Oh absolutely, but if I'm ACTUALLY rested, I just don't care about doing all sorts of shady things with the paperwork to look legal. Hell, our legs are short enough, load up on redbull I have to. I'm doing what's safer to me over legal always. Showing up early to the airport on a crappy day so that my mind is at ease for the flight, but checking in at normal time for example. Or fudging things so that I'm legal when I get back home. Hmm, sleep in a recliner/hotel and eat vending machine food/fast food/gas station food, or go 15 minutes over and putting whatever I feel like as the actual duty off time and sleeping in my own bed. I'll punch the FAA inspector in the face if he thinks the prior is safer! Ok, not really, but I hope if I ever got caught, the guy would see the stupidity of that reg being followed to the letter. Either way, I have a good lawyer.Well it also isn't worth doing it for a company that could care less about you also. Especially if you aren't taken care of on the back end. There was no way in hell I was short changing my off time for AMF lol.
That's why you aren't supposed to use your real name on here!You know the FAA has been know. To cruise these forums, right?
Oh absolutely, but if I'm ACTUALLY rested, I just don't care about doing all sorts of shady things with the paperwork to look legal.
Safe>legal. That's my thought process, period. Paperwork and regs don't make the airplane fly or get me back home.Wow...... Please evaluate your thought process.
I don't really care honestly. I'd never post anything that I DID do, just what I WOULD do.You know the FAA has been know. To cruise these forums, right?
Safe>legal. That's my thought process, period. Paperwork and regs don't make the airplane fly or get me back home.
A 9 hour overnight that is aligned with my primary WOCL is safer than 18 hours that doesn't line up with my primary WOCL.Not sure how you can view reducing your rest as being safer, but ok.
A 9 hour overnight that is aligned with my primary WOCL is safer than 18 hours that doesn't line up with my primary WOCL.
If I have a split day (fly in the AM, 'released into rest', fly in the PM), whatever gets me back to my bed faster is safer. Split duty sucks, mostly because I'm wide awake when I should be "resting".Agreed, but that isn't decided by the pilot. The schedule is, whatever the schedule is. So if your only rest is between hours that aren't optimum, and you are going back on duty regardless, how is reducing that amount of rest safer?
Indeed. One that comes up for me, is I'll do a shift, but sleep all night and be well rested. 10am rolls around and I'm a pumpkin regardless that at that point I'm the most rested I'll be all day.If I have a split day (fly in the AM, 'released into rest', fly in the PM), whatever gets me back to my bed faster is safer. Split duty sucks, mostly because I'm wide awake when I should be "resting".
Note, I'm mostly arguing for sake of arguing here and have no vested interest. More providing some examples of "legal, but silly". Rest rules are funny things, and fatigue is such an individualized condition that it's really, truly hard to prescribe regulations that translate to actual safety for all.
I know I'm coming off as a colossal D-bag. Sterile internet posts you know. Not my intent.Not sure how you can view reducing your rest as being safer, but ok.
I don't really care honestly. I'd never post anything that I DID do, just what I WOULD do.
It only takes one or two pilots to fudge the numbers a bit to set a bad, bad precedent. And to openly talk about doing such things on a public forum? Really?
+1You must be new to freight doggin'. Without "liberal" interpretation of the numbers, freight wouldn't move. Even the big boys do it.