Rage Against The Machine
Well-Known Member
Whatever you say.![]()
We'll wait and see ..!
Whatever you say.![]()
I'm sure everyone is soooooo scared of the threatening letter. Since they aren't even doing anything illegal.
Check the case law. What you think is legal probably isn't.
I'd love to.
Got a cite or maybe a case name?
I seem to remember an injunction about a sickout or slowdown in the desert, in the not too distant past...I'd love to.
Got a cite or maybe a case name?
I'd love to.
Got a cite or maybe a case name?
Dude, I'm not an attorney, so I can't remember those crazy names and numbers that you guys use for cases.The most relevant as it relates to what AMR is alleging, though, would be the Delta case from about 10-12 years ago, where the 11th circuit actually ruled that ALPA didn't only have an obligation to not start job actions, but also had an affirmative obligation to stop job actions started by others. In that case, the alleged job action was a write-up campaign, and the judge ruled that anything violating the status quo, including increasing the number of maintenance write-ups, even if the write-ups were legitimate, is an illegal job action. I'm sure you can find the case number if you go digging, but I'm not even sure where you lawyer types look for that stuff.
FAA seems to agree with the Pilots vs the Denise Lynn threat letter..Check the case law. What you think is legal probably isn't.
FAA seems to agree with the Pilots vs the Denise Lynn threat letter.
is that because the maintenance is worse, or because of heightened oversight? If I were the FAA, I would surveil the crap out of a carrier in bankruptcy protection.I have no clue what is happening on the AA side of the house, but I can tell you over the last 1.5 - 2 months I have seen more MEL's and have found more items on post and pre-flights then the last 4 years combined.