Murdoughnut
Well sized member
Who has jurisdiction over a person's behavior when over international airspace? If someone did access some illegal images, where would it be adjudicated?
In Flight Porn? A little "creative"
- Thread starter derg
- Start date
milski
Well-Known Member
The only real way to block it is to make it really slow - anything else can be worked around with the right amount of effort.
WalterSobchak
Well-Known Member
They still sell Hustler and Swank in the airport so what the big deal? As long as no one is "roughing up the suspect" in front of every one nothing has changed. Plus a lot of people have porn on their ipods and i phones already.
captainphil
Well-Known Member
They really sell porn at the airport?
surreal1221
Well-Known Member
So long as employees have free access - I'll be happy. 
Screaming_Emu
Joe Conventional
Oh yeah...nothing like standing there in uniform checking out the newest road and track magazine. But right above that one is all the porn and then people start lookin at you strange.
Firebird2XC
Well-Known Member
Because we want to protect our soldiers from filthy pornography!
Wait- then what the hell was I fighting for?
ready2fly
Well-Known Member
There are articles?I read it for the articles man.....
killbilly
Vocals, Lyrics, Triangle, Washboard, Kittens
Gonna be interesting to see how they do that. Blocking SIP calls (which is what 99% of VoIP services use) is relatively easy to do. Blocking certain other types as well as things picked up on VPN networks is going to be a different matter.
Yeah, you can hack around it, but it would be an academic exercise. There's not enough time on most flights to do it. Why bother? You'll be in cell coverage in a matter of a few hours anyway.
thepedroid
Well-Known Member
You're right, it can't be enforced and it will never become a requirement. Even if ICANN did decide to overturn the ruling to not allow .xxx, the cost from the registry was supposed to be around 60 bucks a year. That means the registrars will be charging quite a bit more than that (prob a multi year minimum too)
I think this wifi stuff is awesome. I'm sure the FA's will be able to handle any pervs that think its ok to watch boobies bounce in public.
thepedroid
Well-Known Member
thats exactly why someone would bother with it, the academic exercise and bragging rights to being the first person to hack it.
killbilly
Vocals, Lyrics, Triangle, Washboard, Kittens
Nah. All you'd be doing is accessing the router and messing with the port-forwarding permissions, really. And if they intentionally put in a non-SIP-aware router in the plane, hacking the router ain't gonna help - you'll get one-way audio, which is useless.
There's no point in hacking it for VoIP, is what I'm saying.
If they allow VPN access, it's a little different.
thepedroid
Well-Known Member
ahh... gotcha.
Mad Doggy Dog
Well-Known Member
.
Yes.
Most other countries have evolved cultures with healthy attitudes toward sexuality, and are not leaning towards dogmatic theocracy like the USA.
Oh no, I saw boob!!! Now I'm gonna go to hell. Noooooo. If only there were some right wing fundamentalists to save me from myself.
In Europe, they threw out all the religious kill-joys 200 - 300 hundred years ago. Those people came to the USA. This is why Amsterdam is a blast and Grand Rapids is boring.
Besides, you should see whats on TV at night in Germany.
.
mjg407
Well-Known Member
here's what you do, take 3 tylenol pm.... you win every time
SpiraMirabilis
Possible Subversive
Has anyone considered the real threat this represents? IN FLIGHT JETCAREERS.
Imagine if this gets placed on regional aircraft.
CA: "Flaps 15, landing checks."
FO: "BOGGLE. I need to finish this post about how some other guy is an unsafe pilot for taking his shoulder harnesses off below 10,000ft."
Imagine if this gets placed on regional aircraft.
CA: "Flaps 15, landing checks."
FO: "BOGGLE. I need to finish this post about how some other guy is an unsafe pilot for taking his shoulder harnesses off below 10,000ft."
