AUAeropilot
Well-Known Member
Hear say is cleared to land 27L, later cleared for side step 27R, and then the landing on M.
Still speculation but that's what I know.
Still speculation but that's what I know.
Actually, that is A17 and A15.I do feel like a dummy. I taxied all the way out to A17 last monday and was wondering what I-X-A-T spelled.
~D
The sun would just be coming up and in your eyes at the time of the landing (if landing 9L). I haven't heard if they were using east or west flow.
Now that I hear that it was a west flow obviously the sun (or lack thereof) would not be a factor. Also, 27R is not a CAT III runway so it does not have the approach lighting system of the rest.
From what I remember, 27R has a MALSF/MALSR...def not an ALSF2. Does ATL turn on the approach lighting system for 27R that early in the morning when the redeyes/South America flights are starting to come in?
Not that I've seen. The only planes I've seen land on 27R are emergencies that need the length or need to be close to the terminal. That and the occasional really late in the evening when nothing is going on.
That's what I thought I remembered...I know a few times we landed on the inboards, but only early morning arrivals.
I tell ya, this not flying/furlough thing sucks balls...
Again!?
I find it extremely good advice to always have a final course guidance active. Localizer, gps, vor, anything that will alert you should you line up for the wrong runway, or even a taxiway. Especially at large, parrallel dominant airports.
A similiar problem was happening in SEA for a while I recall.
Yep, always a good idea. I wonder if since he may have side slipped he had the other ILS setup and therefore didn't have his back up? :dunno:
It's unfortunate that it happend at all, luckily no bent metal or injuries - but you are right on that if this was a regional it would be a different reaction. No one flying is excempt from mistakes, hopefully this crew won't lose their job over this - Fly Safe.I can't help but think of the firestorm on new stations and web-boards if this was a regional aircraft involved instead of a heavy mainline aircraft.
I.e. going to BDA on a VMC day and the plane in front of you gears up on the one runway, and you don't have fuel for ACK.
Wow...
Anyone got the METAR from around that time?
NTSB INVESTIGATING LANDING OF COMMERCIAL JETLINER ON TAXIWAY IN ATLANTA
<hr>The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the landing of a Delta B-767 on an active taxiway at Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport (ATL).
According to preliminary information received from several sources, on Monday, October 19, 2009, at 6:05 a.m. EDT, a Boeing B767-332ER (N185DN) operating as Delta Air Lines flight 60 from Rio de Janeiro to Atlanta landed on taxiway M at ATL after being cleared to land on runway 27R. No injuries to any of the 182 passengers or 11 crewmembers were reported.
A check airman was on the flight deck along with the captain and first officer. During cruise flight, the check airman became ill and was relocated to the cabin for the remainder of the flight. A medical emergency was declared and the company was notified by the crew. A determination was made to land at the scheduled destination of ATL.
The flight was cleared to land on runway 27R but instead landed on taxiway M, which is situated immediately to the north and parallel to runway 27R. The runway lights for 27R were illuminated; the localizer and approach lights for 27R were not turned on. Taxiway M was active but was clear of aircraft and ground vehicles at the time the aircraft landed. The wind was calm with 10 miles visibility.Night/dark conditions prevailed; twilight conditions began at about 7:20 a.m. EDT and the official sunrise was at 7:46 a.m. EDT.
A team of four from the NTSB, led by David Helson, is investigating the incident.
Well there was a medical emergency so maybe it was intentional