will tell you "The scope is iron clad. We got this." But that's no more or less true than management saying "McBond is all you need." So, as I said, healthy skepticism on both. I don't trust either because I've been bitten by both in the past.
 
It doesn't sound like what the fellow pilots stand for is the problem, but rather how certain members in leadership roles go about it. Unity is not talking down to people or dismissing their questions/concerns (going by his descriptions), that won't garner support for a stand or cause. Alienating people isn't the way to win them over to a common cause. That's supposed to be management's tactic; the fellow members of the union and its elected leadership shouldn't resort to the same tactics, because then they become no different in making the line pilot/member feel like nothing more than a pawn.

And this isn't just unions/management, it can be applied to any number of life situations.

Mike, people like kellwolf expect the union to do nothing more than throw the contract out there and tell them to vote however they want. That's not leadership, and I'd be sickened to be involved with any organization like that. We had pilots at AirTran who stood in a room full of pilots and screamed that they would vote against any contract that had less than $180k in retro pay for them. You bet your damned ass that we told him he was out of his mind, and we explained exactly why he was out of his mind. And you know what? That one pilot may have been perturbed that he wasn't made to feel like the most special guy in the world, but 90% of the pilots got the message and voted in favor of a contract that gave them hundreds of millions of dollars in improvements.

I'm not worried about satisfying the kellwolfs of the world who get offended at leadership. I'm worried about doing what's right for the pilots.
 
Back
Top