Carolyn,
Just a suggestion...but you might want to consider journalism.
I don't think Sig was saying all non-ATP CFIs are inferior...he was just defending what he's doing and his job. Just as you got offended by his comments. In your case, you're not looking for an Airline job whereas the people who attend and instruct at ATP generally are more airline/aviation goal oriented. They want to get to a flying job as soon as possible and </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
bouncing around the pattern in a Cessna 152 as part-time instructor
[/ QUOTE ] just doesn't cut it as far as their goals and how they want to accomplish it. If that works for you...more power to you! I admire you b/c I wouldn't want to sit around an FBO all day waiting for my next student (once I become a CFI of course). I'm not criticizing you either. Of course we need people to teach in 152/172s. As far as </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
You're global statements make it sound as if everyone comes to an ATP location a chump looking to justify his/her own job, and only by the superior and perfect instruction of people like you may they see the light.
[/ QUOTE ] Sig never said he was the CFI god and ATP turns out the greatest CFIs...he was merely pointing out a FACT that ATP gets 100s of calls/resumes from CFIs who want to instruct for ATP just because we do mostly multi-engine instruction. Granted total time is the thing looked at most on a resume...but multi time is also a big determining factor (otherwise why would there be a 200 hr multi requirement)? Best of luck to you.
SigAV8R
Just a suggestion...but you might want to consider journalism.
bouncing around the pattern in a Cessna 152 as part-time instructor
[/ QUOTE ] just doesn't cut it as far as their goals and how they want to accomplish it. If that works for you...more power to you! I admire you b/c I wouldn't want to sit around an FBO all day waiting for my next student (once I become a CFI of course). I'm not criticizing you either. Of course we need people to teach in 152/172s. As far as </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
You're global statements make it sound as if everyone comes to an ATP location a chump looking to justify his/her own job, and only by the superior and perfect instruction of people like you may they see the light.
[/ QUOTE ] Sig never said he was the CFI god and ATP turns out the greatest CFIs...he was merely pointing out a FACT that ATP gets 100s of calls/resumes from CFIs who want to instruct for ATP just because we do mostly multi-engine instruction. Granted total time is the thing looked at most on a resume...but multi time is also a big determining factor (otherwise why would there be a 200 hr multi requirement)? Best of luck to you.
SigAV8R