No. There were definitely more than 5 invites.So considering there were 5 interview invites and 6 hires basically I’m reading that if you get an interview you are basically in?
No. There were definitely more than 5 invites.So considering there were 5 interview invites and 6 hires basically I’m reading that if you get an interview you are basically in?
No. There were definitely more than 5 invites.
What made them go from 5 to 6?It appears that 6 people were hired from a pool of about 400 applicants.
2 from Horizon
1 from Northern Air Cargo
1 from Air Wisconsin
1 from Spirit
1 from Allegiant
I don’t knowWhat made them go from 5 to 6?
What made them go from 5 to 6?
Flight Keys grabs another one?!?!?Our director told us yesterday that we would possibly see another small class of 2-3 in 2025.
I would also assume that we will need a fairly sizable amount in the coming years as we get a new flight planning system, and the associated attrition for that.
I don’t have any contract information, but we do ok financially. It’s expensive here, but I think we have the best location of all the career airlines, so factor that in however you wish.
Our director told us yesterday that we would possibly see another small class of 2-3 in 2025.
I would also assume that we will need a fairly sizable amount in the coming years as we get a new flight planning system, and the associated attrition for that.
I don’t have any contract information, but we do ok financially. It’s expensive here, but I think we have the best location of all the career airlines, so factor that in however you wish.
They haven’t told us an amount for that but it’s coming soonAre yall still on track for the March 2025 market review?
They haven’t given us the official word but all signs point to that oneFlight Keys grabs another one?!?!?
Grassy ass, señor.
They haven’t given us the official word but all signs point to that one
EHhhhh it's okay. It does a few things (reroutes, diversions, and some of the tools for making routes in weather) extremely well. It also has a lot of flaws and bugs. At my carrier it has few, if any, people that just love it. Most are of the polar opposite opinion.Flight Keys is excellent. It takes some time getting used to the whole “brick theory” but once you do, it’s such an intuitive and time saving software. Not sure what y'all use now, but we at B6 went from FPM to FK and it’s night and day. Especially the ‘multi-select’ function.
EHhhhh it's okay. It does a few things (reroutes, diversions, and some of the tools for making routes in weather) extremely well. It also has a lot of flaws and bugs. At my carrier it has few, if any, people that just love it. Most are of the polar opposite opinion.
Far from terrible in my opinion but it's also far from time saving when you consider all the stuff you have to fix (bad routes, illegal alternates, if you aren't extremely careful it will continue to try to optimize and will change routes after release and then reinit'ing the route after an mel gets added so your crew has one route and atc has another) or the stuff we could do in bulk before (selecting a common runway, intersection, temp, field condition) that now has to be done manually for each flight. It's a wash on time savings. It does get intuitive though the more you use it.
I think it’s also how your backend dispatch support group sets it up. For example, as soon as we release a flight, the flight auto locks. Nothing will ever change the flight unless you manually go in and do it yourself.
We need to get us some of that. with ours, after we send it, it is still trying to re-optimize the plan. So it's not uncommon for you to get red brick alerts that the current optimized copy has a new altitude, and once you would get an mel, not uncommon at all that it's not it would change the route because instead of doing a "re-init" it was doing a "re-init route". We've just started manually locking the route manually once we send. My understanding is they're fixing that.
That'll help but overall I think it's a wash. It's not awful by any means. It's just differently good and differently bad.
Any idea if HA will be following along with that or will they keep NavBlue until the merger?They haven’t given us the official word but all signs point to that one
One thing I love that I have seen a lot lately is the flight will calculate with a Method 1 Driftdown. Something happens and after flightkeys recalcs suddenly it becomes a method 2 despite the original release being Method 1. I love flightkeys overall but this is probably the most annoying thing I have seen with Flightkeys since it rolled out.We need to get us some of that. with ours, after we send it, it is still trying to re-optimize the plan. So it's not uncommon for you to get red brick alerts that the current optimized copy has a new altitude, and once you would get an mel, not uncommon at all that it's not it would change the route because instead of doing a "re-init" it was doing a "re-init route". We've just started manually locking the route manually once we send. My understanding is they're fixing that.
That'll help but overall I think it's a wash. It's not awful by any means. It's just differently good and differently bad.
One thing I love that I have seen a lot lately is the flight will calculate with a Method 1 Driftdown. Something happens and after flightkeys recalcs suddenly it becomes a method 2 despite the original release being Method 1. I love flightkeys overall but this is probably the most annoying thing I have seen with Flightkeys since it rolled out.