Stories like this are why I still love aviation. It’s a fickle cruel mistress of a career but there is still a spark to be found.CF took me up for a sunset flight in 909 when I was a broke-ass 17-year-old hanging around the ramp at PFN enjoying having a day with one of my favorite planes of all time.
I had been there all day long, talking to people about the plane, telling people about her, answering questions. At the end of the day, I retreated to the fence to watch them start the engines and fly off, but one of the crew came over to me.
“Hey, want to go for a ride?” I still remember his grin.
It was amazing—one of my greatest—and fondest—aviation memories.
After the flight, he gave me a laminated photo of the plane over the statue of liberty. He told me to call them when I got my commercial.
I loved that plane and that organization, and this breaks my heart.
Grieve with the knowledge that the world grieves with you—there will always be a hole in my heart in the shape of that airplane and her crew.I am one of the B-17 pilots for Collings. We lost some fantastic pilots as well as several civilians today. I’m still in shock and completely numb. This has been the hardest hit to me in aviation, by far.
I am one of the B-17 pilots for Collings. We lost some fantastic pilots as well as several civilians today. I’m still in shock and completely numb. This has been the hardest hit to me in aviation, by far.
Sounds fair but I don't know what exemptions the operation had from the FAA. Vintage FEs can be hard to certify these days but are certainly needed if no.4 lets go which sounds like what happened here.I am not sure the B-17 has a required crew that included the F.E. to fly. I do know that in the days of the old piston liners at TWA at least, F.E. positions were filled by mechanics primarily and other than F.E. rating I am not sure how many of them had pilots licenses.
Required crew is one. These airplanes were flown single pilot during their firefighting days.
The FE isn’t a required position either.
Nothing out of the ordinary.
I hope they tighten the regulation in that case
Disagree. Carrying 10+ passengers, i want better trained crews. Not people quoting loopholes.Which regulation is that?
You don’t need a type to operate as SIC within the United States on any jet aircraft. The SIC in this case was appropriately rated.
Who says they’re not typed? You’re arguing with somebody that knows this operation well and everybody involved. If he says they were appropriately rated, then they were appropriately rated.Disagree. Carrying 10+ passengers, i want better trained crews. Not people quoting loopholes.
Disagree. Carrying 10+ passengers, i want better trained crews. Not people quoting loopholes.
I would imagine it’s a spring loaded response so they can figure out what they need to do to help.What’s up with ATC? Sheesh. Pilots say they need a return to the field, the first question should not be “what’s wrong, why do you want to come back?”
If a plane that size and age is requesting a return to field, it’s unlikely they are coming because they forgot the milk and eggs at the airport. Why not say, ok you wanna come back, turn this heading, that altitude. And once the guy seems to be headed back, then ask the reason for the return.
Don't you think it's a bit premature for that statement?Disagree. Carrying 10+ passengers, i want better trained crews. Not people quoting loopholes.