Beginning of the end for US Airways?

danielsexton

Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
US Airways bankruptcy one month away
Report: Mid-September filing seen if cost cuts not made
Updated: 8:26 a.m. ET Aug. 13, 2004

NEW YORK - Investment bankers working for US Airways Group Inc.’s pilots union said the No. 7 U.S. airline could seek bankruptcy protection by mid-September if it does not get needed cost cuts, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

Bill Pollock, chairman of the Air Line Pilots Association union’s group at the Arlington, Virginia-based carrier, said in a letter that the union’s leadership “does not disagree in principal sic with the conclusions” reached by the union’s banker, Glanzer & Co., the newspaper said.

“The reality of our financial situation speaks for itself,” the letter said.

The airline did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The 26-page report, dated July 14 and released this week to 3,400 ALPA members, according to the newspaper, essentially confirms US Airways’ own wary outlook for its future.

The report said the carrier’s creditors have already put claims on its cash to minimize losses if US Airways collapses, the newspaper said, and that US Airways “might be worth more dead than alive to groups other than the employees” because other airlines might use its assets more profitably.

Last month, US Airways Chief Executive Bruce Lakefield told employees that if the carrier fails to cut costs, it “could just run out of steam sometime next year.”

US Airways lowered its cost structure during its eight months in bankruptcy protection in 2002 and 2003. But soaring fuel prices and growing market share among discount carriers have made it difficult for the carrier to succeed.

As part of its drive to cut costs by $1.5 billion, US Airways has said it needs about $800 million of labor concessions.

This includes $295 million from pilots, $263 million from mechanics and fleet service workers, $122 million from reservation agents and passenger service and ticket counter employees and $116 million from flight attendants.

Pilots have offered to take pay cuts of 12.5 percent and work more hours through 2008. Flight attendants have said they would discuss concessions.

The carrier recently said it would discontinue Pittsburgh as a flight hub. On Thursday it said it would halt nonstop service from that city on 20 routes, but maintain such service to more than 50 markets.

Copyright 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

[/ QUOTE ]

It has been widely speculated that at least one of the “majors” would have to go, I just hate that it looks like it will by one of my favorite airlines.
 
US Airways has been circling the drain since Wolf's intended sale to United was blocked by the Fed.

You can't cut costs to turn a profit .... until these managment teams figure this out all airlines are in trouble of going under.
 
Agreed! It is definatley an unfortunate situation for all US Airways Group pilots/employees that will have rippling effects for years to come but this isn't the beginning of the end - it's the end of the end for USAir. USAir has been having problems far, far longer than any of the other majors - quite frankly I'm surprised they're still here today.

Jason
 
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!
 
[ QUOTE ]
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Because at the Legacy carriers Labor costs come in second only to fuel costs... They can only get so much of a break on fuel costs, once they attain that, they move down the list to the next largest cost factor: Labor

This industry has changed forever... Anyone who is smart is planning ahead financially for the change and will deal with it... Tighten your belt folks, hope you've been saving for a "rainy day"... Doesn't look like much "sunshine" ahead... The "new industry' will look more like Seattle than Phoenix...
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Because at the Legacy carriers Labor costs come in second only to fuel costs... They can only get so much of a break on fuel costs, once they attain that, they move down the list to the next largest cost factor: Labor

This industry has changed forever... Anyone who is smart is planning ahead financially for the change and will deal with it... Tighten your belt folks, hope you've been saving for a "rainy day"... Doesn't look like much "sunshine" ahead... The "new industry' will look more like Seattle than Phoenix...

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno you can only cut pilot (and other labor groups) pay so much. With pilots, in particular, if there's no "golden major" to shoot for no one will go into flying. There will be no way to justify the expense of training and with the military cutting back on it's production of pilots ...

In the end I'm betting we see a march to the middle ... regional end pay may come up a little (as pilots realize they are stuck/going to stay there for a career start fighting for better wages) and major end pay come down a little. In other words I think things may "average" out a little better and this huge disparity between first and last jobs will be toned down a bit.

But what do I know. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Because at the Legacy carriers Labor costs come in second only to fuel costs... They can only get so much of a break on fuel costs, once they attain that, they move down the list to the next largest cost factor: Labor

This industry has changed forever... Anyone who is smart is planning ahead financially for the change and will deal with it... Tighten your belt folks, hope you've been saving for a "rainy day"... Doesn't look like much "sunshine" ahead... The "new industry' will look more like Seattle than Phoenix...

[/ QUOTE ]

Good time to stay in the military? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!

[/ QUOTE ]

OperatingExpenses.gif


These are the percentage operating expenses from two airlines from the last three months, as reported in their 10-Qs. They go after the wages because they're literally the biggest pice of the pie.
 
Notice how labor is 41 percent of SWA's costs and 38 percent of US Airways?

Gee, so maybe it isn't all labor's fault!

But hey, what do I know?
 
US Air cuts worry small cities
US Airways may be forced to file bankruptcy within a month unless it can secure large cuts from its labor groups, Reuters reports. While that's clearly bad news for the airline, a number of small cities served only by the carrier also are concerned. In 34 cities — mostly in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic — US Airways is the only airline in town, reports The New York Times (free registration). If the carrier cuts flights to those cities — or in the unlikely even that it shuts down altogether — travelers will have no options for commercial flights. And the cities may have a hard time attracting new service. Without local subsidies or federal grants, new airlines would be unlikely to step in, industry analyst Robert Mann told The Times. Posted at 7 a.m. ET
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/banghead.gif
 
Which cities? I know Mesa (or Air Midwest at least) serves a lot of ESA cities under the US Airways banner. I'm guessing if US Air folds, those flights will still continue.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but why is it always labor concessions? can't they find more cost cutting endeavors elsewhere? there are so many factors when it comes to making a profit with the airline that it seems they always blame the workers and want to take away their pay for doing their jobs?!

[/ QUOTE ]

OperatingExpenses.gif


These are the percentage operating expenses from two airlines from the last three months, as reported in their 10-Qs. They go after the wages because they're literally the biggest pice of the pie.

[/ QUOTE ]I wonder what's included in the "other" category?
 
Lost bags, travel vouchers, anything that needs to be comped probably. Just another example of how increasing customer service will ultimately increase profits.
 
MikeD: GREAT time to stay in the military.

Some of the Airways pilots did a lil number crunching earlier this year. They were able to determine that if they all worked for free, Airways would STILL have the highest CASM in the industry. Labor is not the source of U's woes, it's bad management, poor growth decisions, and an unsound business plan. What other major packs 3 hubs within an hour flight of each other?
 
Back
Top