I dont think Flight instructing is all what its put out to be. I learned alot Flight Instructing private pilot students, But I would say I had a better chance passing an airline Interview Sim After I got done fresh out of ATP where I flew Star's and DP's every day. Now all I do as a flight instructor is watch my students fly circles doing stalls, and slow flight which you dont do in jets.
I guess I should start using my double eye...
JonnyB, right there with ya brother. On a side note if I'm not misstaken I've seen that altimiter in a LR-31... but mine said FL510 ;-)
Argh.
You could train a monkey to pass an airline interview sim ride. It doesn't really matter--that's not really where you prove how capable a pilot you are. That happens on the job. The experience you gain as an instructor will be really, really valuable later in your career.
And what these people don't know is that so much of the basics don't get covered in airline training. Getting through ground school and the sim are one thing. The real world is another. There is just no substitute for experience when you get to the real world.
Umm...not that I really want to get into this low time debate, because really this is the "interview" section, but when I interviewed, 5 people passed the sim ride out of 20. You'd be surprised how many people, reguardless of their hours, just plain suck at flying instruments.
Thats true, at my interview recently only 6 of 21 made it. I am a low timer(410TT) and think I did pretty good considering I was one of the 6. I heard the staff talking about how many applicants including the high timers couldn't fly the sim or an ILS for that matter! It does boil down to quality of time. I instructed at a class D airport outside of BOS bravo space and it was very rewarding. And I dont think I am anywhere near Chuck Yeager. I am aware of the challenges that are ahead but confident in my abilities and know I will be a good FO. The sim seemed just like another airplane so I just flew the darn thing! If one was born to do this it will show as most of you know.
Umm...not that I really want to get into this low time debate, because really this is the "interview" section, but when I interviewed, 5 people passed the sim ride out of 20. You'd be surprised how many people, reguardless of their hours, just plain suck at flying instruments.
Thanks for getting this thread back on track. "Low Time Interviews"
I know lots of people wants to know about the interviews, but many low timers are afraid to talk about it, because of this debate.
Unfortunately, certain people create an environment that makes people afraid to ask questions for fear of being attacked for being a "low timer".
I was in the military, I've worked with, been trained by, and have trained people from various walks of life.
Don't listen to anyone else. If you meet the minimums and get offered an interview, and you think you are ready - to not only successfully complete the training, but to also be an Airline pilot - then go for it. Not a single person should influence your decision on whether or not to interview or take the job. As a low timer, you may be expected to show a knowledge and skill level of someone with much more time then you. This is a good thing for you!
If you are offered a job, then it becomes your job to work your tail off to prove that you belong there. And it doesn't stop after the checkride, or after IOE. You need to prove EVERY single DAY flying the line that you deserve to be in that right seat. Sure, you may face some adversity on the line because you're a low timer - I had to face it too with certain Captains. But after said Captains allowed me to prove to them that I do belong there, they complimented me. Before you know it, you're not a "low time" guy anymore. You're a damn pilot bitchin about workin too much and gettin paid too little!![]()
I finished in only 16 hrs or so and he was very confident that I would do well. I was told after the second day of IOE that I would have no problems and only needed to work on the little things. And yes I did hand fly approaches at 210 to the final fix in a busy class B airspace with a tropical storm and high crosswinds and managed to grease the landing :rawk:
16hrs sounds a lot shorter than a normal IOE at Gulfstream International Airlines.![]()
PS> I also think there is some bitterness on this site about low-timers, because a lot of guys were unfortunate enough to have finished their ratings around 9-11, and since THEY had 1200 hours when they were hired, they get a little pissed when they hear about guys getting hired with 350-500 hours.
I was in medical school for a while, and during my first year there were some huge changes going on in the medical community about residency training...for the last 100 years residents were expected to work 120 hours a week, not for any particular reason--just because all the older docs had to do it, so they expected the new guys to do it. It was a rite of passage similar to hazing at a frat. Finally someone realized there was no significant increase in competence resulting from working 120 as opposed to 80 hours per week, and they passed some regs prohibiting people from working that much.
It's not a precise comparison, but I think there is definitely a "rite of passage" component to the whole "you can't fly an RJ without instructing for 500 hours first" thing.
I can say that I feel very confident on my abilities, so did my IOE captain since I finished in only 16 hrs or so and he was very confident that I would do well. I was told after the second day of IOE that I would have no problems and only needed to work on the little things. And yes I did hand fly approaches at 210 to the final fix in a busy class B airspace with a tropical storm and high crosswinds and managed to grease the landing
Its alarming to me that at less than 400tt, YOU felt confident after 16 hours of jet. Brother, you have no idea how much you don't know. Glad you figured out the most important things like greasing landings, next time your skipper lands firm... offer up some pointers.