PhilosopherPilot
Well-Known Member
Management has immense authority to fire bad apples. They're just too incompetent to use it.
Maybe so. I can think of a few from my last airline...
Management has immense authority to fire bad apples. They're just too incompetent to use it.
Thanks darling, you may go back to cheerleading now.Shameful how different you are treated? How's that?
I was treated with Southern Hospitality when I jumped seated on Southernjets as a CRJ pilot and now am treated with the same Southern hospitality as a fellow crewmember.
Along with the "they don't wave back at me in the terminal" I think these are false perceptions ingrained in one's head after reading countless Internet musing about a particular pilot group.
a regional new hire is for the most part a new 121 pilot and this untested in airline flying. I don't think it's safe to say if they pass one 121 check ride they should have a clear path to a mainline career.
Thanks darling, you may go back to cheerleading now.
He's right about the southern hospitality part, problem was I was the northerner Catholic in the southern bible belt. Now, his viewpoint is unquestionably unbiased and we've all dealt with the pilots who fool themselves easily because facts don't fit their world view. I have a harder time with doublethink.Yeah. That didn't take long.
He's right about the southern hospitality part, problem was I was the northerner Catholic in the southern bible belt. Now, his viewpoint is unquestionably unbiased and we've all dealt with the pilots who fool themselves easily because facts don't fit their world view. I have a harder time with doublethink.
I like his logic, "how is it you were treated different when I didn't experience it?" "If I didn't experience it it didn't happen." Of course having bleepy comments about the flow, the SSP, and regionals was, of course, all in my head. It's in everyone's head at Endeavor who shared similar stories commuting in and out. Really though, it was a vast right-wing conspiracy against @Trip7 's husband and the entire party.
Rogah. I rescind my post forthwith.I should have quoted better. I was just referring to the Moak thing.
a regional new hire is for the most part a new 121 pilot and this untested in airline flying. I don't think it's safe to say if they pass one 121 check ride they should have a clear path to a mainline career.
Maybe so. I can think of a few from my last airline...
Every airline has them, including the legacies. But like I said, the problem is incompetence in management. I've represented guys who straight up deserved to be fired. They were completely incompetent and downright dangerous in certain situations. But management was just too damned stupid to do anything about it. Create a little paper trail, and you're covered. That's all it takes.
So your hoping that a reinterviewing will fend them off?Some are competent pilots, but such complete and utter asses that they create a dangerous CRM environment. It's hard to fire them because they haven't done anything "wrong" other than being jerks.
For a mainline job? Absolutely. The regional job is the interview. Flow everyone up.
I've represented guys who straight up deserved to be fired. They were completely incompetent and downright dangerous in certain situations
They do have an obligation to make sure the process is fair. It's kind of like the US, have have the rule of law, and sometimes guys get off on "technicalities". We try to keep some fashion, some sense of the rule of law so that all pilots are held to the same standard.Another union problem. You should not protect those who deserve to be fired and/or are downright dangerous. The flying public deserves better than to preserve some random seniority number.
Why don't you look at it from a different angle. There are several ways to terminate a pilot's employment if the company feels that's the best course. The union does not protect the pilot, rather they protect the contract that was mutually agreed upon by both the company and the collective bargaining agent. If the company wants to terminate a pilot there is a format in how to do that. In most, if not all, ALPA contracts that is found in Section 19. I understand your frustration seeing the same few individuals keep their employment when clearly they aren't a right fit. Unfortunately certain management groups don't do the necessary leg work to properly terminate those pilots employment.Another union problem. You should not protect those who deserve to be fired and/or are downright dangerous. The flying public deserves better than to preserve some random seniority number.
You're giving Delta's business decisions to divest in expensive 50 RJ flying credit to Moak?ATL Concourse C Pre Lee Moak:
View attachment 29352
ATL Concourse C Post Lee Moak:
View attachment 29353
Another union problem. You should not protect those who deserve to be fired and/or are downright dangerous. The flying public deserves better than to preserve some random seniority number.
Shouldn't you post something up with girls then? Not women. Lot of women that are lawyers and scientists and they argue with facts and use logic. Little girls and little boys often don't I agree.You guys argue like girls.