T/O w/FSII
Well-Known Member
Look up where?
Was it generic type IV or anything better like Clariant SW or Cryotech Polar?
“Look up where”
And this is how I know you have only essentially done one job in aviation before.
Look up where?
Was it generic type IV or anything better like Clariant SW or Cryotech Polar?
It's January in a harsh winter and suddenly @Cherokee_Cruiser is a deice fluid expert?Look up where?
Was it generic type IV or anything better like Clariant SW or Cryotech Polar?
It's January in a harsh winter and suddenly @Cherokee_Cruiser is a deice fluid expert?
No, but those two have higher holdover times.
Which one leaves mysterious orange puddles under the wings of airplanes in the hangar during winter ops? I'm not de-ice fluid fluent.No, but those two have higher holdover times.
Sure, but doesn’t do much good when you call the iceman at :17 but don’t actually take off until :44
Are you pulling those numbers using the weather at the time of the incident?
Agreed but doesn’t look like flaps 20 in the pics I’ve seen. Not saying that’s its just potentially a contributing factorI can't imagine the flaps not at 20°. The Challengers have a configuration warning that includes brakes, flaps, autopilot, spoilers, and stab trim.
I haven’t seen a clear enough photo to see where they were positioned.Agreed but doesn’t look like flaps 20 in the pics I’ve seen. Not saying that’s its just potentially a contributing factor
True, a fault is always a possibility. With the abundance of sensors for these flaps I would be surprised that they were all failed.Configuration warnings depend on a lot of inputs (and those inputs are as likely to fail as any other input) and should be considered as a back up to remind you if you forgot something, and because they can fail it's still up to you. The G-IV that ran off the runway with the gust lock on a few years ago comes to mind. I'm not trying to feed into a conspiracy about this airplane not being correctly configured for take off, I'm just saying it's the pilots job to never hear the warning because everything is properly configured when the levers go to full power.
“Look up where”
And this is how I know you have only essentially done one job in aviation before.
Sure, but doesn’t do much good when you call the iceman at :17 but don’t actually take off until :44
Did they use the RCC 5 switch if installed?I haven’t seen a clear enough photo to see where they were positioned.
“i went to bangor 15 years ago”
DID THEY HAVE CLARIANT SAFEWING I READ THE METAR THEY SHOULDBE FINEI went to Leaver instead
Just bleating out the brand names does not make you appear ‘informed’Look up where?
Was it generic type IV or anything better like Clariant SW or Cryotech Polar?
That should be separate from the DAUs, plus I don't see it on any of our 600 series documents. Is that a 300-only switch?Did they use the RCC 5 switch if installed?
What matters is if the fluid has failed or not.
You can be within your holdover time, but if it’s lost effectiveness, thats what matters.
If there’s ANY question, pre-takeoff contamination check. If any lingering doubt then, [PA ALL] “Well everyone, we have bad news…”