Roger Roger
Bottom of the list
TF you think a PC12 is made out ofMaybe? You think he was manually flying the aircraft into the flight levels?
Moderate turbulence was reported. Could he have found some stronger turbulence that damaged the aircraft?
TF you think a PC12 is made out ofMaybe? You think he was manually flying the aircraft into the flight levels?
Moderate turbulence was reported. Could he have found some stronger turbulence that damaged the aircraft?
That last one was nothing but a death wish. The NTSB report was sickening.
“The PC12 cannot be destroyed my normal turbulence Fholbert son of Gloin.”TF you think a PC12 is made out of
Maybe not knowingly. Have you ever checked your scoreboard and found that the AP wasn’t actually engaged? Or the mode you thought you’d selected wasn’t showing engaged? I know I have.Maybe? You think he was manually flying the aircraft into the flight levels?
The King autopilots in those legacies do have a history of a number of different “interesting” failure modes (reference another medevac crash under similar circumstances maybe 10-15 years ago, also in the southwest). Certainly something the investigators will look at.Maybe not knowingly. Have you ever checked your scoreboard and found that the AP wasn’t actually engaged? Or the mode you thought you’d selected wasn’t showing engaged? I know I have.
Maybe? You think he was manually flying the aircraft into the flight levels?
Moderate turbulence was reported. Could he have found some stronger turbulence that damaged the aircraft?
Hence why cautious about hard-core speculating. And why armchair wannabe-investigator idiots like Dan Gryder and his less angry little brother Juan Browne, so annoy the crap out of me with their idiotic clickbait accident videos they make right after an accident, trying to wrap things up like a 1 hour prime time crime episode.
I agree. It reads like either a loss of instrumentation or spatial D in moderate turbulence at night IMC.It's not easy to break a Pilatus. and in the extremely rare case that you do, it's going straight down.
This plane was likely intact 'till impact.
That last one was nothing but a death wish. The NTSB report was sickening.
You think their GOM would prohibit hand flying? I've never had that restriction.Manually flying into the flight levels isn't that difficult. Would probably go against the GOM tho
Curious what avionics suite it had.
It's not easy to break a Pilatus. and in the extremely rare case that you do, it's going straight down.
This plane was likely intact 'till impact.
I would imagine it had the standard King EFIS 40, probably upgraded with a GTN-something.Manually flying into the flight levels isn't that difficult. Would probably go against the GOM tho
Curious what avionics suite it had.
It's not easy to break a Pilatus. and in the extremely rare case that you do, it's going straight down.
This plane was likely intact 'till impact.
You think their GOM would prohibit hand flying? I've never had that restriction.
I would imagine it had the standard King EFIS 40, probably upgraded with a GTN-something.
I agree. It reads like either a loss of instrumentation or spatial D in moderate turbulence at night IMC.
Did you ever fly 135?I worded that wrong.
If the pilot was hand flying it due to loss of A/P while flying single pilot, that would likely be against the GOM
Did you ever fly 135?
TF you think a PC12 is made out of
“The PC12 cannot be destroyed my normal turbulence Fholbert son of Gloin.”
“How do we know if the airplane broke up in flight? We found parts of the airplane one-half to three-quarters of a mile away” from the crash scene, NTSB Vice Chair Bruce Landsberg said at a news briefing in Carson City.It's not easy to break a Pilatus. and in the extremely rare case that you do, it's going straight down.
This plane was likely intact 'till impact.
TF you think a PC12 is made out of
I’ve had that model (assuming it has standard avionics) A/P kick off in turbulence a few times.Maybe? You think he was manually flying the aircraft into the flight levels?
Moderate turbulence was reported. Could he have found some stronger turbulence that damaged the aircraft?
“How do we know if the airplane broke up in flight? We found parts of the airplane one-half to three-quarters of a mile away” from the crash scene, NTSB Vice Chair Bruce Landsberg said at a news briefing in Carson City.
![]()
NTSB says medical plane apparently broke apart before crash
The National Transportation Safety Board has sent in a seven-member team of investigators to the site of Friday night’s crash near Stagecoach.www.newsnationnow.com
Based on your recent guessing and my recent guessing, I'd be wise to stay the course.Well, that'll do it.
Now, directly due to the turbulence or did it cause an unusual attitude that led to the breakup.
(I'm guessing the latter)