HRDiva
Well-Known Member
Some of my favorite people joined it.I like the program. I just don't like the people who tend to join it.
Some of my favorite people joined it.I like the program. I just don't like the people who tend to join it.
I'm really sorry about that, man.My best friend in college killed himself.
From the stories I heard as a gate agent from some of those guys, the training seems like a pretty awesome time.I like the program. I just don't like the people who tend to join it.
I like the program. I just don't like the people who tend to join it.
I think it serves a deterrent role, perhaps. But really we don't know if the reward is greater than the risk. It's inexpensive in terms of federal dollars spent per mission flown, so that's good.
And then "along came KCM". And I'm sure we all know what I'm getting at.
"Hey, aren't you a… wait, where is your… aww nevermind"
I wholeheartedly agree.IMO, and I'm sure I'll get flak for it, the FFDO program is completely unnecessary and a waste of resources.
I wholeheartedly agree.
There are very few situations to which the addition of a firearm on board is a great idea. (etc., etc., etc., redacted etc.)
Begging your pardon, sir, but I am all about reducing or eliminating unnecessary risk, to the extent practical, hence my feelings on the topic.There are times when it could be useful. There are probably more times when it could be an unnecessary risk. Meh. It is what it is.
Begging your pardon, sir, but I am all about reducing or eliminating unnecessary risk, to the extent practical, hence my feelings on the topic.
(there's an episode of M*A*S*H in which Hawkeye is handed a firearm...)
LOL!Aaaaaand there goes my "reserves available" in the moderator corps.
I'm going to have to inverse assign and do jetway assignments to cover this one.![]()
I was coming through LAX a few years ago, and there was guy with a sign that said 'Free hugs'.
I took him up on the offer, and it was nice.
The species needs more of that.
-Fox
IMO, and I'm sure I'll get flak for it, the FFDO program is completely unnecessary and a waste of resources.
loliforniaI wholeheartedly agree.
There are very few situations to which the addition of a firearm on board is a great idea. (etc., etc., etc., redacted etc.)
Well, yes, there's that. I'm also a (legal) handgun owner too.lolifornia
No dog in the fight but couldn't resist
In the 135 world we have 135.119b. Followed by our GOM that states ~ all crew members are authorized to carry firearms at the PICs discretion.Well, yes, there's that. I'm also a (legal) handgun owner too.
I oppose the program as a questionable use of federal monies. The same problem I have with many other federal programs.
Flying isn't routine. No two flights are ever the same. Flying seems routine thanks to the dedication of thousands of professionals that strive to make it as routine as it is for our passengers and cargo entrusted for us to fly. Flying is extremely safe for what it is. There is a big difference between routine and safe. Your fellow 'contributor' misses this point. The reason why it may seem routine to him is that after a complex tragedy like the German Wings flight, the aviation community, led by Pilots, come together and challenge each other to make the system safer and enact changes in an attempt to guarantee that the system that the pilot is in with the airplane are operating in is the safest possible. The pilot is devoted to the passenger's and cargo's safety for more reasons than that they are 'simply in the airplane with you'. Pilot's want this industry to succeed. Many have livelihoods that depend on it and they want nothing more than a safe and vibrant system for themselves and their counterparts at other airlines.
What I am asking the Flying Magazine writer on here to do is bring back these thoughts to the other 'contributor' and other's thoughts on here towards what he wrote. He missed the mark completely in his attempt at an op-ed. I would personally characterize it as a sensationalism journalism.
I am sure others would also love for the poster on here to bring back their thoughts about what Les Asbend is saying as well...
There are times when it could be useful. There are probably more times when it could be an unnecessary risk. Meh. It is what it is.