AAG "Special Investor Update" Tomorrow, 11 July

[mrivc211]

It'll be a cold day in hell before I take 'advice' from a Skywest pilot not named Autothrust Blue.

Way to troll though, we'll give you a golf clap for trying.

You sure are strung up for a surfer guy life's short have a donut

 

[SlumTodd_Millionaire]

67% with 93% voting is the number I saw. That's hardly 2 to 1.

I'm certainly not a math wiz, but I'm pretty sure 2/3 is the very definition of 2 to 1.

I agree that AS had no scope protection before and AAG was free to do whatever they wanted. I think that is all the more reason to push for scope this time around. But that's just me and I'm not on the lower end of the legacy 737 payscale so my priorities might be a bit different.

Scope is a tough nut to crack. You can't strike over it. It's not tangible, so most of your members don't really understand it or value it. It usually doesn't score highly in polling. Management usually wants something really big in return for concessions on it. Etc.

I've always been a bit of a scope hawk. I would give up quite a bit to secure strong scope. But I'm not most pilots.

 

[Autothrust Blue]

Scope is a tough nut to crack. You can't strike over it. It's not tangible, so most of your members don't really understand it or value it. It usually doesn't score highly in polling. Management usually wants something really big in return for concessions on it. Etc.

I've always been a bit of a scope hawk. I would give up quite a bit to secure strong scope. But I'm not most pilots.

When the old man saw the first EMB-120 taxi by in Salt Lake City, he got really bothered, went to a (D)ALPA meeting, and the official answer was "we don't want that little airplane."

Oooookay then!

 

[BobDDuck]

I'm certainly not a math wiz, but I'm pretty sure 2/3 is the very definition of 2 to 1.

Yeah, you're right. That's what I get for trying to post while memorizing flows and limitations.