KLB
Well-Known Member
I’d be concerned about the liability should there ever be an incident and resulting investigation such as a runway conflict. Not that I ever plan of having one, but I’ve had towers clear me across a runway at small fields which are currently occupied. LEB tower still owes my FO and I a beer. I imagine “crew intentionally disabled a safety device because it was annoying” wouldn’t age well.
That being said, I still hate it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah. I can also seeing RAAS causing an incident also if the database isn't up to date or there are changes to the airport layout in between updates. It slices both ways I guess. Of course RAAS is labeled as a "situational awareness tool" and is sure to spell this out in the AFM limitations section for all the manufacturers' lawyers out there.