Pilot Fighter
Well-Known Member
Can you take a look at Kentucky's definition of reckless that I posted earlier in the thread? I am aware that it is a bit of a departure from many legal definitions I've seen.Allow to take a step back by saying I mean nothing personal, to you or anyone else, in applying the label of "smug superiority" to this discussion. My intent was to provide warning against simply dismissing the mistakes made by the crew as unintelligent, and not learning from them.
As to the issue of reckless homicide, I understand that you have a personal connection to the accident which (as you admit) removes your ability to be totally objective in this case. However, the law must be objective. I found the following in a definition for reckless homicide:
"In general, "recklessly" means that a person acts recklessly with respect to circumstances surrounding the conduct or the result of the conduct when the person is aware of, but consciously disregards, a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the accused person's standpoint."
http://definitions.uslegal.com/r/reckless-homicide/
To make a case for reckless homicide, you would have to argue that the crew understood the grave danger they were in and moved forward, regardless of the risks. I believe that the case is much more innocent than that. The crew engaged in nonpertinant conversation and were hampered by confirmation bias. It was an embarrassing, stupid mistake that in these circumstances turned tragic.
I appreciate the tone and thoughtfulness of your post.