And that's based on 1980's number crunchers who have GenX's mentality of going to college, specializing in Lockheed's Management program and working at Lockheed for the next 40 years.
It just doesn't happen any more.
It's kinda' like a bridge program - a lot of hype, but when you look back you realize you learned a little and spent a bunch of money for that![]()
I think you missed the point, which was to allow us to separate the worthy people from the troglodytes by seeing who has a degree and who doesn't.
That and to post all the badass crap we've done.
If you're tired of a topic feel free to just skip those threads.
What follows is a generic mod comment:
Just like moving a thread that has no comedic value what-so-ever to the humor section?
You're right--in general. This is a competitive industry where the "bare minimum" isn't going to get you very far.
Without trying to sound too much like a cliche, the only constant in this market place is change. For kids coming into the industry right now, timing is definitely on their side--not something I'd hold against them.
When I graduated from college in December 2002 and started looking for a full-time flight instructing job in early 2003, . . .
Nevertheless, I enjoy the entertainment value that these consistent threads, about the same exact subjects provide. It shows the demographics of JC easier than a poll of if you have a 4 year degree or not.![]()
Doug Taylor said:There are plenty of commercial sources of information about careers in aviation, however I saw a need for a source of information made by professional pilots for future pilots and others that are interested in a "behind the scenes" perspective.
Ah, great minds (JTrain and you) think alike.
Kids? Kinda patronizing/condescending somewhat?
Let's see - Having left high school in 1971, I'm STILL not be inclined to call you a "kid." Where's your line drawn that makes them adults?
Your points made were quite substantive supported by your personal experiences. My opinion? I agree with you wholeheartedly.
. . .as I do agree with JTrain's perspective. . . without the perception of his being self-absorbed.
Gosh, people take "editorials" much too seriously. Make sure you vote!!!
Just so you know,I dont have a 4 year degree or a two year degree or any degree.I dont claim to be the greatest.I am no better than anyone on here ,and i sure aint no kiddie.And i will say again.If you plan on going to a major airline,Get the degree. .....T.C.Ah hell. . .you're right.
Sorry guys, let the fun continue. Who's next? Am I up yet? I'm ready.
What follows is a generic mod comment:
Just like moving a thread that has no comedic value what-so-ever to the humor section?
Nevertheless, I enjoy the entertainment value that these consistent threads, about the same exact subjects provide. It shows the demographics of JC easier than a poll of if you have a 4 year degree or not.All the 4 year degree kiddies claim they are the greatest, and all the non-4 year kiddies claim that they are the greatest.
The usual pilot vs pilot rivalry continues.
I'm better than you - NO! I'm better than YOU! - NO!! I'M BETTER THAN YOU!!!!11
The bottom line in all walks of life.
It's all about who you know.
Not necessarily true in this business. I papered the world with resumes. I got hired by the airline that I didn't know a soul at. All the other ones where I had personal recommendations didn't give me the time of day.
Good luck to you Alchemy,Keep plugging at it.,,,T.C.Yep, you need to get the degree...however you go about it is fine, as long as you get one.
Personally, I don't have one, and I'm often embarassed by that fact. I had a pretty bad experience in college, I went for 3 years, scraped by with my grades, and struggled to find something I enjoyed studying. I think it is important to go into college with something specific in mind that you would like to accomplish academically. I wandered around aimlessly from major to major. Also, like most, I was still a teenager. I lacked the maturity and self discpiline (and perhaps the intellectual capacity) to get the job done in most of the classes I attempted. Those instructors/professors were there to challenge you, not help you, and I wasn't up to the challenge. I definitely bit off more than I could chew with the academic "prestige" of the institution I chose to attend. That university chewed me up and spit me out, did nothing for my social life, and was overall a pretty miserable experience. Ultimately I used aviation as an outlet for my frustration at school. I flew every chance I got and worked at the FBO after school. I eventually earned my CFI and instruted summers and part time during my jr. year. I got a job offer from a regional at age 21 just prior to my senior year and I took it, abandoning my studies.
I'm not posting this story to garner sympathy, and I acknowledge that college is not 100% fun for anybody. There is a lot of hard work and struggling involved for just about anyone who earns a serious degree from an institution with a good reputation. Some people deal with those challenges better than others. I failed miserably, and it's one of the big regrets I have in my life.
I'm still taking classes and trying wrap up a bachelor's degree, but progress is slow and it's not easy to take classes and hold down a full time job, which is why I have a lot of respect for Kellwolf for pulling that off (one of the only people I know that has done it).
Ah hell. . .you're right.
Sorry guys, let the fun continue. Who's next? Am I up yet? I'm ready.
What follows is a generic mod comment:
Just like moving a thread that has no comedic value what-so-ever to the humor section?
Nevertheless, I enjoy the entertainment value that these consistent threads, about the same exact subjects provide. It shows the demographics of JC easier than a poll of if you have a 4 year degree or not.All the 4 year degree kiddies claim they are the greatest, and all the non-4 year kiddies claim that they are the greatest.
The usual pilot vs pilot rivalry continues.
I'm better than you - NO! I'm better than YOU! - NO!! I'M BETTER THAN YOU!!!!11
Topics repeat themselves on JC. They have to. There are tons of revolving new members who want advice and who don't know that we already had 73 safety pilot conversations in the last year. Think back to your first week on JC - all that info out there and it was all new to you. You didn't know that to some, the topics were very, very, well worn.
Personally, I think it is great that topics are repeated. Who knows when a member might have a new/different way of thinking or approaching a situation that could take the discussion in a whole new direction. That and I think the mods would prefer repeating topics rather than new members posting to topics several months old.
Would it be at all possible to collect ALL the significant college threads into one big sticky on the top of the forum?
That'd make it easier for those who don't use the search function to see the vast amount of information that has already been disseminated concerning the college topic.
Steve C is probably the most level-headed common sense oriented guy on JC. I really don't understand your mod comment.
Topics repeat themselves on JC. They have to. There are tons of revolving new members who want advice and who don't know that we already had 73 safety pilot conversations in the last year. Think back to your first week on JC - all that info out there and it was all new to you. You didn't know that to some, the topics were very, very, well worn.
Never mind we all know the search function sucks - more importantly, if we stopped discussing these "repeaters," what would be left? Politics?
The degree topic is important. New pilots really need to know that not having a degree could be a limiting factor for them - and they need to know in what ways it can be a limiting factor.
The manner this information was presented originally in this thread obviously leaves something to be desired. Either he was on a drunken rant or we need more discussions entitled "Perception and the Internet: How not to look like a know it all." I've hung out with Jtrain and sure enough like he says, the way he comes off on the internet is not like in real life. In my opinion though, that's little excuse - John's information would be better received by all if not laced with what could be perceived as self congratulatory conceit. I'm pretty sure I remember you (John) bagging on the manner in which Velo writes, saying his points would hold more weight if not for his writing style. (And I say that with love, brother - I'm just trying to help you out.)
Nonetheless, I think many of the "old salts" would agree that this is a topic that needs occasional recycling.