American 767 RTO at ORD

Update from the NTSB:
http://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/pr20161104.aspx
2 seconds from engine failure to TL retardation. Well done gents!

d351a97f0374c4a9001942145b55ad95.jpg
 
I hope it's a cake made to look like this:
DCA17FA021-photo1.jpg
That is frightening on many levels. Apparently a few of these engines have failed prior to hot section inspection due to a similar fault. The cracks that started that would be impossible to find without disassembly. Tossing out turbine disks at takeoff power with an airplane full of people that didn't get hurt is just pure luck. (Luck=Preparation+Opportunity)
 
That is frightening on many levels. Apparently a few of these engines have failed prior to hot section inspection due to a similar fault. The cracks that started that would be impossible to find without disassembly. Tossing out turbine disks at takeoff power with an airplane full of people that didn't get hurt is just pure luck. (Luck=Preparation+Opportunity)
At least 3 HPT disk failures over the years...which given the number of fleet hours is still pretty low but compared to other engine families kind of high.
 
Avherld has a report of a fan disk found a half mile away on the UPS ramp. If true thats amazing

Thank god the cover is on there. I once hit the top of a rubber cone with a prop. Maybe an ounce of orange rubber was found 500yds away. I could only throw it a few feet as hard as I could.. I can't even imagine how many miles the blades would go ejected without the cover.
 
At least 3 HPT disk failures over the years...which given the number of fleet hours is still pretty low but compared to other engine families kind of high.
I'm not suggesting they ground the fleet, it's just disconcerting having a handful of similar failures from a group of engines that are being operated/maintained within the manufacturers recommendations. I wonder if they will trace it back to a common manufacturing flaw. Regardless, the crew did a darn near perfect abort, taking that thing into the air would've been a handful. I wonder how it would've ended had they continued the take off, without the pool of fuel under the wing the airframe might not have caught fire. Devils advocate nonsense ponderings.
 
I'm not suggesting they ground the fleet, it's just disconcerting having a handful of similar failures from a group of engines that are being operated/maintained within the manufacturers recommendations. I wonder if they will trace it back to a common manufacturing flaw. Regardless, the crew did a darn near perfect abort, taking that thing into the air would've been a handful. I wonder how it would've ended had they continued the take off, without the pool of fuel under the wing the airframe might not have caught fire. Devils advocate nonsense ponderings.

It's anyone's guess. Could've ended up like the Concorde, or not. Hard to say. Glad they didn't have to test it though.
 
I'm not suggesting they ground the fleet, it's just disconcerting having a handful of similar failures from a group of engines that are being operated/maintained within the manufacturers recommendations. I wonder if they will trace it back to a common manufacturing flaw. Regardless, the crew did a darn near perfect abort, taking that thing into the air would've been a handful. I wonder how it would've ended had they continued the take off, without the pool of fuel under the wing the airframe might not have caught fire. Devils advocate nonsense ponderings.
I'm not a metallurgist, but reading other similar events on both the CF6 and other engine series 2 repeated themes come up: metallurgical impurities, and handling/tooling damage.
 
Back
Top