Is not voting a no vote, or do the yes votes have to beat out no votes?
So not voting is essentially voting yes.
Is not voting a no vote, or do the yes votes have to beat out no votes?
Ain't this some amazing motivation to sign the TA?
"If you're an FO, you're losing your job no matter what. If you're in the top 14% of the company, you'll remain a captain, but you'll take a pay cut. If you're in the top 15-28% of the company, you'll be downgraded and take a $50,000 a year pay cut, but keep your job. If you don't sign this, you'll all lose your jobs."
The outcome is already pre-ordained, Comair style.Releasing the fleet plan is an interesting thing to do in this case. It basically gives two-thirds of the pilot group no incentive whatsoever to vote in favor. I have to wonder whether management's intent is to encourage a no vote, then blame the pilots for voting no when they shut down the airline. In other words, just seeking a scapegoat when they already have a pre-determined outcome.
I don't see what the problem is here. The Union will protect you, right? Oh wait. Maybe the union is part of the problem here? Just maybe....
Agreed.... Terrible timing and classless.Remember when your mother used to tell you that something was not the right place, nor the right time?
This is one of them.
Didn't Delta say they wanted to cut down on the DCI carriers significantly?Even if voted down someone has to fly those 900s.... 9e has plenty of pilots and it'd seem logical and the quickest route for Delta still no? I mean if they give more to SKW or Gojets doesn't that almost put Delta limited to few regional feeds and in an unfavorable and limited ability to do their famous whipsawing that they love with the DCI shuffle?
If no more 9e that leaves what.... SKW Inc., Transtates Inc., and Republic only? Seems like their shuffling abilities will be greatly limited and something DAL will suddenly be limited with their DCI bullying abilities?