It's not.If they're aiming for something completely automated, how many jobs is this initiative going to create?
Two things will happen. Thieves will shoot down and steal whatever the drone is carrying and hackers will hack into the systems to intentionally crash drones.
mshunter said:Scenario 1, yes, I can totally see that. Scenario 2, only if you give them an avenue to do that. With the new 2.4ghz spread spectrum technology, I see that being difficult. And the most surefire way is eliminating the wireless programming all together. Just put a GPS tracker on it, and plug the thing in to tell it where you need it to go.
Nah it'll be fine, GPS is so reliable!Great. Entirely autonomous and uncontrollable drones. I can't see how that might become a problem.![]()
The plus side is you could order more beer without risk of DUI![]()
Postmates!
Wait, I wonder if that works for alcoholic beverages… probably not because then it'd put the onus on the delivery driver to ensure that you're of legal age.
At least you could use Uber. I love Uber.
Good for him. I don't think we want to live in a world were these darn things are zippin over are heads all the time....(Uh oh are the old guys getting to me?!)http://fortune.com/2015/07/29/shoot-drone-privacy/?xid=soc_socialflow_facebook_FORTUNE
Looks like someone decided to blast a $1800 one out of the air....
http://fortune.com/2015/07/29/shoot-drone-privacy/?xid=soc_socialflow_facebook_FORTUNE
Looks like someone decided to blast a $1800 one out of the air....
While I agree that it's trespassing, what about the supreme court case with the chicken farmer vs the USAF? I wonder if that will guide rules on who owns the airspace above their property. Because as it stands now, the owner does not to my knowledge.The article mentions "trespassing", gotta agree with that. When these things have not only cameras recording, but live view, loitering over someone's property at low altitude should absolutely be considered trespassing.
The problem is not with the drones. It's the fact that they are easy to operate, which allows morons to purchase and operate them as they please.
Wait until Amazon buys Uber to use drivers for same day deliveries![]()
While I agree that it's trespassing, what about the supreme court case with the chicken farmer vs the USAF? I wonder if that will guide rules on who owns the airspace above their property. Because as it stands now, the owner does not to my knowledge.
Um. What?Scenario 1, yes, I can totally see that. Scenario 2, only if you give them an avenue to do that. With the new 2.4ghz spread spectrum technology, I see that being difficult. And the most surefire way is eliminating the wireless programming all together. Just put a GPS tracker on it, and plug the thing in to tell it where you need it to go.
I think that will be the main problem with the drones.Actually, 0 - 200ft means I won't ever have to pay for clay pigeons for skeet shooting any more....
I don't really care what the drone is carrying, I just want to shoot it for the sake of smashing stuff.
My future children will be excellent marksmen, they'll be getting plenty of practiceWhen I was growing up, we would take bb guns and just shoot birds along the fence or on the light poles. I can't imagine being a kid and seeing little helicopters flying around with gifts attached to them. It could be Christmas everyday.