SlumTodd_Millionaire
Most Hated Member
I'm more making a commentary about the lack of science that was done to establish 60, and the lack of science done for moving the lack of science mandate to 65. Namely, there was no science either way.
With guys corking it at 66, one wonders if 65 is really a good idea at all.
This simply isn't true. I'm not sure if it can be found anywhere online nowadays, as it was before the age of everything being on YouTube and such, but Captain Woerth gave testimony on numerous occasions before Congressional committees laying out the science of why ALPA supported Age 60. It's a shame that he wasn't re-elected in 2006, because if he had been, Age 60 almost certainly would have remained in place, and a whole lot of pilots would have avoided furloughs, downgrades, and career stagnation.