A flow back to hell should not exist since hell should have never existed to begin with. Scope would have prevented hell from existing.Your Captain was right. The most important things for a Captain are pay rates and retirement. Scope is for junior pilots who are scared of furloughs, but with a proper flow thru agreement with flow back provisions as RJ Captains, the fear of furloughs can be mitigated.
I recently told a captain the most important thing in any contract was scope, and not rates.
He informed me I was young and short sighted.
If you are senior you want $$$ and retirement. Sorry, but this "brotherhood" of pilots you talk about doesn't exist. Call it pulling up the ladder if you will, but privately, most senior pilots will agree with me.
If you are senior you want $$$ and retirement. Sorry, but this "brotherhood" of pilots you talk about doesn't exist. Call it pulling up the ladder if you will, but privately, most senior pilots will agree with me.
This is great that you(royal you) see the negative side of top end scope. The more JV's and codeshares signed with loose language means the larger aircraft get parked. This leads to fewer high paying jobs and flexibility. Everyone on the seniority list and in the airline industry should be concerned with scope. It's not just RJ's!I'm pretty senior (6000 out of 14,000) and I don't agree with you.
Scope is for people that care about mergers along with outsourcing. Any CA should be scared of a merger. Especially at a young LCC that could get swallowed by a big legacy in the future. Just ask the Airtran guys...
Your Captain was right. The most important things for a Captain are pay rates and retirement. Scope is for junior pilots who are scared of furloughs, but with a proper flow thru agreement with flow back provisions as RJ Captains, the fear of furloughs can be mitigated.
Haha. You're pretty funny when you're wrong.
If you are senior you want $$$ and retirement. Sorry, but this "brotherhood" of pilots you talk about doesn't exist. Call it pulling up the ladder if you will, but privately, most senior pilots will agree with me.
This is great that you(royal you) see the negative side of top end scope. The more JV's and codeshares signed with loose language means the larger aircraft get parked. This leads to fewer high paying jobs and flexibility. Everyone on the seniority list and in the airline industry should be concerned with scope. It's not just RJ's!
I beg to differ. Based upon seggy and todds rabid rants about seniority integration, I relish that a Chicago based airline "swallow us up." I would be seggys captain.A flow back to hell should not exist since hell should have never existed to begin with. Scope would have prevented hell from existing.
Scope is for people that care about mergers along with outsourcing. Any CA should be scared of a merger. Especially at a young LCC that could get swallowed by a big legacy in the future. Just ask the Airtran guys...
with 5 or 10 year fences you probably wouldn't unless he bid across.I beg to differ. Based upon seggy and todds rabid rants about seniority integration, I relish that a Chicago based airline "swallow us up." I would be seggys captain.
(Assuming their points of view were taken).
The other ulcc: they're screwed at the worst possible screwing a screw could be screwed.
Again, all because of scope.
so you're saying he's short and young sighted?